Gays once again display intolerance toward opposing viewpoints

A group who was holding a meeting had some attendees attacked by intolerant gay protesters. Once again it shows where the real intolerance exists.

linky

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_...ay_Minnesota_Event_Sees_Two_Glitter_Bombings/

Antigay Minnesota Event Sees Two Glitter Bombings
By Winston Gieseke

At the Minnesota Faith and Freedom Coalition, a strategy session for politicians seeking to rewrite the state’s constitution to ban marriage equality, two politicians found themselves showered with glitter by members of a group calling themselves The Glitterati.

The first glitter assault occurred as congressman Erik Paulsen was presented with a “Friend of the Family” award for his efforts to legalize antigay values.

“You’re no friend to my family!” Michael Cahill said, as he unleashed the colorful dust.

 

Nothing new. Gay facists are always vocal spewing their intolerance. Cue Palin's daughters treatment. Only one pro gay person on this board condemned it. Tells you all you need to know.

 

I believe it's backfiring. Most people could care less what anyone does in their bedroom. It's actually hysterical to watcha group toss out labels such as "intolerant" when they are the ones to toss glitter or call for employment termination on those with different opinions.

 

So you're saying gays should be tolerant of those who are so intolorent of gays that they feel the need to ensure they don't get equal treatment under the law? Seriously do you expect not to get bit while tugging on a dogs tail?

 

Wow gay bombs! They toss out rainbow color confetti, I love it.

 

More evidence of the "tolerant left".

 

It's hilarious that you have to tell them that.

I've warned more than a few old-heads in this forum, that gay people aren't going to tolerate the hateful BS for all time.

I think live and let live ...is the way to go about now.

 

Why do people who hate gay people group them up as if gays represent one kind of person with one set of opinions?

I could go up to some hetero dude who disagrees with me and say the heteros are displaying intolerance towards opposing viewpoints and it would make JUST as much sense as this thread.

 

Wow! That is unbelievable! One group demonized by another hellbent on making them second class citizens objects to their attempt to subjugate.

Why don't these gays just accept that folks are attempting to enact laws criminalizing them? They should be happy being denied the same rights and privileges that others have.

 

I'll make it real simple for you.

Tolerance is not what you or the pro gay crowd want. You want acceptance on the same level as heterosexuality without a shred of evidence that the lifestyle is anything more than a choice.

Then you scream and cry comparing homosexuality to the civil rights movement which dealt with race and gender; two proven genetic traits unlike homosexuality.

When this is pointed out you scream every profanity your little heads can muster from bigot (which everyone is) to fascist to homophobe, just because we the majority of the country do not agree with you.

The same biological sexual reaction to sexual stimuli occurs in both gays and straights. The result is the body preparing for procreation which naturally requires heterosexual sex.

When homosexuals stop this process which is genetically driven we can talk about your elevation of homosexuality to a proven genetic condition. Until then it is a mockery of a lifestyle masquerading as a genetic condition without a shred of evidence to support it.

Thats why in straight votes by the people around the nation you are 0-33.

I'll say it again you are 0-33. Deal with it.

 

Why does it have to be genetic for it to not be a choice?

Do you not think that early childhood experiences can shape who someone is, beyond their control?

 

Why do you hate people who don't agree with you?

 

By all means, what else could it be?

Exactly my point.

Some people are naturally rude, shy, excessive, cold, etc because of things that happened in their childhood. Some molest children, beat their spouse, etc. because of something that happened to them when they were a child.

Do we claim all of those groups of people deserve special "rights"?

Of course not. Thank you for that.

 

You just claimed that it was nothing more then a choice.

I fail to see how agreeing with me that it isn't, is "exactly your point."

 

What it actually tells you is the hypocrisy that surrounds Americans with blinkered views of a community they don't know and actively despise, typically performed by whole hearted Christians they profess to be.

 

Who said I hate people who don't agree with me? When did I ever say I hated anyone? Why do you put words in other people's mouths? You're doing that for gays and now for poor old heterosexual me.

 

P.S. if being gay was a choice they could easily choose not to be gay. If you think they can easily choose not to be gay you've never met a gay person and don't know anything about psychology.

If being gay was a choice I dare you to choose to be gay for a day. Then go out and have gay sex and fall in gay love. Then tell me how easy it was for you to just choose to do that. Then on top of that to also choose to go back.

 

Yeah, tossing glitter on straight people is definitely as oppressive as, say, denying equal rights and lynching gay people.

That said, I don't see it as particularly helpful.

 

It helps them be faaabulouuuus!

(lol I'm terrible...)

 

Yes, I think people should be allowed to choose to live how they wish. Is this not America? Should we not be free to choose to live how we wish? Why does it matter if it's genetic or a choice (btw, little experiment, go watch gay porn and tell me it turns you on, kinda makes me uneasy and queezy so I'm pretty sure the urge to suck dick isn't just some choice males make out of the blue). Here's the problem with you is that you're so full of hate for a group of people you likely don't even know and shouldn't care about that you think it's wrong of them to ask for the same freedom and liberty as everyone else; that somehow treating them as equal under the eyes of the law is wrong solely because you don't like what they do. That's (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up and such reasoning has no place in our legal system.

BTW WTF is 0-33?

 

It was glitter. Big deal. Its not going to harm them in anyway, is it?

 

Minorities tend to be harsh on the majorities that often belittle them.

 

Can I throw glitter on you and have you not be offended? Can I keep on doing it until you do?

 

What would YOU do if a group of lawmakers were sitting around discussing how they would dissolve and ban your family from existing legally?

Would YOU be so "intolerant" you would "react" in some way?

 

If they misinterpret someone else's beliefs as belittling, then that is their problem. They are being entirely too sensitive. That does not give them a right to go around antagonizing those people. Homosexuals make this big fuss about wanting to be accepted but they express no acceptance at all for anyone who is different from them. They are the worst kind of hypocrites.

If a traditionalist/conservative group showed up at a gay pride parade and dumped a bucket of grey confetti on a bunch of homosexuals, do you think they would take a moment to reflect and say, "Okay, touché. You got us. We did do this to you first." No way in hell. They would be screaming for hate crimes prosecution.

Until the gay community can drop the diva fit mentality and learn to respect other people, they don't deserve any respect from anybody.