Bigotry nonsense

Any sexual contact between humans can be a vector for the spread of disease, STDs and many other infectious diseases, and condoms are only a stop gap measure.

Any couple, humans, share much more than love, in a physical sex act, you don't need to be a Doctor to understand that.

That is why medical council for ALL couples is a good idea, and monogamous relationships are a good idea, when a person has many partners and casual sex, this is classified as high risk behavior, especially concerning STDs, something young people do not consider when engaging multiple partners, many of these contracting AIDS and these are mostly heterosexual teenagers that experiment with same sex encounters of various types.

 

Lots of words. No substantial meaning.

 

Was Jesus being tolerant when he said, Let you who has not sinned, cast the 1st stone?
I could give you just as many verses of tolerance as you can about not being tolerant.
So you only take the negative of Jesus and try to get everyone else to live like you think they should.

 

Your tripe is a sin. Many don't want to hear your load of crap you wish to spew.
So now what?
When you stop sinning, then you can have some voice in what you claim are sins by others.
And if one isn't a christian, then it isn't a sin to them and you have no say in their lives.

 

Wow. You get confused easily. You being young has nothing to do with your responses. So I was defending you for being young, not being a bigot to them.
I said you are wrong because you don't know much about life, age has nothing to do with it.
A 90 yr old could be wrong about life because they never left their tiny town, ever. And only know the world as their tiny town.

So your bigotry has nothing to do with age, it's just how you have been raised.

- - - Updated - - -

It is horrible how gays have been and to some extent still are treated.
And folks who believe like the Macabee's of the world, justify it.

 

A man rapes an unmarried woman, impregnating her. Should rape be celebrated because it results in another "American taxpayer"?

Two opposite-sex octogenarians marry, but fail to produce any children (to no one's surprise).

A man and woman marry, but find they're unable to reproduce. They adopt 6 orphaned children instead.

A dude marries a dude. They hire a surrogate to bear them a child via artificial insemination, thereby producing an eventual American taxpayer.

A man and woman marry. Together, they produce 19 children. (More than enough to replace themselves as taxpayers, and several non-producing couples.)

Your argument is about the stupidest thing I've read today, and that's saying something. Marriage is not required for reproduction, and reproduction is not a requirement of marriage. Just because two men marry each other, that doesn't mean they won't together decide on a course of action that results in "an American taxpayer".

If this is the best you can come up with, then don't bother.

 

Which presumes that politicians are honest and would never try to manipulate public opinion through the introduction of unneeded legislation, for their own political benefit.

:snort:

Seriously, is anyone really this naive? Lying liars lie, and politicians are some of the biggest lying liars on the planet.

 

I don't have anything clever to say to you. You seem to have cornered the market on intelligence (not) and don't need the input from anyone else.

- - - Updated - - -

I would have a battle of wits with you, but I don't take advantage of unarmed opponents.

 

I have no intentions whatsoever to do that. I love all people, its their sin (and mine too of course) that I hate. I hate murder but I love the murderer. Now if someone was going to murder me I'll give him a taste of God's judgment right here on earth.

Nor can the gay person demand that I make him a gay burger, whatever that'll look like.

Sorry that happened, no matter how wrong I think you are nobody has the right to bully you. Although this does bring up the point that most often gays were abused as a child before they had any feelings.

Just trying to get the right picture in my head, how old we're you when they started bullying you? Because if you are saying that 10 year olds raped you then I never knew that can happen.

Agree, except with the last part. My parents when they rented out our home in Denver made a rule that the renters can't be co-habiters along with other sexual immoralities. It's your house after all. If you don't like it then find another house.

Again I agree with the first, disagree with the latter. There is no such thing as a gay marriage. A marriage is between one man and one woman and the government has no say in the matter.

And I welcome all too, to repentance and accepting Jesus Christ as there Lord and savior.

 

Actually when it comes to stupid posts, I was thinking if yours were worthy of mention, it might get an Oscar. Your examples don't happen in the real world and detract from honest questions asked.

I've noticed that when the left doesn't have an argument, they resort to attacks. I find it intriguing that most of you that want to belittle me don't have what it takes to engage in civil discourse. Instead of the thread being about a serious topic, it becomes a penis measuring contest. Are you really that insecure??? Really???

A segment of society does not want to be part of the melting pot. They can be anybody. They might be racial separatists, Amish, or even Fundamentalists. The ONE WORLD crowd has an answer to every objection. Actually when I read some of your responses, we don't need a God. Some of you think you're greater than any God man can conjure up.

