Arizona Auditors Discover DELETED Files!!

I want to ask a simple question for the people here. What do you think those files are? How do you know? What does the byte size of those files mean to you? If a file is deleted does that mean someone deleted it?

 

Sniff sniff did you smell someone spreading bullshit because I think I caught a whiff or two myself

 

We don’t waste time explaining right wing brain farts.
The auditing company is run by a trump cultist and is just making things up as they go.

 

Or someone in this recount deleted them because there was no oversight and they needed something because the ballots were not lining up in their favor.
This accusation could not be made had they done things properly but they didn't so they have absolutely zero validity.

 

Given even the NAME of the half- arsed company running this the only surprise would be if they came back and said there was no “stolen ballots”.

 

I am a programmer and not a DB expert and we do not work with Microsoft Databases but the ops suggestion "Entire disc drives containing adjudication ballots have been deleted to cover the crooks tracks." is totally unsubstantiated with what we see in that screen shot. What I see is a bunch of SQL server DB files. The ldf files are log files and the mdf files are the SQL server DB files. They may not even contain and ballot information and only table, schema info. The fact you see files from 3 different years all around the same size makes me think it is the template for the schema of the database. We have no idea what was in this database but I would guess it does not contain the original adjudicated ballots. If the adjudicated ballots are digital only then at best this would be a copy. That is why I asked the simple question "what do you think these files are"? I think many people including the guy in the video, (watch at the 30 second mark), thinks those files are adjudicated ballot files. They are not.

Further more the whole suggestion that deleted files = wrong doing is crazy. That is why I asked "if a file is deleted, does that mean someone deleted it?". Many system operations can delete files. A simple move of a file from one participation to another will result in a deleted file. If you drop an empty SQL DB it will create deleted files. Deleted files do not have to mean someone is committing a crime.

 

Also, if they did a full delete they'd have no clue what was deleted and if they didn't even I could recover the files. Put this complaint under made up bull hockey.

 

I live in the tropics and fortunately the windows are always open when I'm in a room.

 

The guy in the video said you CANNOT truly delete something. If he believes that he should let me have access to his computer. He should google a simple term called "file shredding".

 

Thanks mate - a bit TMI for me

you just KNOW anything this lot would find would have to be pure Panda pucky

 

Had you done that he'd be unable to identify that anything had been deleted. OK, a completely empty space on the drive would be suspect but then again there would be no way to claim what it had been, maybe the operator just deleted their at work porn collection.

 

As a SQL Server DBA, they all look like previously saved backups from previous elections. I doubt Joe or Hunter had anything to do with them.

 

If you did that who would be left to finish the re-re-re-count?

 

Really? How did they delete files before they had access to the hardware?

That would be pretty impressive.

 

Read my last post

 

Pretty crazy timing if the system “automatically” deleted those files the day before they were given to the audit team huh?

It’s also pretty crazy that ALL information regarding elections have to be retained for 3 or 5 years legally and yet they have a computer automatically deleting said info.

 

Or the more plausible explanation... They have something to hide, so they tried to hide it.

 

Right. The cyber ninjas I was able to find some thing that bipartisan audits and recounts didn’t catch the last time?

Bring evidence to the Senate and not tweets. Continue to be laughed at until you do so.

 

Bipartisan audits and recounts only attempt to check the count. Not the validity of the ballots. But good try.

 

Did the Ninja offer any proof or just make the claim knowing that all of you folks would never question them?

 

They posted the screen shot. But no “proof” yet. And again, it’s possible these are just duplicate files. But I would assume if that were the case the Audits senate liaison wouldn’t have put it on his Twitter claiming spoliation.

 

That settles it...if it is on Twitter it has to be true. Nobody is allowed to lie in twitter

 

That’s true. But they didn’t just make the claim, they did at least produce what they’re claiming is evidence. We will see what it is evidence of forthwith I reckon.

 

Why would you assume that? The people who called for the audit have already made it clear that they believe there was fraud. The people who support them have already decided that this is 'proof', no matter what is later revealed.....just like they did with all the debunked claims since the election.

This is a 100% political process, which is why an unqualified organization from Florida run by a pro-Trump conspiracy theorist was used. There is no reason to assume anyone involved will put honesty ahead of politics.

 

That’s fair. I’m happy to wait until they produce their evidence and then make a judgment based upon said evidence.