Every lawyer knows it will be a mistrial - guaranteed

It is unbelievable that the people who claim to be rational, reasonable, and more just than white people, can not see through the junk mail that their leaders are sending them. Rachel Jeantel's "lawyer," Rod Vereen, is either a stooge, or a state plant to sabotage Rachel Vereen's lying. First he claims that they could not prepare Rachel Jeantel for cross-examination, because they could not determine what questions the defense would ask. Please, any lawyer who is worth the weight of his jurisprudence diploma can put together a line of questioning for any witness for any case - that is apart of law school. I agree that public defenders are well versed in explaining to their clients that they cannot put together a defense and that they had better take the plea agreement and start serving their time, but if a case goes to trial the lawyers have to put together a decent defense.

Mr. Vereen's excuses for Jeantel are just silly, and meant to pander to ignorant people - blacks. Later in his Piers Morgan interview, he explains that the defense attorney, Don West, heard a deposition of Jeantel! What more preparation for trial testimony does she need?

The court procedure has avoided adequately explaining what happened when police found Trayvon's cell phone. If you were a cop in such a situation what are you going to do with his phone? Wait until someone calls, and trace the numbers in the memory - right? Trayvon's people do not file a report until the next morning, and that is supposed to be acceptable for a wonderful and innocent child like Trayvon Martin???

Rachel Jeantel testified that she believed that Trayvon got into a fight and that it was "no big deal, because he was near his daddy's home." She said she called back once and Trayvon did not answer. Her lawyer, Rod Vereen is claiming that she loved Trayvon, because he was kind to her, and did not make fun of her; but for some reason she is not concerned about his well being beyond not getting a response from him after she believed he got into a fight??? And we are supposed to accept that that is because black people are afraid to call the police, because they are afraid they are going to get arrested; yet we are supposed to be understanding when they call 911, because they did not get French fries in their Happy Meal???

From testimony we learn that Trayvon's mother checked out Jeantel several days after Trayvon's funeral; police probably told Trayvon's mother to request a written document. Jeantel gives her a letter that she claims in testimony that she cannot read, because she doesn't read cursive, and we are supposed to be understanding. In response to her seeming illiteracy, Vereen claims she speaks three languages, but she does not have an accent??? Jeantel probably wrote something to the effect that she stopped talking to Trayvon early in the timeline, probably when he was at the store where he told her what he had bought, as she wrote in the letter and was found at the scene - when was that information publicly released, before or after the letter? So, when Jeantel testified in court that she was talking to Trayvon further on down the timeline (at the mailbox area), Trayvon's mother realized that Jeantel is lying; and she knows to suspect that she heard the whole thing, slipping and falling on the wet grass, the cries for help, and then the gun shot.

Again, why was Rachel Jeantel not concerned about what happened to the fight that she figured Trayvon got into that was no big deal because it was near his father's house? Why did she have a lot of calls and texts messages with him and then discontinued around the time of the homicide?

It is a mistrial by design, that is why the defense attorney, Don West, did the "knock-knock" joke,and there have been other disorderly procedures, because they are trying to extract the truth from Jeantel; eventually she will confess. It is a real shame that we have to go through this, and it is not going to look good for all the celebrities who have pledged their allegiance in championing Trayvon Martin and Rachel Jeantel as being innocent children. The whole world is watching this trial and they are not as dumb as the people who believe Rachel Jeantel.

Obama in flight to Africa during Rachel Jeantel's testimony - coincidence???

 

and there getting prepared for the other guarantee of riots
http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/07...king-like-riots-after-zimmerman-verdict-79110

 

There will not be riots -- too many people have guns and black people know what happens when they mess with an hispanic guy with a firearm. Cannot riot if you are dead.

 

There's a noticeable stench of bigotry on this thread.

 

Yes the trayvonites are getting out of control .

 

I don't think there will be any riots. Of course, I don't think there will be an acquittal or mistrial either.

 

What is this? Few of the facts are accurate. Is there a link? Who wrote it?

 

I don't see any basis for a mistrial.

Any verdict other than an acquittal would require a 100% packed jury. I don't see that either. Too much scope for ol' Murphy to foul it up.

It should be a directed verdict of not guilty by reason of self-defense, but the case is probably too politicized for the judge to do that.

It will be either an acquittal or a hung jury.

If it is a hung jury, do they re-try the case?

 

This is another demonstration of right wing hate. Nothing like making fun of a murdered child. Right wing talks about liberal or minority hate I think some of you need to look in the mirror and come to terms with your racist point of views. I think george is a child killing coward, however it is not up me it is up to the jury to decide if that is true or not. I believe some of racist want him to get off so u can start fights with young black men and when you start to get the ass whipped you can pull out your guns and shot. If your a coward without a gun your still a coward with one.

