Don't Like Gay Pedophilia? Change Your Summer Plans...Boycott California

Slyhunter, you can defend yourself because of what some1 might do, if jury decides you had reasonable belief & used reasonable force . In the G.M. Zimmerman case, if it's prosecuted (which looks like it will be), then a jury has to decide if G.M. Zimmerman had reasonable belief T.B Martin was going to beat him up & if so, was his reaction justified or excessive Jury can acquit or they can convict G.M. Zimmerman of lesser charge of Manslaughter. Most criminal cases including murder are usually pleabargained. The prosecution will likely offer G.M. Zimmerman a pleabargain, but don't think G.M. Zimmerman will accept, so as it's expected the case will be tried.

Most gay bashings are men reacting to crimes the gay & transexual ( worse than gays) did. I would rather have a case where a jury decides if a man's reaction to bashing or killing a gay after the gay did indecent exposure was justified or excess, vs. the man not doing enough & the gay does something worse.A jury decides if it's justified or excess & if excess, then what degree. Self-defense a jury topic after hearing both prosecutor & defense lawyer & jury decides if gay basher used reasonable or excessive force. If the gay has a violent history, then it is relevant because it supports idea that the gay was going to attack the man after harassing the man as the gay had this before. If that teenage boy had tried to walk away, that gay who was much bigger than him would likely have attacked him (possibly homosexual rape) because the gay had a violent history (unreported to cops) of beating up teenager boys after harassing them for sex & these cases unpredictable-that teenager boy would likely have ended up in the hospital. To say that ass grabbing is the only crime the gay was going to do is dishonest. Better to do too much than not enough in cases like that. With that gay, it's highly likely the gay was trying to do something more violent than ass grabbing, so that gay who got his ass whupped like Harvey B. Milk deserve no sympathy for what they did to teenager boys.

 

Who told you this? Rush Limbaugh?

 

No, didn't get this info from Rush H. Limbaugh-rarely listen to him unless sometimes on radio. If you're pro-choice on abortion, then don't complain about my view justifying aborting unborn gays, lesbians and transexuals. I believe world is better without sex change maimings and without gay/lesbian behaviors. I to repeat support abortion if it can be predicted an unborn baby will be deformed such as no arms, no legs, but it must be mom's call. Mainstream psychology has long lost neutrality on the gay/lesbian topic with their pro-gay/lesbian bias that many people don’t trust the APA & AMA. Here, people deny truth about Harvey Bernard Milk being a homosexual statutory rapist. Why people take part in gay/lesbian sexual behaviors can be compared to why people are obese-some people do gay/lesbian behaviors due to childhood sex abuse like some people become obese because they eat poorly & don’t exercise & then some people do gay/lesbian sexual behaviors because possibly it’s due to bad biology possibly a birth defect-we do know that obesity is often related to genes.Harvey B. Milk deserve no sympathy for what he did to teenager boy.

 

I think DENY is not quite the word- I would prefer we point out that your claim is entirely your speculation and that Milk was never accused, charged or convicted of any such crime.

It is entirely possible that Milk was a statutory rapist- just as its possible that Elvis was- but we will never know because everyone is dead.

 

Harvey Milk, along with Mayor Moscone, was cowardly gunned down in cold blood by a coward who snuck through a basement level window and then shot each of them, standing over them after the first shot to shoot them in the head to ensure that they died.

I find your rationalization for the murder of Milk despicable.

 

It's no surprise Black crack smoking lesbian Pam Spaulding sees nothing wrong with Harvey B. Milk committing homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy in 1964.
Harvey B. Milk won't commit any more homosexual statutory rapes. Possible his victim turned out gay because of homosexual statutory rapes. Murder in some cases can be lesser of 2 evils if it prevents some1 from doing worse things. Harvey B. Milk's murder prevented him from committing any more homosexual statutory rapes on underage boys, then yes his murder is the lesser of 2 evils.

 

Harvey Milk, along with Mayor Moscone, was cowardly gunned down in cold blood by a coward who snuck through a basement level window and then shot each of them, standing over them after the first shot to shoot them in the head to ensure that they died.

I find your rationalization for the murder of Milk despicable.