I think, in the final analysis, there will be no meeting of the minds. There will be a democratic vote until you lose. Then there will be force... and there will be a counter force. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Ultimately your side is going to lose. That is a fact that isn't even debatable. IF the people on your side were real, they would answer the questions asked with simple answers and not try to make every discussion a whizzing contest.

 

But AIDS started with the gays and its the one of the fastest ways of spreading STDs. Why is the average lifespan of gays is only 30 years?

But you don't need to have physical relations to express that love except when you are married to the opposite gender

The fidelity in the homosexual movement, particularly gays, is not all that high.

 

Your posts here seem to disagree with your assessment

Fear is not a requirement

You can add delusional to your list of adjectives - marriage is a legal and civil document in the United States, there are no restrictions based on gender.

Do you think the US should make law based on the justifications of the Quran?
Now exchange Quran with Bible.

If your argue yes to one and not the other you are a hypocrite advocating for theocracy, if you argue no to both then your arguments against "sin" are irrelevant.

 

Politicians are liars... of that there is no doubt. But, attorneys? Pronounced A Turn EE, the term means one who turns things around. Judges are also attorneys. In most states, as in Georgia, one cannot become an attorney unless they belong to the American Bar Association and / or receive their education / testing from an ABA approved institution.

The most left of center organization in America... the one that espouses everything a constitutionalist would find loathsome would be the ABA. Politicians v. the ABA. The pol that introduced the bill did so with an honest intent AND most of us with an IQ over 50 that got involved read the bill and considered the arguments of both sides.

 

That's precisely the kind of arrogant deflection that has resulted in so many "wins" for the anti marriage equality side in recent years.

Oh wait.......

 

I'm not, but some people think that pedophilia is just a liking.
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/


- - - Updated - - -

No becuase the government has no business in the matter.

 

You read them before quoting OP?

Marriage was defined for awhile as one man and one woman. Can polygamists call their union marriage?

 

Wonderful position, it fits nicely with the instructions laid out in the bible. Also the narcissistic believe you can dispense "God's judgment", I'm sure the sheer irony and blasphemy escapes your understanding.

Thats because there is no such thing, just like there is no such thing as a gay wedding cake, most reasonable thing you have said today.

Source for both claims please. Your signature seems to be inaccurate.

 

Well marriage licenses are issued by the government and they disagree.

 

I did

As of the time of this post no - even though it was practiced in just about every religion on record.

Second time: Do you think the US should make law based on the justifications of the Quran?
Now exchange Quran with Bible.

If you argue yes to one and not the other you are a hypocrite advocating for theocracy, if you argue no to both then your arguments against "sin" are irrelevant.

 

Arrogant deflection? Are you trying to be funny or did you spend a lot of time looking crap up in a dictionary and still don't know what it means?

I ask a serious question and am met with cowardly attacks by people that seem to wallow in bigotry. I'm not interested in participating in a referendum. They have a poll forum for that here. This was supposed to be a discussion regarding bigotry. I asked serious questions and got met with some posts belittling me and people posting stuff they would never say to a man's face.

If you want the conversation to proceed, you answer the questions without the attitude. If not, I'm not really interested. Again, if someone has a personal problem with me, they should take it to PM. We'll deal with it. If you want a conversation, quit pretending to be superior to those you disagree with.

I'm the kind of guy who prefers to challenge people face to face - not via a discussion board where you call in the mods when you start losing.

 

On average, lesbian relationships last longer that heterosexual relationships. Males are more promiscuous.

 

Show from the Bible where I'm wrong.

No but there's a gay message on the cake.

Ok.
http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/HIV.htm
The riskiest form of physical relations is where you do number two. And that's the most common way for gays to "express" themselves.

http://www.theroadtoemmaus.org/RdLb/22SxSo/PnSx/HSx/hosx_lifspn.htm

 

But the constitution defines it differently.

http://www.tnonline.com/2013/jul/27/marriage-between-one-man-and-one-woman

- - - Updated - - -

Fine, the male homosexuals are less likely to be faithful.

 

Then your point is moot.

News flash: the constitution and the Declaration of Independence are strongly based on Biblical views so again your point is moot.

 

A personal opinion from 2013 does not carry the same weight as the binding legal opinion of the USSC in 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Sorry about that, it's a done deal that would take a constitutional amendment to overturn. Not going to happen.