So why did you tell a lie and write: Semantics has nothing to do with it. You posted a statement that was clearly and demonstrably untrue. Real people who live in the real world deal with real life generally don't make statements that are clearly demonstrably untrue. But you did. Why did you do it? It is people who dodge around, hiding from reality, going nowhere & trying to take others nowhere with them that make statements that are clearly demonstrably untrue. Just as you have done. Why did you do it? Any explanation? Or will you avoid the question again?
Are you HENESTLY trying to tell us that La Nina and El Nino are not recognised by people such as the BOM?
Obviously neither do you The problem is GLOBAL and so must the solutions be GLOBAL One fifth of the present climate change is down to deforestation - and most of that is occurring in the third world So, what projects here, would increase the forest cover of the world? Perhaps digging a channel between the Spencer gulf and Lake Eyre?
Bugs, in all sincerity, you do do have a habit of playing around in trivial side issues / non issues. The adults will always lose interest in empty, go nowhere dialogue. Bugs, I haven`t seen your answer to this question that I put to you some time ago. What is the spin dodge on Julia Gillard lying about her loyalty to Kevin Rudd on the leadup to the 2010 backstab? Just curious to see how this one can be twisted around.
Why did you post a lie? You wrote: Could you explain why you posted that - or apologise to the forum for attempting to mislead it. Don't try to change the subject. You need to explain to the forum why you told a lie. And upon being shown you have told a lie - why you refuse to acknowledge such
free2ride you got caught out telling lies and now won't own up to it. How is that adult conversation?
Red herring? Or refusing to step on to the go nowhere, semantic roundabout that dodgy people try to get everyone to ride on. The roundabout doesn`t take you anywhere though, it just keeps going around and around, to nowhere. Problem with the dodgy roundabout is, the truth can`t be avoided for ever.
Huh? Bugalugs simply asked you to acknowledge the fact that you made a wrong statement. The only roundabout here is resulting from your consistent deflection from this simple request. I don't even care really. I just thought it was blatantly dishonest.
Nup, bugs tried to downgrade the debate to the go nowhere, semantic dead end. Some losers employ this stalling tactic, when they can`t hold an adult conversation.
LOL!!! Spin it however you like. You got caught out and have been desperately making ad homs and trying to change the subject ever since. The only person stalling and deflecting here is you. You guys have no sense of irony.
If this was a genuine carbon tax then why is the troll queen giving 3% of the revenue raised by the carbon tax to the UN? Any why has the troll queen not committed 100% of the revenue raised to building and funding 100% green sustainable projects in Australia?
Asking you to explain why you posted a lie is " downgrading the debate"?!?!? You wrote: You were shown to be 100% wrong. A grown-up would admit it. But some losers employ this stalling tactic, when they can`t hold an adult conversation Why can't you admit you told a lie?
Have you been following any of this? It isn't a genuine carbon tax. Just as she said. There would be no carbon tax under a government she leads. She was right. We have instead a watered down ETS. I assume - if you really want a carbon tax, as I do - you will be voting Green next election.