 

Black crack smoking lesbian Pam Spaulding & Squaw Big Island Chronicle's journalist Tiffany C. Edwards Hunt who farts in front of her kids to entertain them both see nothing wrong with Harvey B. Milk committing homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy (possibly while this kid was high as he was a junky) in 1964.
Possible his victim turned out gay because of homosexual statutory rapes. Murder in some cases can be lesser of 2 evils if it prevents some1 from doing worse things. Murder in some cases can be lesser of 2 evils if it prevents some1 from doing worse things as it happened here. Harvey B. Milk won't do any more homosexual statutory rapes on underage boys, so yes his murder is the lesser of 2 evils.

 

Harvey Milk, along with Mayor Moscone, was cowardly gunned down in cold blood by a coward who snuck through a basement level window and then shot each of them, standing over them after the first shot to shoot them in the head to ensure that they died.

I find your rationalization for the murder of Milk despicable.

 

Jeff, seriously... Just ignore it.

 

That's not rebuttal. Either you see something wrong with coward Harvey B. Milk committing homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy in 1964 or you don't.
Possible his victim turned out gay because of homosexual statutory rapes. Regardless, homosexual statutory rapist coward Harvey B. Milk won't commit any more homosexual statutory rapes on underage boys, so yes murdering Harvey Bernard Milk's the lesser of 2 evils.

 

proven lie

 

You've been rebutted. Milk was never arrested, charged or convicted of statutory rape. He never admitted to having underage sex with anyone. You simply infer because there was a relationship that statutory rape took place, despite having no proof. And you go on to suggest his murder was justifiable because you ASSUME he committed a crime he was never convicted of. You're despicable quite frankly.

The fact remains that sex with 16 year olds is permitted in the majority ( 28 ) states. Thus, your assertion this is somehow a disgusting crime and perversion flies in the face of the majority of US law. A 16 year old is perfectly capable of consenting to sex.

 

States & some nations have lower minimum age for sex, but while it's legal, it's still bad-being legal doesn't change that's wrong. Homosexual statutory rapist coward Harvey B. Milk committed homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy (possibly while this kid was high as he was a junky) in 1964. Possible his victim turned out gay because of homosexual statutory rapes. Harvey B. Milk also bragged about having sex in park but never being caught by the police-he asked other boys for sex in the bathroom. Harvey B. Milk won't do any more homosexual statutory rapes on underage boys, so yes his murder is the lesser of 2 evils.

 

That you continue to promote murder of homosexuals and in particular the cowardly murder of Harvey Milk is disgusting.

 

I should REALLY listen to my own advice and ignore you, we've done this dance a million times.

I'm only going to say it once more: Harvey Milk was never arrested or charged on suspicion of, or for that matter convicted of statutory rape. Neither did he admit to having sex with the boy when he was underage. If you do not KNOW such a thing took place (I'm certain you weren't spying on Milk in NY in the 1960s...), then you cannot say he did that. Even if you think a man sleeping with a boy of 16 is immoral and somehow worse than murder, you cannot say he deserved to be assassinated based on an assumption. There's simply no proof.

 

I suspect you think 16 year olds can consent as long as they are heterosexual. In fact, the entire point is moot as I think if funinsnow were in charge, s/he would ban homosexuality all together, so there wouldn't even be an "age of consent" for gay people.

 

<<< MODERATOR EDIT: OFF TOPIC >>> Consent age should be 18 & only straight sexual behaviors. Straight statutory rape whether it's man doing it with teenage girl or woman doing it with teenage boy are both bad and deserve = punishment. Homosexual statutory rape is worse because many gays were victims of homosexual statutory rape in youth and this causes adult homosexual conduct & transexuality. It's undebatable truth that if a person's a victim of childhood sex abuse, then it's more likely they'll will do gay/lesbian conduct & transexuality repeating what he learned. Many gay child molesters were victims of homosexual rapes when they were boys such as by gay priests. Punishment for sex abuse should be more when it's gay/lesbian & transexual. Abolish transexuality.

