This is a debate site. If you want to make a point, you need to make it by using that thingie in front of you with all the letters on it. I'm not here to make your point for you. So you are almost there, except you have to prove something to have an actual disturbing the peace charge: https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/disturbing-the-peace.html These people's intent, they will argue, was to ensure equal protection under the law. That, they will say, was the purpose of their protest. So how can you prove it wasn't? You cannot merely say you were annoyed or harassed or embarrassed. It says so right there. You have to prove malicious intent. That is, harm is meant to come to them.
This is a debate site, and i made my point. It is not my job however to make you understand, that is your job. It is your job to do your own research, not my job to do it for you. The disturbing the peace charge fits perfectly, if you dont think so then i highly recommend you do some research on the topic. If it were as easy to explain it away as you say, there would never be anyone convicted of disturbing the peace lol. The reality is, its not.
officers are clearly murdering and maiming ppl with impunity so the ppl are then required to make their own laws. she was resisting according to them.
BLM are not law enforcement officers nor is there a requirement to comply with BLM. Again, it was an illogical comparison.
since cops are killing and maiming ppl with impunity then the ppl are forced to make their own laws. that is what revolutions are all about.
Revolutions work both ways, these protestors crumble in the face of equal numbers. You see it all around, constantly. Nonetheless, the comparison to police was illogical.
Incorrect, they work both ways as there is just as much civilian led opposition to terrorist groups like blm and antifa.
It is what it is.... On "topic", I wouldn't have raised my fist under those circumstances either. Nobody should demand another protest at a time and place not of their choosing.
but there isnt. it is one counter protester to 100 protesters. the only equalizer is the government lead militia i.e cops and army who are all paid off by the tyrannical regime.
I never have to understand your point. No more than you have to understand mine. And what i said is absolutely true. Distribing the peace is somoene showing up at your house in the middle of the night, throwing bottles at your windows and demanding you come out and fight them for some perceived slight. People protesting while you dine outside isn't. Their protest isn't trying to do you harm. So if you want to claim there's a legal charge here, that's fine, but I'm merely pointing out that if it were the case, then the police would have rounded them all up. There is video of your so called crime. And maybe they will. But I doubt even if they arrest, anyone is getting convicted over this. So it goes back to if you want to ensure you always dine in peace out of sight and sound of protesters in the United States, the best way to ensure it is to dine at home. That advice applies to liberals and conservatives alike as far as I'm concerned.
There absolutely is, there is just as much opposition to blm and antifa that is civilian led. They have been marched out of neighborhoods, quite easily.
This crap has to stop. Were it up to me, I'd arrest them, confiscate their gear, no bail, an automatic week in jail and a 250 dollar fine. Second offense would double the first, two weeks and 500.
Incorrect, it wasn’t true at all. This situation absolutely applies under disturbing the peace. You don’t have to agree, you are entitled to your opinion, but the object that remains the same...this applies. If you took time to research your opinion you would see it’s not nearly as easy as you present it to be to formulate an effective argument in court. If it were, no one would ever be convicted. The reality, regardless of anyone’s opinion otherwise, is this fits disturbing the peace. These people are absolutely entitled to eat without being harassed.
Incorrect, it’s happening on a purely civilian led level. There is just as much civilian opposition to terrorist organizations like blm and antifa. And blm and antifa crumble ez.
That's a damned lie. LEO's aren't killing and maiming people with impunity. The mobs have zero justification. And the truth and facts bear it out. It is not revolution, it is madness, driven by the Democrat party and the left wing media.
The more I watch this video, the more disturbing it is. First video, 8 second mark, the guy was already hovering over her very closely and then gets RIGHT IN HER FACE, within kissing distance. and during a pandemic. What are the laws about self defense regarding this? Doing that during a pandemic is attempted murder and we all know that masks are not 100%. Was it within her right to take physical defensive action? I would like to know in case this happens to me, I dine out a lot (thanks to Trump's economy) and would like to know what my rights are regarding defending myself against this kind of harassment.
Stay at home! Stay at home! STAY AT HOME! If the owners of businesses where anarchist creeps are allowed to harass customers and make everyone's life hell like we see in this video, then to hell with ever going to THAT place ever again! I'd get up, throw my silverware down on the table, and just walk OUT, immediately, and NEVER come back. Very soon, you'd go back by that business and see it all boarded-up and out of business. I've said it dozens of times, but it bears repeating: "Lock your doors! Load your weapons! Mind your own damn business!" And, for this thread, I'll add: "Never spend a penny at any business where the owners ALLOW anyone to harangue the customers -- about anything!"