George Zimmerman uses racial slur in cigar bar

Wow....so ya never understood the growing process and different stages of a human. CHILDREN do not have pubic hair, mensturation, breasts developing, boy's voices changing and all that happens during puberty......physically and mentally, they are growing into adulthood and there's no child-like traits involved.

Ok. So, apparently, when you were 15-17, you tho't of yourself as a 'child'......when I was younger than 15, I was baby-sitting a lot. Imagine that! A 'child' being responsible for other people's kids. When I was 17, I was graduating from HS and preparing to move to a city and living on my own....are you a guy or gal? Do you have kids?

 

Yes, you can claim he "stalked" all you want. But you have nothing to back it up. LOL! He wasn't even charged with it. You're just making things up.

- - - Updated - - -

You're accusing him of a crime. Stalking, is a crime. You said he stalked and then murdered. Thus, you're claiming he committed 1st degree murder. You realize, that this was proven false...right? Literally PROVEN.

You can keep whining all you want. You have nothing to back up your opinion.
re

 

This is it according to the law.

 

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stalk

: to pursue quarry or prey stealthily
: to walk stiffly or haughtily

: to pursue by stalking
: to go through (an area) in search of prey or quarry <stalk the woods for deer>
: to pursue obsessively and to the point of harassment


It fits.

Proven by an all white jury, like in the best of times during the Jim Crow era. It's just how cops get away with their murder on one side, while local governments pay millions and millions in damages per victim accepting a wrong was being made. That fact clearly shows the justice system is just broke.

 

Thank you for proving how pathetic your point is.

LOL the race card? LOL. An all white jury didn't convict the criminal-looking hispanic and you're upset?

Al Sharpton, is that you?

He wasn't even charged with stalking, let alone convicted.

Guess what, the all white Jury doesn't choose who gets charged with what. That's the black and white law enforcement.

Troll on.

 

"A child"
"almost all white jury"
"fellow white dude"


A curious evolution of the mindset of so many Democrats over the last few years has become open hatred of the truth and a belief that all that matters is who can most loudly and often rant the best lies. There was no child involved, the non-whites voted not-guilty, and Zimmerman is EXACTLY as WHITE as President Obama is WHITE.

 

White hispanic. Dude got a German last name. I think you're more upset to read me accusing the judicial system of institutionalized racism.

And get real. The US got a long history of having a culture of institutionalized racism. Bloody hell, that country only outlawed inter racial marriage in 1967! Freaking 22 years after defeating the nazi's, the US was openly racist as hell. That culture just doesn't go away by making a law.

 

I'm not the one who's butthurt here

You blamed a jury for something they had nothing to do with. They didn't do the investigations. They judged based on evidence presented to them by many parties on both sides.

Their race? HAHA.

What an excuse. "It rained today. Damn the white man!".

 

A jury has nothing to do with a case they judge..... right
What an excellent argument.

 

Where did they get every ounce of information? From people like this who lied



Also, he was charged with 1st degree murder lol.

 

Where I got that idea from that a jury has something to do with a trial they are at?
Well gee,... I think it has something to do with an education.

 

yep, he shoudl of been charge with manslaughter imo

 

Yes. If the DA is going to charge someone claiming self defense, it's typically a manslaughter or murder3 charge (if they have murder 3 in whatever district).

 

Also, judges can overrule a jury. Oh but wait, the judge was white, and this is a white people conspiracy, so the judge wasn't going to rule the all white jury out. it's a plot against the Hispanic man.

 

Not so much a conspiracy theory when this is the way it went under arian/jewish apartheid rule, that only ended around 1967!

 

Ah, was wondering when the real "you" would come out.

 

Sounds you found your grounds to ignore my arguments and go make personal attacks.
Brilliant strategy.

 

your arguments were defeated by a jury trial, lying witnesses, and a thug who tried to murder a neighborhood watchman.

 

You never defeated the arguments what I think about the almost all white jury getting a white hispanic out, like it was in the best of Jim Crow days.

 

You have zero evidence. please tell us which jurors have a history of racism and how they "conspired" to let the Hispanic off of Murder because the deceased was black.

Until you cite it, you sound insane.

 

Do you follow him around to report on if he farts? The Zimmerman obsession is interesting.

 

Margot loves to keep Zimmerman in the media so Trayvon's parents can be reminded of the day they lost their son...

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/02/us/02jury.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=0

There is nothing insane about it since it happens. Black are struck from jury 3 times as often as white. It's real obvious how and why this happens. And it's allowed that black people get dismissed because "they look like a drugsdealer" or "you got a goatee" or "you got long hair" or "because how you walk".

 

Where does this prove the jury was racist when they made their decision....