 

Bigotry is what brought the case to trial!!!! The bigotry of those who want to lynch Zimmerman.

 

a 17 year old who would attack a grown man who was simply following him through a neighborhood is not acting as a child. There was never any evidence that this was anything other than a self defense shooting, but race baiting bigots pushed this to trial embarrassing the state of Florida and the prosecutors office severely!

 

I think the title should be "Every lawyer knows it should be a mistrial or acquittal, but so knows with a jury of six females?"

 

When prominent defense attorneys like Mark Garagos publicly state that the judge should direct a verdict of not guilty, you know there was no evidence against George AT ALL!

- - - Updated - - -

There will be one or the other. The state has failed to meet the standards of the law they charged George under!

 

How many persons on the jury - six??? Are you kidding me? A murder trial with only six jurors!!!

Did you notice how the defense attorney made it clear to Rachel Jeantel that he could not see her if he was sitting in his chair? Obviously, the accused was not allowed to face his accuser.

If a lawyer starts off with a knock-knock joke, you have to question his competency.

They're going to convict him, and eventually Jeantel will fess-up to the undercover cops assigned to follow her, and then they will declare a mistrial and try her for obstruction.

View attachment 20710

 

For every person who believed Zimmerman was automatically guilty solely due to Martin's skin color, there were just as many (if not more) conservative retards who believed Zimmerman was automatically innocent solely due to Martin's skin color.

It's very amusing to see conservative posters on this forum--many who hold pro-segregationist/pro-slavery/rabidly anti-black racist beliefs--pretend as though they decided Zimmerman was innocent due to the facts of the case. Seeing conservative racists hop on the Zimmerman bandwagon because it looks like he will not be found guilty is absolutely hilarious, given that their "he's innocent" belief exists only due to their utter contempt of african americans.

 

Genius - We are approaching a robot-served society. Nobody wants Aunt Jemima sitting in their kitchen or watching their children. You liberals need everything explained to you.

 

Quick question for the legal eagles out there. Zimmerman's parents were asked to leave the courtroom during the trial because they were potential witnesses, yet the Martins (or whatever their last names are) were allowed to stay even though we know Sybrina wil be called as a witness. Was it because O'Mara didn't ask that they be removed so as to not upset the jury over seeming to be mean to the grieving parents?

 

And watching white-guilt mentally-deficient ******* posts is mildly entertaining as well.

Especially as the Defense eviscerates the Prosecution's arguments.

Liberalism is a mental disease.

The carnage resumes tomorrow ................

 

The defense's case only needs one witness: Zimmermann.
The photos of his injuries corroborate.

He says:
"The guy sucker-punched me and knocked me down. He was pounding my head on the pavement. I feared for my life, so I shot him."

I don't see how the prosecuting attorney has any leverage to make him discredit himself.

Maybe a physician who states the injuries are consistent with Zimmermann's story.

And the defense rests.

He has a story. The state had one but their witnesses discredited that story.

Zimmermann wins 1-0. Open and shut

BTW. Lawyers say if you have the law, pound the law. If you have the facts, pound the facts. If you don't have the law or the facts, pound the table.

Zimmermann has the law and the facts (as presented in a court of law). PF Trayvonites have neither.

 

I run away when I see black people. I won't start a fight with one. I'm afraid of them.

 

This prosecution isn't about Martin or Zimmerman. It's about the search of black people for justice. The problem is that black people are too emotional to realize that this is not a good case for their cause.

 

No. O'Mara did ask. But the Courts are lenient with the family of the "victim", even if they are listed as possible witnesses.

 

The height of delusion :crazy" He will walk.It might not even get to the jury as thye Pros didn't prove their case!

 

I do not subscribe to slavery, or anti-black. I do, however, subscribe to segregation. I am very confident that white people can perpetuate community and society without black people; I do not believe black people can generate, or perpetuate, community without white people's help. I believe black people need to accept this, so we can help them generate and perpetuate their communities; otherwise, they need to prove me wrong.

Nelson Mandela is going to die having realized that black people cannot do what he wanted to prove to the world that they could do - run a country. For the people who were taught that the United States was founded by unjust slave owners, it should not be that difficult to realize that a just constitution needs to be written. As of about a year ago, black people forfeited the opportunity to deliver that just constitution. Black people will never be able to claim that they taught the world how to be peaceful and prosperous. The best that black people will ever be able to prove is that they can follow the system that white man has delivered.

 

That's better than killing an unarmed child