Fems - should brothels and hooking be legalised - 100%?

Rent or lease or buy (marriage), that's the beauty of capitalism. If there is a perceived need in a niche market then entrepreneurs will attempt to fill the -- er -- void.

 

...and that's their choice

 

Which is relevant how exactly .. often wondered what certain people think the value of a child is .. would you care to tell me?

 

I have heard it called, do what you love and the money will follow.

 

Yep; a vocation is fine but a paid avocation is even better . . .

 

Why in the world should it be illegal to sell something that it's perfectly legal to give away?? You would be under no obligation to participate, so it's none of your damn business. Of course it should be legal.

 

I don't think you're understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying it's the woman's choice to take custody of the child because of biased family/divorce courts men don't get that choice.

 

Yes, they do.

 

and this is based on outdated historical precedence, it is still assumed that a woman will make a better custodian of children than a man .. do I agree with it, not in the slightest .. The decision should be based on what is best for the child and nothing else.

 

http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/en...-20130314.html
Data analysis suggests that women who fail to pay all of their child support are incarcerated only one-eighth as often as men with similar violations. Several possible explanations of these results other than gender bias are unsupported by the data, strengthening the view that gender bias against fathers is a major factor in the family courts.
A new report concludes that between 95% and 98.5% of all incarcerations in Massachusetts sentenced from the Massachusetts Probate and Family Courts from 2001 through 2011 have been men. Moreover, this percentage may be increasing, with an average of 94.5% from 2001 to 2008, and 96.2% from 2009 through 2011. It is likely that most of these incarcerations are for incomplete payment of child support.

Paternity fraud rampant in U.S.
30% of those named as fathers
bilked of child support unjustly

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2006/02/34861/#CwU3C9I9FR1CzCMJ.99

Courts force boys to pay child support to their statutory rapists (women).
http://www.ageofconsent.com/comments...rthirtysix.htm

 

Because I'm only interested in the Women serving Men part.

- - - Updated - - -

Well if you can get that gig, then fair play to you! But for most of us it's usually the other way around

 

Sadly, I don't think the historical precedence is outdated, it's alive and flourishing in the 21st century. I have known many families and the child care is seldom 50-50, the woman has a larger burden, is more aware of, more knowledgeable about, the needs of children....men are excused...

How many stay-at-home-Dads get society's respect ...especially from righties who insist it is a woman's PLACE to be in the home and have the babies...and then scream and whine about how the courts aren't "fair" to men

 

I would like to take this time and opportunity to "blame the right" for insisting on the Iron Age moral of "work or die" instead of the moral goodness of bearing true witness to our own laws regarding the concept of employment at will, and unemployment compensation that is not denied and disparaged in at-will employment States as that form of "attainder" upon labor who may be the least wealthy under our form of Capitalism regardless of our form of Socialism and enumerated by our Founding Fathers as our republican form of Government.

 

It is

If you're going to pontificate, you should at least know what you're talking about.

 

It a throwback to the time when woman were expected to be the lesser in a relationship, it was their job to be the good little housewife who abided by her husbands wishes regardless of the consequences .. the law and societies attitudes have been slow to change in this respect.

It is nothing more than an assumption of the premise, appeal to history and appeal to common practice fallacies that a woman will be the better parent for a child.

 

I quite probably have a better understanding than you do.

 

This is your understanding:

...and this is based on outdated historical precedence, it is still assumed that a woman will make a better custodian of children than a man .. do I agree with it, not in the slightest .. The decision should be based on what is best for the child and nothing else.



You have nothing to worry about, because the law agrees with you.



In cases of divorce, the court of jurisdiction for the divorce proceedings also determines child custody arrangements. Under the common statutory provision, if the spouses have children together while married, the parents have joint guardianship over that child and the parental rights are equal. Each parent has an equal right to the custody of the child when they separate.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Child_custody

and

When determining the home in which to place the child, the court strives to reach a decision in "the best interests of the child." A decision in "the best interests of the child" requires considering the wishes of the child's parents, the wishes of the child, and the child's relationship with each of the parents, siblings, other persons who may substantially impact the child's best interests, the child's comfort in his home, school, and community, and the mental and physical health of the involved individuals.

 

Very sexist.

 

The numerous cases disagree with you.

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/08/15/latest-u-s-custody-and-child-support-data/

 

The law agrees with me. That blogger is making stuff up, which is not surprising as he dislikes women.

 

Every single thing in that article has links to the relevant data.

So here are the links to that data contained within the article

http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/childsupport/cs07.html
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/p60-237.pdf - pdf of data

You can extrapolate the data yourself and create the charts, if you find any discrepancies or manipulation of the data let us know.

 

The law and how those laws are applied are two different things

 

Not at all. Provide me with a reliable source.

- - - Updated - - -

It's an anti women blog

The data proves only that it's mostly women who care for children.

It contains no background information.