Anti-mask doctor's medical license suspended

The "asymptomatic carrier" fear mongering is just a term used to scare people. Those people simply aren't sick.

 

Oh geez, what far-right blog told you that lie?

https://www.healthline.com/health-n...9-are-asymptomatic-but-can-spread-the-disease
https://www.uchealth.org/today/the-truth-about-asymptomatic-spread-of-covid-19/
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/938195
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-03141-3

 

Spoonfed a mountain of evidence...refuses even to look at it, craps on the evidence he never even looked at...

...as predicted. Thats why i dont perform these trollish exercises. They are really just dishonest begging for attention.

 

That is easily the dumbest thing i have read about all this. And i have read some painfully stupid stuff from the denier crowd.

 

You have demonstrated zero working knowledge of even one citation in your cut and paste heroics. Bravo.

You'd be laughed out of any room of scientists with that epic performance

 

I don't think the principles need demonstration. I am not trying to convince anyone. I am pushing back against utter nonsense. If you don't understand the mask idea, then that is your problem. I am not here to teach or to spend pages spoonfeeding publicly available information on mask wearing to strangers on the internet. If you don't like that, that's fine. I can live with that.

 

You're pushing back while demonstrating zero understanding of what youre pushing with. Outstanding!

 

You can soothe yourself out loud all day about me, but the truth of all this doesn't depend on what I had for breakfast. In fact, that's why you are here, slapfighting with nonscientist strangers, instead of presenting your nonsense in an actual professional or scientific venue full of experts. We both know what would happen .. you would be laughed out of the room. So here you are.

 

Slowly and surely
"The State" makes it ever more difficult
to be a conscientious physician.

For example:
Treating a patient for pain is threatening and
requires more and more state supervision.


Moi, M.D. ret.

Don't Further
ize
​

 

Still haven't figured out what the null hypothesis is and why I don't have to "prove" it, have you?

Sad.
You guys say the word "science" but have no clue what you're talking about

 

You trust today's "experts" with the blind faith typical of a member of The Church of The Poisoned Mind.

I strongly MIStrust such "experts". During the last 12 months the experts have been so wildly off the mark that one can conclude only PLANDEMIC.

 

None. I come up with arguments all by myself, you see... I don't steal the arguments of others.

All "holy-links" are dismissed on sight. They are not valid sources. Learn to form your own arguments.

 

Argument of the stone fallacy. No counterargumentation presented.

 

Me?? I wash my hands when I go to the bathroom and before I eat. I do not obsessively wash my hands. I do not use hand sanitizer unless there is no soap and water available.

 

Nope. The whole "asymptomatic carrier" fear mongering with regard to this virus is simply people who are not sick. Finding a couple of viruses way deep inside of one's nasal cavities does not constitute an infection nor a "case". It is just fear mongering and media psyops attempting to control your mind. Looks like it is working.

 

not you, the doctor this topic is about

there was a time doctors though washing your hands was fake news too

they wondered why more babies dying when delivered by doctors than midwives

sadly there were doctors that swore up and down it made no difference

 

I don't know thing one about astrophysics and so I don't "come up with arguments all by myself" about the neutronic wavelength variations resulting from the rotational velocity influences of colliding celestial remnants. Do you know why I don't do that? Because I'd look like a damn fool if I tried.

Same reason why I'm not at all inclined to go with you on this "the whole asymptomatic carrier fear mongering" thing because a) the people who are claiming that are from extremest tin-foil hat nutter blogs with nothing but wild conspiracy theories aka damn fools, and b) the people who can prove otherwise hold medical degrees, can stand on mountains of scientific research, and join the near entirety of their peers in agreement.

And not for nothing but dismissing things that don't tell you what you want to hear, such as links from 100% valid peer reviewed publications, is a great but dangerous way to aid in the formation of a self reinforcing delusion.

 

So you trust a mentally ill president and your own colon over the experts. Uh...good for you. I am not so sure that is something to be proud of.

 

your editorializing and lack of science is noted.

 

There's a lot of topics that this applies for you, so it seems.

If you don't know what you're talking about, as you've self admitted, how would you know that I don't know what I'm talking about? All you can do is appeal to experts and popularity, which are both logical fallacies.

This is one form of an appeal to popularity fallacy. Specifically, you are doing both an 'elitist highbrow' and a 'dismissal as conspiracy theory'... You are also committing a bulverism fallacy. You are not very knowledgeable about logic either, obviously...

Here, you continue the 'elitist highbrow' as well as remain completely ignorant about what science is and how it works. A medical degree is not science. Peer review is not science. Neither make a theory of science any more or less of a theory of science.

Here, you are committing a false authority fallacy (holy links are not a valid source of science; they are false authorities, as science itself (the theories of science themselves) are the only authoritative source with regard to this. Peer review is not science. Publications are not science. It is people like YOU who try to eliminate the voices of doctors (with all the same credentials and peer review) who happen to say things that you don't wish to hear.

 

Damn, you put a lot of effort into defending that conspiracy theory, mostly by just making it all about me but still, damn. That is all I have to say.

 

*says the guy who doesn't trust the scientists

How bizarre...

 

You gonna show me a scientist's paper that demonstrates decreased incidence of disease, or you just gonna flap your gums?

 

If you were actually pushing back against utter nonsense, you would be pushing back against Fauci & Friends, but you're not. You are an apologist for the Grand Illusion. You support corrupted science and its official agenda and narrative.

 

Continued appeal to popularity fallacy (specifically, dismissing an argument as a "conspiracy theory"). You're now also committing an argument of the stone fallacy (dismissing an argument without any counterargument)

No valid argumentation presented.