Another day, another judge unilaterally throws out a state's ban on same sex marriage

You people? What's that supposed to mean, you people?

^^I couldn't pass up using that line.

Simple logic and the Utah decision refute your argument. Marriage and procreation as two separate issues, and marriage encompasses far more than procreation. Not to mention procreation being completely unneeded for one to wed.

 

Comprehension of the written word isnt your strong suit.

"We are dealing here with legislation which involves one of the basic civil rights of man. Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race."

 

What is the "Gay Cabal" ? and why does anyone need to cite a law that pertains only to gays? What's your point? What are you trying to say?

 

yep. 2 separate rights not contingent upon one another. not sure why you continue to post things with support my argument, lol

 

It seems the meaning of "ONE" escapes you. It doesn't mean "2"

 

nope. you can marry without procreating and you can procreate without marrying. 2 separate rights not contingent upon one another. lol

 

No one has claimed otherwise. Soooooooo not sure what the "nope" refers to.

Fathers and mothers providing and caring for their children is the foundation of the family.

Because it was against the law for a man to cohabitate with a woman not his wife. Against the law for a man to have sexual relations with a woman not his wife. Marriage is a right because you couldn't legally procreate and raise your offspring with your mate, without a marriage.

No law ever required gays to marry in order to engage in sexual relations and gay sexual relations don't create families.

 

your incorrect statement, obviously.

of one type of family. marriage and procreation remain 2 separate rights.

and now it isn't

and now it isn't

and now you can. 2 separate rights not contingent upon each other.

no relevance of any kind.

 

The statement was accurate.

 

nope. 2 separate rights not contingent upon one another.

 

The supreme court says otherwise.

 

actually they don't.

 

Lets see it. I provided the quote from the supreme court. Do you EVER have anything than the thoughts bouncing around in your head to support your claims?

 

your avatar is well chosen

 

Hey Dix...have you asked yourself how long it's going to take for SCOTUS to prohibit gay marriage bans?

Also, have you noticed what good campany you're in lately?....only 3rd world dirt holes and Islamic republics are banning gay marriage.

You too Grok, you are one funny arab hat...and one day at a mosque....and a beard away from being an American equivelent to Talibanesque intolerance

 

the quote from the supreme court doesn't support your statement. the right to procreate is not contingent upon marriage. the right to marry is not contingent upon procreation. 2 separate rights which are not dependent upon one another.

 

It's going to be a fun day, when dixon....no longer cites the US Supreme Court as authority.

 

Speaking of comprehension, "Marriage AND procreation" and not "marriage FOR procreation".

 

I'll continue to cite the previous decisions and point out how the current court hasnt even addressed its current precedent.

- - - Updated - - -

No one claimed otherwise. Ill wait here while you spend a couple days chasing that irrelevant tangent.

 

No one claimed it was contingent. Let go of the strawman if you can.

- - - Updated - - -

You wont find any state with a ban on "gay marriage". Thats just this fiction these courts have created.

 

you claimed it of course.............

lol

 

I of course was referring to the "2 separate rights" portion of your statement. Your lack of one being contingent upon the other is your strawman

 

Just proved you were full of (*)(*)(*)(*) by directly quoting you.

And it is of course 2 separate rights. everyone has the right to procreate. everyone has the right to marry. don't need to do one in order to do the other.

I would just let it go before you look any dumber.

 

You are a joke. You didn't prove anything other than your inability to read the written word.

 

..........