Biden: No amendment is absolute

Non seq.
"Previous condition of servitude" refers to previously being a slave, not a convicted criminal..

 

When Biden tries to make slavery legal in the country again let me know, and then I will be alarmed.

Till then I am going to keep laughing at you pearl clutchers freaking out over a poorly worded statement.

 

Prove it.

 

Your claim, onus is on you to prove it true.
The website you supplied does not prove anything, for the reasons I supplied.

 

As I said, I gave two sources. I do not give a flying **** if you like them or not.

 

"Poorly worded"?
How about "intentionally misleading"?

 

I accept your concession.

 

I think it was intended that we would toss out the officials who undermine/circumvent the process for amending the constitution. We eventually will have to by some means do just that to get back to the system as it was intended. The alternative is inevitable authoritarianism.

 

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

The guy has a 40 plus year history of saying dumb ****, but this time it was him being a evil mastermind!

 

Good to see you disagree with his statement.

 

I agree with the general sentiment he was attempting to convey as most amendments have some limitations to them.

If it makes you happy to focus on the exact wording I am very happy for you.

 

But you -disagree- with what he -actually- said.
Good to see you disagree with his statement.

 

I have friends that have stopped, and a few of them are in hiding! They call it "The Illegal Mexican amendment"..

 

Yep, you win! Congrats! Well done, you won an argument on the internet! I am sure all your little buddies will be so proud of you when you tell them during D&D tonight. You should celebrate your victory!

 

So, I say give the mother a choice, leave with, or leave without!

 

Good of you to finally be honest about it.

 

I have been honest about it from the beginning. But that was not good enough for you, I had to declare you the winner because for some unknown reason that is very important to you. And in all honesty I am happy to help out! We all have different priorities in life

 

It is the supreme court that

In my view, if she lives with the child then the child is still a natural born citizen.

 

From the part you quoted...

Does he realize that the reason those certain people weren't allowed to have guns was due to the fact that they were enslaved?... great argument there Joe. Just make gun rights advocates point for them!

 

4th Amendment does not apply to asset forfeiture. That is actually covered by the 5th Amendment:

Additionally the "must testify under immunity" is only IF you agree to the immunity in the first place. Meaning that you voluntarily give up your 5th Amendment Right to not be compelled. (yes, people can voluntarily give up Rights...happens all the time...Don't believe me? Join the Military/government and try revealing State Secrets...your 1st amendment will not apply)

8th Amendment: False equivalency. The fact that illegal things can happen that violate a persons Rights does not mean that they do not have those Rights.

etc etc etc.

 

And once it is of legal age, he or she is welcome to come back... Or if there are naturalized relatives willing to adopt or care for the child fine..

 

You disapprove of American citizens living abroad?

 

Right. Slaves and people in jail.
Other than that there were no restrictions on the weapons you could own or on who could own/use them.

 

You want to take a new born from it's ILLEGAL immigrant mother

 

No. The mother wasn't born in the U.S.