you are correct and i will add this case is hurting the legitimate cause for equality and justice for blacks. they should reject it and the dishonest people who support it. - - - Updated - - - rachel jeantel is telling lies. her demeanor and expressions show that. i work and live around people like her everyday. she is telling lies.
Well a jury of six, does favor the prosecution. That's six less that they have to convince. Six less than be that one vote to hang a jury.
A 29-year old man who follows a 17-year-old around at night for no apparent reason and smart-mouths the kid when he catches up to him is not acting like an adult. He is acting like a boy-bumper and needs his danglies broken. Horse hockey. There is evidence on the call to the police that the little psychopath had gone over the edge because people he had called in to report ever got arrested. To his goblin-possessed mind, they had all escaped out the back gate when, in reality, the police had generally found that he was sending them to chase down innocent neighbors. Go back and listen to the tapes without your Rushblob-approved ear muffs. Yes, I am worried a little bit about riots. I am not sure that the creepy azz crackas are going to take it calmly when fat boy goes off to be Big Bubba's sex toy for the next twenty years.
If you believe that the ability to self-govern is genetic, you need to go learn some real history. Kenya does quite nicely, thank you very much. All white people did for most of Africa was to beat black people into submitting to their misrule and plundering or their resources.
lol Simply doing what he was told not to do. Then someone died that wouldn't have if he hadn't followed. See how George cannot be considered completely innocent here?
There will be no mistrials, acquittals, etc., etc. George Zimmerman will be convicted of second-degree murder and sent to prison. Whenever there's a black against white issue, the court always rules in favor of black. It's the law of the land.
And why couldn't blacks defend themselves, and protect their resources - too busy writing the just laws for the world??? I will bet that more Kenyans are immigrating to the USA, than Americans immigrating to Kenya; and Kenya borrows more money from the USA than the USA borrows from Kenya.
If there are riots, then a martial law containment policy would be best. If they want to burn down their own section 8 housing, fine. But, no more protest than that should be allowed. The liquor & gun stores should be putting their stock on trucks and getting the booze/guns out of the ghetto. That would calm things down quite a bit.
They also asked him where the guy went. A suggestion is not a command and the suggestion had no weight other than so far, it has been proven that he complied with both "suggestions".
If we are going to contain it to their neighborhood (segregation), why not give them guns and ammo so they can defend themselves, and cull the herd of the riff-raff???
Watch the trial, he was NEVER told not to do that. You are lying. Nobody would be dead had Trayvon just gone home ads the testimony has proven repeatedly he had more than enough time to do. Why did he attack Zimmerman?
Evidence, shmevidence! Who cares about "evidence, proof, justice", etc.? All dat matters is we gwine git dat cracker!
There should have never been a trial. This D.A. should lose her job. Zimmerman should have got Criminal Negligence at worst or whatever the equivalent is in Florida. Here is a quick question to ask yourself. If Zimmerman did not have a gun and Trayvon did what he did, would Trayvon be arrested for assault and battery?
Exactly what I have been looking for. I apologize in advance for not properly accrediting the argument to you, when I use it in the future; but I'll try - HBSurfer from the Political Forums.
Haven't you ever heard, two wrongs, don't make a right??? Zimmerman brought a gun to a fist fight, and he used it; and that ain't right!
Thanks for the attribution. I will admit... Zimmerman is no prize. I think he is a jackhole, but he had the right to carry.
I admit I missed a lot. What is the explanation for how Z got his gun out of his right hip holster with Trayvon sitting on top of him beating his face?
Easy. He just did it. It is certainly not impossible. And all evidence shows that he was on the ground, Trayvon on top, and that he did it.
What is the alternative? He had his gun drawn all along, held on to it during the beating, and not let Trayvon notice it, and then after the second punch he points and shoots into his chest??? I think if Trayvon is skilled enough to fight a man brandishing a gun, he is skilled enough to take, or kick, the gun away.
So you think whites are going to riot because a Hispanic goes to jail for killing a black kid? Precedence is not on your side. Besides...
5 mothers. I find it strange that the defense would contend that Trayvon's mother's testimony was serving herself but not Z's mother's testimony. I will say again. I would never presume that jury would come to any specific conclusion (no matter my opinion), but I would say that anyone who can't see the prosecution's side has been watching/listening to biased people. For instance, on foxnews, I watched the prosecution show that Z walked past a visible address on his way to supposedly get an address on the next block. This goes to Z's credibility. When it went back to the talking heads, no one mentioned it. They seemed to purposely avoid mentioning any evidence in favor of the prosecution. Reminded me of how they tried so hard to believe that the election could go either way.
You really think that Z was just looking to murder someone walking around that night? I haven't listened to very much of it either....but from what I did see, the prosecution sure wasn't having any success proving it.