You'll have to do better than that, friend. Both Liberals AND Conservatives wish to see certain speech banned.
You seem very angry. You are also apparently mistaken. A prior poster had falsely stated about another member's post: "It wasn't what you said. He was talking about firing people responsible for a massive screw up, not arresting them because he didn't like them."[emphasis mine] Amazingly AFTER this post the first member confirmed my assertion by posting this: "it's now time for Indictments" [emphasis mine] Your response to this is misplaced and ill-informed.
Your choice, but to what end? Your response is simply splitting hairs on an argument that shows the inanity of the other member's statement that they should start at the top and start arresting people. I'm surprised that you would offer cover to such a ridiculous and anti-American concept. If this was not your intent then it behooves you to clear this up and explain your true position as to this.
Ayuh,... That, is the basis of ALL of yer posts I've seen... Splittin' hairs, 'n twistin' the meaning of what other posters have said... Yer nothin' but a Flamebaiter...
Perhaps you have a better explanation why the ATF purposely let thousands upon thousands of guns to be sold to known Mexican gangs. Can you please explain?
Yeah, Conservatives don't want pornography on public airwaves. Think of the children. Liberals want offensive speech banned. Before you know it, we won't be able to tell a person they are overweight and should make an attempt to better themselves, lest they become offended. Doctors are already scared to tell children are fat in many cases. Nothing like going to the doc, and he says you're a-okay when in reality, he just didn't want to hurt your feelings.
Your post unfairly smears me, but I will not respond in kind. In fact I will even go so far as to thank you for confirming my assertion that you had suggested arresting those at the "top" without any evidence. Thank you. You made my argument that much easier.
I wouldn't dream of making the same mistake as yourself, by hazarding a conclusion based on incomplete or invalid evidence. I'll wait to see the evidence, thank you.
Yeah. "Think of the children". I see that you conveniently neglected to reply to this post. http://www.politicalforum.com/gun-control/226277-heads-have-started-roll-atf-3.html#post4977864
I enjoy correcting some folks when they make a factual error. If you think any kind of formal charges are needed for a President to fire one of his appointees then look at Les Aspin. Clinton fired him with no charges of any kind.
The end result is you're offering cover to a known spammer here. So, since you have weighed in on this issue, please inform us of your position on his suggestion that we arrest those at the top right now and work our way down the ladder. Is this your position too?
Just about the Time Liberals desire Firearms to protect themselves it will be too late for them to procure any.
