Did Hillary Clinton break laws?

Those that support Trump, say, what laws did he break? As if they didn't watch him break them as he went about it.

So, I will ask an obvious question. What laws did Hillary break? We hear how she needs to be imprisoned, and ALL the DEMOCRATS as well, I presume.

On what basis do you judge Hillary worthy of imprisonment, and NOT Trump?

 

Nobody should be imprisoned without a conviction by a jury of his or her peers.

 

Hillary conspired with Russia to create a hoax in order to effect a US election.

She laundered campaign funds through Perkins Coie and FusionGPS to illegally employ a foreign national, Christopher Steele, in her campaign.

As Secretary of State, she accepted bribes for Foreign Countries. She shook down Saudi Arabia for $10M to approve the sale of fighter jets. She then accepted a $900K commission check from Boeing.

Under Hillary, our foreign policy was for sale.

 

Yet our president does nothing about it or the Justice dept.

 

"Hillary conspired with Russia to create a hoax in order to effect a US election."





"She laundered campaign funds through Perkins Coie and FusionGPS to illegally employ a foreign national, Christopher Steele, in her campaign."
Deutsche Bank, Trump’s Sugar Daddy, Raided by Police on Suspicion of Money Laundering
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/11/deutsche-bank-raided-money-laundering

Russian Lawyer At Trump Tower Meeting Charged In Connection To Money Laundering Case
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/08/6832...ng-charged-in-connection-to-money-laundering-





"As Secretary of State, she accepted bribes for Foreign Countries. She shook down Saudi Arabia for $10M to approve the sale of fighter jets. She then accepted a $900K commission check from Boeing."
Trump hotel in New York got a huge revenue boost from Saudi crown prince's entourage, report says
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/03/sau...-at-trumps-new-york-hotel-reversing-drop.html

Here Are the Ways Trump Cashes In on Being President
https://www.cheatsheet.com/money-career/all-the-ways-trump-cashes-in-on-the-u-s-presidency.html/

 

Comey clearly outlined the laws she broke but decided to become the DOJ and of course the Obama admin played along.

 

In other words, you have nothing on Trump except that, as an international businessman, he has had international business dealings.

The theory of disparate impact that was waved around by Holder can be used to zero in on theft in office by Barack Obama and Hillary:

1. How much was Obama worth when he was first elected?

2. How much was he worth when he left office?

How much did he gain by self-dealing in office? = 2 - 1

3. How much were the Clintons worth when Hillary became SOS?

4. How much were the Clintons worth when Hillary left office?

How much did the Clintons gain by self-dealing in office? = 4 - 3

All the evidence points to Trump's business losing money while he was in office. He also donated his Presidential salary. Did Obama donate his salary? Hillary?

Mueller spent $30M + and found nothing. If the Southern District of NY found anything, they would have leaked like a sieve. Crickets.

Stay away from sharp objects.

 

Did the bear crap in the woods? Is the Pope catholic? Comey told us she broke laws.

 

I know for sure that Hilary broke the law. She kept an unsecured server that was used to transmit, receive and store classified information. That is against the law.

I have seen no absolute proof that Trump has broke the law. Maybe he has, maybe he has not.

 

Clinton only serves as an increasingly feeble attempt at diversion from the plight of trumpery. Republicans controlling the executive and both houses of congress for two years, and a relentless Republican jihad by house committees before that, could contrive no pretext for any indictments.

If she dropped a 40 killo block of lime Jello® off of a 4-story building onto Vince Foster's noggin, she got away with it.

 

The problem with you opinion is that she was violating the law at the same time that Trump was being accused of violating the law. She got away with a severe case of security violation because she "did not intentionally break security laws". Never in all my years of dealing with security was ignorance of the procedures used as an excuse to violate the laws dealing with security.

 

18 USC 793(f). That's a felony and not the least of her crimes.

 

All liberal sources. No surprise.

 

Sorry to say but Hillary was a terrible candidate for the corporate wing of the Democratic Party. The Clinton's history of criminality goes back a long way - back to the Arkansas days. But like most US presidents, notably both of the Bushes, that criminality gets explored in show investigations where hands are slapped and subordinates punished then pardoned and then discarded from media attention and the public eye.

Nature of the US government which actually runs as much like a criminal syndicate. Trump is merely the latest iteration.

 

Stop pretending. You know what laws she broke.

 

Hillary is toxic. She may very well have broken laws.

Every law that Hillary broke and everything that Hillary is does not excuse one single law that Trump broke or may have broken. One thing does not impact the other.

 

It's the double standard that's the problem.

In Hillary's case crimes were investigated and proven, yet the perpetrator (Hillary) wasn't even charged...in Trump's case he, not crimes has been investigated in search of a crime, the classic definition of fishing expedition/witch hunt.

Hillary's associates got immunity in exchange for nothing, Trump's associates got perjury traps and financial destruction, Hillary's aides blatantly lied to the FBI and were allowed to destroy evidence, Trump's aides were threatened and blackmailed with prison terms for their wives and children.

Can you spot a double standard?

 

Your pretending that she was violating the law the same time your messiah was being accused of violating the law is amusing.

Pissy Trump bum-kissers blindly believe their ideological media entertainers' raving about Clinton's criminality, and yet cannot explain why years of Republican-run Congressional investigations, and Republicans controlling all branches of government for two years have not been able to contrive a single indictment against her.

The nation has moved on, and it is now Trump who is enjoying such scrutiny.

 

All of which you have proof of nothing. If you did, after all the "Lock her up" chants and in control of all branches, you would have strung her up. Total BS.

 

Oh please
Name one politician that served more than one term that left office with less than they came in with.

 

And Trump got rid of Comey and did what? Let me help....nothing. THAT, he's good at.

 

Boy, this is so convincing, and stuff!

 

Yes, she did.

 

Wow, I'm even more convinced now. Such a detailed and compelling analysis!

 

I'd be worried about prosecuting and jailing top/senior politicians/nominees for their malfeasance in office. I worry that it would create an incentive for incumbents to become tyrants for life, afraid of the consequences of peacefully surrendering power. "Show me then man, I will show you the crime". They can invent things for anyone at any time. I assume there must be a line one could eventually cross, but even in HRC's instance, even NRO said she is corrupt, but corrupt within normal parameters.