Another gay bashing case many years ago in Arizona. What had happened was that an 18 year old boy had been in a park with friends. A gay who was much bigger than him grabbed the boy&#8217;s butt & made a sex comment. The boy then told his 2 friends. After this, the 2 men grabbed the gay, brought him to the boy who then hit the gay several times in the face. That &#8216;gay bashing&#8217; victim committed a crime-assault&battery & boy reacted by bashing him. That gay likely had a violent history, so if that teenage boy had tried to leave, that gay would likely have attacked him because the gay&#8217;s history of beating up teenager boys after harassing them for sex & these cases unpredictable. If the homosexual is high on drugs (many gays drugjunkies) such as cocaine as that gay possibly was then it's likely the gay would've done more violent crime in a cocaine rage if indeed the gay was high.
Self-defense is a jury topic after hearing both prosecutor & defense-jury decides if gay basher used reasonable or excessive force. If the gay has a violent history, then it is relevant because it supports idea that the gay was going to attack the man after harassing the man as the gay had this before. I would rather have a case where a jury decides if a man's reaction to bashing or killing a gay after the gay did indecent exposure was justified or excess, vs. the man not doing enough & the gay does something worse. If the jury acquits the gay basher, then it's legal & not murder.Harvey B. Milk committed homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy (possibly while this kid was high as he was a junky) in 1964. Possible his victim turned out gay because of homosexual statutory rapes. Harvey B. Milk also bragged about having sex in park but never being caught by the police-he asked other boys for sex in the bathroom. Harvey B. Milk won't do any more homosexual statutory rapes on underage boys, so yes his murder is the lesser of 2 evils.

 

I find your rationalization and advocacy for the murder of homosexuals to be disgusting. I find your enthusiasm for the cowardly murder of Harvey Milk to be even more disgusting.

 

For straights only? So in other words you think homosexuality shouldn't have an AoC because you want it made illegal at any age, am I right?
(*)

The statistics on that are murky and inconsistent at best. I also doubt you have any sources for such a bold claim as you NEVER back yourself up.
A 16 year old is already well-aware of his or her sexual orientation by that age, so how you work out it could "turn" someone gay is beyond me. A young pre-pubescent child may be influenced sexually by being abused while young, but a 16 or 17 year old? You're having a laugh. That's the age they're out trying to get some with the gender they KNOW they like.(*)

The rest of your post is just irrelevant, droning copy-and-paste crap followed by more of the same on Milk. You think he deserved death for something you don't even know he did. What a vile, disturbed excuse for a human being you are.

 

Again, you say you'll ignore me, yet you reply again. If the decided to make gay/lesbian behaviors a crime again, then I'm not going to lose sleep over this. They must find cure for gayism, lesbianism & transexuality, then the need for laws against gay/lesbian behaviors is a moot point. They must abolish sex change mutilations.

Gays are child molesters or homolesters such as Jerry Sandusky & the priests who homolest boys-they are homosexuals. 33% of gays report homosexual rape in youth. Many gays and lesbians who commit suicide do so because they often were childhood sex abuse victims and many have other copathologies such as antisocial conduct, drugs, etc. Sex abuse especially homosexual rape in youth is major cause of homosexual behaviors-to deny it is dishonest, delusional or both. It remains to be seen how many of Jerry Sandusky's victims think they're gay because of this. Homosexual/lesbian sexual behaviors are bad for health often as result of childhood sex abuse though there possibly other causes such as birth defect though they've not conclusively proven gayism's inborn. Homosexual statutory rapist coward Harvey B. Milk committed homosexual statutory rape on a 16 year old boy (possibly while this kid was high as he was a junky) in 1964. Possible his victim turned out gay because of homosexual statutory rapes. Harvey B. Milk also bragged about having sex in park but never being caught by the police-he asked other boys for sex in the bathroom.

 

You don't prove anything you say, that's one of the reasons I'm tempted to put you on ignore. That and the fact you NEVER say anything new, you copy and paste the same crap over and over, you provide absolutely zero sources, and when someone challenges you on anything you either repeat the very point you were challenged on and claim no one has rebutted you, and/or go off on an irrelevant tangent with more **** from that little homophobic notepad file of yours. Your posts are poorly written and strung together peices of garbage. That ANYONE still responds to you is a miracle quite frankly, but unless you change and provide some sources for your ridiculous claims, I'm not going to give you anymore of my time.

 

please cite your evidence for this statement. <<< MODERATOR EDIT: INAPPROPRIATE COMMENT >>>

 

You've already seen the evidence. They were lovers.

 

Whether he broke the actual law or not we can only speculate. Personally I see nothing wrong with a 16 year old consenting to sex, and neither do 28 / 50 states and the vast majority of the western world.