Bob Brown - de facto Prime Minister of Australia

Again vitriol for the bastards and nothing for the bastards that came up with a worse plan than the bastards before them.

Not sure how some of you hacks deal with your blatant hypocrisy.

 

..........

 

and your point is .....

 

Jehovah loves everyone my son.....

 

Stockbroker Charles Aitken suggests that the Australian Equities Market
would rise by 10% if Gillard got punted.....I suppose that means that if
Bareback Bob faded into obscurity as well the market would go up by
about 50%....................but who would replace Gillard.....they're all
morons...Bowen couldnt find his arse with both hands....Shorten...
well, enough said...............Rudd....jeeez...not again.....:-

 

How about tony albanese? He`s such a dipstick that I can`t believe they`ve missed him for the leadership of the ALP.

 

If Gillard ever gets punted, the replacement would probably have to seek
Bareback Bobs approval...oh yes...and the Independants as well....what
a wonderful system we have when the leader of Government has to pander
to another mindless, minority party for their support to govern....yes, Mr.
Albanese, we'll support you, but only if you hurry through our legislation......
Government at its worst....

Gimme a break.......

 

After all, the "deal" between the Independents, the Greens and Gillard
was with Gillard...not the Labor Party...if Gillard is replaced, they may lose
power anyway.....hhhmmmm....

 

Point taken. Don`t forget though, if they keep Gillard on as leader, the ALP will almost definitely lose. Democracy`s a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) for the ALP.

 

Great to see Bareback Bob on the 7.30 report tonite saying that we should
take 20,000 refugees....great idea bob...I think they should all be housed
in.....waitforit.......Canberra.....20,000....yeah....right....
Seriously, does he think he is the Messiah or someone....the Head of the
World Order at his very pompous best....

 

How was Labor's plan "worse" ? It was the same bad plan.

Johnny "Children Overboard" started the crap. Labor continued the same crap.

What is hypocritical about agreeing that racist dog-whistling is crap?

 

Why is taking 20,000 refugees a bad idea?

We have an obligation under international law to take refugees. Pretending they don't exist doesn't make them go away.

 

Who will she lose to? Abbott? Who has virtually exactly the same bad refugee policy - except he wants to simply send them to a different island as enormous expense until they all end up here anyway? Abbott, who has exactly the same carbon emission reduction targets a Labour, but only using a more expensive method?

If Gillard is so bad - Why would anyone vote for a party that has virtually exactly the same policies?

 

How is that obvious?

You make this assertion based on what?

How so?

You have yet to establish how or in what way he has or is calling the shots.

 

Don't expect an intelligent reply, just some old rehashed, anti anything that puts people before profits, propaganda.

 

Most people have trouble seeing past their own retirement fund and to ensure that their children have a capital base from which to build.

What kind of society they live in, where their moral base is, whether their children need to make dramatic changes to their lifestyles to maintain their "freedom", usually doesn't enter into their equations.

I will class my life as being successful if through some small contribution I am able to ensure that my grandson can sit around as a grandfather himself and ponder his grandsons future. But from an even more socially, environmentally and politically enlightened position in the future.

I believe a society is judged by how it takes care of those that do not for any of a multitude of reasons have the ability to take care of themselves.

On how it treats and remunerates those without whom we wouldn't have the quality of life. Film stars and singers etc do entertain, but they do not pick up the garbage. If we must we could do without professional entertainers, well maybe do better. Family and neighbourhood entertainment, but could we do without the garbage collectors. Doctors without nurses, we are all in the same ship, if it sinks, we all go.
On how that society can live, love, thrive and grow using all its wonderfully intelligence to create an ever closer partnership to the planet on which we depend so much for life itself.

We have enough for us all to live from well ... to very very well. We can do it and replenish our planet at the same time.
Currently we live from sustenance level (if we are lucky) to obscenely wealthy, oh and we will fix the problems later.

 

Now settle down kiddies...all these negative posts...dear oh dear....
Ill just have to refer to the Scriptures and say "Get thee behind me Satan"

Lets see what a great job Labor and The Greens and the Independants
are doing at the next election...anyone care to put some money where their mouth is and back Labor to win....no, I didnt think so....

 

And so it came to pass in a galaxy far, far away known as Canberra, Queen Juliar
was a little concerned about her finances, so she called all her prophets together
for an urgent meeting.
The prophet known as Bareback Bob (who secretively want to be Queen one day...or should I say THE Queen...) suggested..
"Oh Mighty Queen Juliar, maybe we could take 250 million dollars from the
peoples Futures Fund..."
"Oh Faithful Bob" The Queen responded..."Thats what I was thinking, and we could even take a bit more later, and a bit more even later, as we find it necessary"
"A Great idea, Oh Mighty One" said Bob..."but we will tell the peasants that
it was your idea...just to let them think you are still running the Country"
"Oh, Faithful Bob, you are so wonderful, and your ideas are just like mine...
its a pity you cant sit on my face...sorry throne...with me....as a Laborian..."

Addendum...didnt Costello say the Futures Fund was not to be touched til 2020....jeez I wouldnt like this mob getting their slimy mitts into a Fund created to
fund superannuants payouts...but then again you expect it dont you........

 

Well, hello there again to all my christian friends and welcome to the only
thread on this forum that tells the truth about the moronic Labor Party and
its suck-hole followers (in brackets read here "Tree-huggers and Independents")

News of the day is that in the Gold Coast Bulletin today, it has been reported that membership of the Labor Party is at an all-time catastrophic low...so low
that they are beginning a membership drive to bolster the numbers.

I wonder if the number crunchers stopped and listened...they would then realise that the reason that the numbers are down is that everyone hates
Gillards guts....

I read a story the other day about a punter who took his daughters guinea
pig to the vet because it was crook...(I think it had carbon tax poisoning)
The punter says that the little fellas name is "ginger" and remarks that they
were going to call it "Gillard" but thought who could possibly name anything
"Gillard" The vet responds..."mate, if it was named Gillard, Id use a different
type of needle....".......hilarious.....

God bless you all....particularly those under about 30, who really havnt
any brains just yet............

 

You have yet to substantiate anything asserted in your OP.

 

Seriously, I dont have to substantiate anything, because no matter what I post, no matter what anyone posts/believes/doesnt believe...we are all entitled to our opinions and blind freddie can see that Gillard lied,... and to form government, she did a deal with the Greens..."de facto" means living together and giving the impression of a married couple...hung parliaments dont work my friend, and the average australian can see that unless they
are a blind tree hugger or laborite...oh and finally, if Abbot had to form government with the greens for support, Id have the same opinion....
one party cannot be expected to govern if they are being "held to ransom"
by another party...if you think that Brown has no influence on Gillard, then
youre dumber than I thought..........

 

Yes you do its called the burden of proof.

I didnt say you couldn't have an opinion, I just said, for it to be taken seriously and not laughed at, you need evidence. I'm still waiting, and laughing.

 

Burdon of proof is applied in a court of law...this isnt a court of law....its a bloody forum boofhead.....

Double shoosh.............

 

No its applied to claims that need to be substantiated. In a debate such as this, substation is required. If you dont want to prove your claims, that's fine, but then your comments are just opinionated drivel, worth no more than for me to laugh at them and forget about them.

? Less "shooshing" more evidence.

 

"Substation" is required......you cant even spell it......."substantiation".....
now go and write it 1000 times little boy....