Biden: No amendment is absolute

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by TOG 6, Apr 11, 2021.

  1. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...y-president-biden-on-gun-violence-prevention/
    Wait...

    The 5th amendment is not absolute?
    -The state CAN force you to bear witness against yourself?
    -The state CAN try you twice for the same crime?

    The 8th Amendment is not absolute?
    - The state CAN inflict cruel or unusual punishment?

    The 13th Amendment is not absolute?
    - Slavery and/or involuntary servitude CAN exist within the US?

    The 14th Amendment is not absolute?
    - People born here CAN be denied citizenship?

    The 15th Amendment is not absolute?
    - People CAN be denied the right to vote based on color?

    The 19th Amendment is not absolute?
    - People CAN be denied the right to vote based on sex?

    Well, this is good to know.
    Thanks, Joe!
     
    Grau, RodB, ButterBalls and 6 others like this.
  2. TedintheShed

    TedintheShed Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,301
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Conservatives have been trying to change the 14th Amendment for decades, it's the whole basis for the anchor baby thingy, remember?
     
    Arkanis likes this.
  4. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No, no amendment is absolute as the constitution can be amended through legal precedent / SCOTUS interpretation as well as can be edited (or removed) with a new amendment.

    The entire constitution can be dissolved if we so choose.
     
    Arkanis likes this.
  5. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,139
    Likes Received:
    4,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure thing. So instead of mucking around with the 2nd Amendment because a specific portion of the country doesn't particularly like it how about we go about amending it via the legally outlined process instead?

    I am 100% in favor of the United States going through the legal constitutionally outlined process to amend the 2nd Amendment.
     
    Ddyad and XXJefferson#51 like this.
  6. XXJefferson#51

    XXJefferson#51 Banned

    Joined:
    May 29, 2017
    Messages:
    16,405
    Likes Received:
    14,885
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That he says the bill of rights is not absolute should be shocking to all Americans.
     
    Ddyad and dharbert like this.
  7. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    53,179
    Likes Received:
    49,531
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That pesky old Constitution always getting in the way of the liberal agenda we ought to do away with that antiquated old document
     
  8. Rampart

    Rampart Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2017
    Messages:
    7,880
    Likes Received:
    7,054
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    the first amendment : you can not yell "fire" in the theatre
    you can not protest too close to the convention
    native americans and rastafarians can not practice their religious sacraments

    the fourth amendment: asset forfeiture

    the 5th amendment: you must testify under immunity

    the 8th amendment: people routinely are killed, beaten, and raped in prison.

    etc etc etc
     
  9. fmw

    fmw Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2009
    Messages:
    38,433
    Likes Received:
    14,799
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Common sense says that people born here are, by definition, citizens. There shouldn't even be an argument.
     
  10. joesnagg

    joesnagg Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2020
    Messages:
    4,749
    Likes Received:
    6,799
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Doesn't the Constitution exist to ensure the GOVERNMENTS power is not "absolute".....
     
  11. modernpaladin

    modernpaladin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    27,983
    Likes Received:
    21,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    True. Though to be legitimate (lawful), it has to be done via constitutional convention. It was always intended to be a difficult process requiring overwhelming public support. The reason our political system never tries to go this route is because that overwhelming support isn't there. Most of what we do that is constitutionally forbidden only has a tiny simple majority (just over 50%), if even that. The constitution was meant to be a check against that sort of mob rule.
     
    XXJefferson#51, Ddyad and joesnagg like this.
  12. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for your concession of the point.
     
    XXJefferson#51 likes this.
  13. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, you agree:

    -The state CAN force you to bear witness against yourself
    -The state CAN try you twice for the same crime
    - The state CAN inflict cruel or unusual punishment
    - Slavery and/or involuntary servitude CAN exist within the US
    - People born here CAN be denied citizenship
    - People CAN be denied the right to vote based on color
    - People CAN be denied the right to vote based on sex

    Good to know.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  14. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    According to Joe, there -can- be exceptions to birth right citizenship guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  15. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I agree, but to be fair we — as a nation — would probably have an issue agreeing that dihydrogen monoxide shouldn’t be banned if left up to a majority. There is very little each side agrees on and when both sides do agree government officials try and block it (think marijuana legalization).

    Several of the founders also believed the constitution should be rewritten occasionally to keep the document modern. Reading some of the federalist papers the constitution doesn’t even remotely resemble what it was intended to be. States were largely supposed to be independent with the federal government being involved only in the largest of issues. This would be unworkable in today’s society.
     
    modernpaladin likes this.
  16. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, you agree:

    -The state CAN force you to bear witness against yourself
    -The state CAN try you twice for the same crime
    - The state CAN inflict cruel or unusual punishment
    - Slavery and/or involuntary servitude CAN exist within the US
    - People born here CAN be denied citizenship
    - People CAN be denied the right to vote based on color
    - People CAN be denied the right to vote based on sex

    Good to know.
     
    Ddyad likes this.
  17. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Should a pregnant woman who is a non-citizen be allowed to fly into the country, have a child within a few hours / days of arrival and that child be a US citizen? In your opinion...
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2021
  18. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of this matters.
    According to Joe, there -can- be exceptions to birth right citizenship guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
     
    ButterBalls and Ddyad like this.
  19. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Or, the 14th could be strengthened by CHANGING the language to cover even more situations. Ergo - changed, but still having
    the core rights. Therefor, all Amendments could be altered without denying the guarantee rights contained in the original version.
    That would be a point for Joe and a fail for you. Just say'n.

    The 2nd could be ALTERED by spelling out gun rights in a more modern fashion WITHOUT taking present rights away
    from citizens, merely modernizing the language. That would be another point for Joe's argument, and another fail for you.
     
  20. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, no, no no no...
    Joe didn't say anything about --changing-- any amendment, he said no amendment -- NO amendment - as written, is absolute.
    If you agree, it means you believe, among other things, there -can- be exceptions to birthright citizenship guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2021
    ButterBalls likes this.
  21. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Every one of these items can be removed by various constitutional processes. Do you need me to post the definition of absolute or do you need me to explain the amendment process?
     
  22. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He didn’t say exceptions.
    He said no amendment is absolute.
    Those are two different words with two different meanings.

    Why can’t you answer the question?
    Let me guess!?! You agree with *gasp* Biden?
     
  23. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh, no, no no no...
    Joe didn't say anything about --changing-- any amendment, he said no amendment -- NO amendment - as written, is absolute.
    If you agree, it means you believe, among other things, there -can- be exceptions to birthright citizenship guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  24. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct.
    It means the statement in the 14th amendment that all people born here are citizens is not absolute.
    This means there -can- be exceptions to birthright citizenship.
    If you agree with Joe, it means you agree with me.
     
    Last edited: Apr 12, 2021
    ButterBalls likes this.
  25. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Correct, no amendment as written or conceptualized is unlimited, permanent or unquestionable. The entire constitution can be revoked. Something that is permanent cannot be revoked.

    Do the people of this nation have the ability to revoke the constitution, yes or no?
     

Share This Page