An open letter, to CIA, US Navy, and DOD, which need funds, for climate change intel:

Fact: you can not, or will not provide a source for your claim that the Berkeley Earth Temperature Study didn't pass peer review!!

Funny how when you actually had a source for me claiming I was a man made climate change skeptic, you provided it huh?

Watch out buddy, it was a trap.

 

No I can provide a link for it in a few seconds I can destroy the credibility of BEST at will. I'm far mire interested in your fraudulent claim of having been a skeptic. I want to see if you really were a skeptic like you said or if you just made a false claim for rhetorical purposes as Muller did.

As I said I'm sick and tired of the fraudulent skeptics and moderates. Tell the truth for once. If you were ever a skeptic you would know that BEST was rejected by JGR. Or you would at least do your due diligence to find out why BEST says it was submitted to JGR but was instead published in volume 1 issue 1 if an unknown journal.

You would also be curious as to why Dr. Judith Curry is no longer listed as a lead author. You are skeptical of nothing.

 

Prove it!

 

No! I want you to prove that you were a skeptic.You made your claim first.

Dont worry I have the post where I showed the rejection by JGR book marked I can get it when ever I want. I'm far more interested in your false claim that you were ever a skeptic.

 

Do you really believe this is working?

I was addressing another poster explaining to him that I was a skeptic of MMCC.

You are asking me to prove this.

How would you like me to go about doing this?

Shall I walk around all day and count the times I am skeptical, record the information, and present in a excel spread sheet for you?

Source your claim, or S T F U!!

 

Its simple. You act like a skeptic. You do your due diligence on the paper you claimed made you see the light. If you wont do that then you were never a skeptic.

 

LMAO!!!!! LOL!!! This is fun!!!!

So when I asked for a source to verrify your claim myself, how doesn't this meet your criteria that you just laid out?

Do you think I was asking for a source because, when you provided it, this was somehow going to undermine your agument?

It has been my experience that making statements and backing them up with sources gives you credibility, hence how I use sources all the time without being prompted.

Hell I even started a thread before on this very topic of how wierd I think it is that people make claims that are not well know, and think they don't need to provide a source for this!

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...23-weird-very-few-source-there-claims-pf.html

 

You shouldn't have to verify my claim. If you were a skeptic you should know it already.

That us why I don't believe you. I think you are doing the same thing Muller did and misrepresenting yourself as a former skeptic for rhetorical purposes.

 

You have been so outed for not being able to provide a source for your claim it isn't even funny!

Gotten to!

 

It is funny because i had this discussion with Mannie and even he recognizes that BEST failed its review at JGR. It ain't exactly a secret.

Im just leading you on to see just how obstinate you are. With every post you prove that you were never a skeptic and just said you were for rhetorical purposes.

 

Windigo has no source and is the definition of a liar!!!!

This is the only response you will get from me in this thread for now on!

 

Actually a liar would be someone who says something they know to be false.

I know for a fact that JGR rejected BEST. .. twice... and I'm willing to bet that by now you have realized that fact as well.

So when you call someone a liar when you know for a fact that what they said is true that is by definition a lie!

 

Windigo has no source and is the definition of a liar!!!!

 

Keep saying it. This is getting very funny because by now you realize that it didn't pass review at JGR. So you are calling me a liar for saying something you know is true.

 

Windigo has no source and is the definition of a liar!!!!

prove it!

 

Prove you were ever a skeptic as you claimed and do your due diligence on the paper you say converted you.

 

Ill take pimptights mutness to be a concession that he knows that calling me a liar is a lie.
http://www.politicalforum.com/current-events/277845-climatologists-stupid-17.html#post1062010720

Here is the link to the post a few months ago where I schooled stagnent on Mullers rejection from JGR.