Bob Brown - de facto Prime Minister of Australia

LOL! You cant even speak English!!! haha

substantiation - definition of substantiation by the Free Online ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/substantiation - CachedSimilar
You +1'd this publicly. Undo
sub·stan·ti·ate (s b-st n sh - t ). tr.v. sub·stan·ti·at·ed, sub·stan·ti·at·ing, sub·stan·ti·ates. 1. To support with proof or evidence

Its substantiation. You need to substantiate your claims. Go ahead. I know you cant, which makes this all the more funny. haha

 

You are the one that used the word "substation" in your post, little
boy...I stated the correct word was "substantiation"....peanutbrain...
go and put your dole form in....

 

By the way....on the subject of death tax...if Brown introduces a Death Tax...
lets say its 5%....on an estate of say $500,000.00, the executors would have
to pay $25,000 in death duties....hhhmmm...thats a lot....particularly when you consider Bob Brown is not the PM....but its his policy, not Gillards....
I wonder when this little present will hit the House!!!...makes the $800 to have your house given a Green sticker look like peanuts, doesnt it...???

 

Tell me then, does labor support the death tax? According to your theory of 'green control' it should. Tell me also, why is labor pushing for the Malaysia solution when the Greens ARDENTLY oppose it? Tell me further why the Greens still want civil liberties changes like the right to gay marriage yet Labor also is opposed to this? Tell me, other than the current Carbon Tax legislation, which the Greens RELUCTANTLY accepted, what evidence do you have the Greens control Labor?

 

Open your eyes sonny...jeez, no wonder youve got 10,000 posts at age 19...
you obviously haven't got a job...I have a grandson aged 16...3 years younger
than you...still at school....he knows squat....youre the same.....

 

Oh I have a job, quite a good one actually.

Sure mate, that's why Im kicking your ass. It makes sense your a grandfather - an old guy with a bunch of assumptions but absolutely no clue what he is talking about. You probably listen to Alan Jones and philosophize about everything when you have absolutely no clue of how even the most basic aspects of society function let alone politics. Just admit the fact you have no evidence, you cant respond to any of my questions, and that your case is just as dumb as the imaginary thoughts your 16 year old grandson probably thinks of. Perhaps you should follow him and just keep your ignorance too yourself.

 

yawn yawn....how much do you intend to put on labor to win the next election...with such a good job, maybe a thousand or two......gues what,
sonny....you'd lose it...........

 

Nothing.

LOL That does have anything to do with what I said. You are one delusional old man.


Still no evidence I see.

 

God youre making me tired just reading your crap.....

 

LOL Just give me some evidence and I'll be sweet.

 

Settle down, not every old person is clueless, my father is 95, still looks after himself, drives, gardens, and he could run rings around most of you here with wit.

Do not blame those with outdated ideas on age, go to a young liberals meeting or a national party one in the country. Toy will find lots of young people still in the 40's and 50's politically.

As for this fellow, he has the correct name, a bumbling old man with problems seeing things as they really are!

 

I didn't intend to paint all old folk with the same brush. Look at Noam Chomsky - he's in his 80s and still is writing books, holding more knowledgeable incite then most people can muster within a library.

Yep.

 

I see Parliament has adjourned for two weeks...I wonder if Gillard
will find some brains whilst she's away....or maybe a coup...anything...
pleeease....

 

I see you have an opinion on almost everything, haven't you,...... abortion, christianity, islam....anymore.....and of course...youre opinions are all correct, arent they!!!!....a know-it all.... know-nothing... condescending 19 year old brat that spends all his time on the internet belittling other people, bullying them,
imposing your brilliant opinions on everyone, and refusing to accept you just
may be wrong....oh perish the thought.....!!!!

 

umm... civil liberties, like euthanasia, gay rights, freedom of speech and expression etc, also Israel, US foreign policy, communism, capitalism, many feilds of history (at the moment I'm looking at the rise of the Spanish Empire in the 16th century). There maybe more but I cant think of them currently.

Yes, you know why? Because I've studied these topics. I have EVIDENCE and I have FACTUAL SUPPORT - some thing you lack.

haha, you know I would INSTANTLY support your case, if you could substantiate and prove it. I have changed my mind before. Some notable times were on abortion, some historical events and aspects of capitalism.

 

WOW, an intelligent, well read, educated, thinking and reasonable young man,

"Oh Magoo, you've done it again ...... proved you're bumbling"

 

Um I see you notice, could this be because YOU have opinions on everything, oh yes look you do, OH and your always right too, even when it's blatantly wrong, um LIKE NOW.

much better to be an old guy, that spends all his time on the internet belittling other people, bullying them.

Spoken by a leader in the art.

 

Sorry should supply definitions too.

Intelligent: Thinks for himself, not just parroting Alan Jones
Well Read: Read something, not just listening to Alan Jones
Educated: Knows stuff, not just what he hears on Alan Jones
Thinking: Thinks ... for himself, not what he hears on Alan Jones
Reasonable: Reason Able

 

You got that wrong Dominor baby, it should read;

Intelligent: Thinks for themselves, doesn't just parrot their Labor/Green masters.
Well Read: Reads things, doesn't just listen to their Labor/Green masters.
Educated: Knows stuff, other than what their Labor/Green masters tell them.
Thinking: Thinks for themselves, doesn't just parrot their Labor/Green masters.
Reasonable: Listens and gives consideration to other points of view, not just those of their Labor/Green Masters.

 

1. Why do you call them our "masters"?
2. Do you also believe the Greens 'control' Labor?

 

Because of the way you crawl on your belly and hang your head before begging permission to lick their boots.

What? Where did that come from? What is your opinion?

 

Sorry, they told me they are right out of second prizes, shame you would have won a cupie doll

 

When they have nothing intelligent to say, and there is nothing in the parrot tin, then they resort to meaningless drivel

Anyway Mega even if you were to lick boots, which I am (*)(*)(*)(*) right sure you wouldn't, it's 20 inches or so lower then what they lick.

WOW Did I really resort to their level

mmm I'm BAD

 

I know humour is a difficult concept for you mate but if you keep trying I am sure one day you will begin to undersatand.

 

What do you mean? I voted for the Greens btw, so I guess you'd be licking my boots hehe

I was just asking. Yes or no?

They do not control Labor in the slightest. They influence aspects of its work, but only through use of its Parliamentary and Senate power - not control over Labor as the OP suggests.