Largest Vax Study Ever Confirms “Conspiracy Theorists” Were Right All Along!

Then you need an explanation because you most certainly don't!

The data speaks for itself, but when manipulated, cherry-picked or ignored we get conspiracy theory "results"!

Sorry to hear about this, YET AGAIN! Look up causation and correlation. People got cancer before covid-19 and will get it in decades to come. It may give you comfort to blame it in something but that is all you're doing.

 

Lefty mantra is usually one death is too many... So, for you, given this report, how many thousands of folks dying from the jab is too many for you?

 

You don't know that anymore than I know that it did.
.
There is more evidence that it may have been involved then that it wasn't.

She was completely fine before the vaccine. She was fine on the first shot but for the second shot her arm immediately swelled up like a baseball and she got a sore throat the very same day and then lumps started developing in her neck that turned to cancer which has now turned to several other forms.

At the very least you have to admit that's awful damn suspicious.

 

Precisely my point.

That isn't how cancer works. She could have already had it and the vaccine triggered an immune response because of it.

 

how many saved by the vax also figures into the risk\reward ratio, then you decide for yourself - just like with a gun, a car... etc...

 

Possibly, but she would have still been better off without it, in that case.

I just know she was fine before the jab and had an immediate and obvious bodily reaction to it.

Get all the jabs you want and hopefully nothing similar happens to your body.

I'll take a hard pass on it.

 

An immediate bodily reaction could have been triggered by the cancer. People in vulnerable states also experience something similar. As has been shown, the reaction from a vaccine is incomparable to that of the virus itself.

 

Now theres a load of bullshit! The charts and analysts (the honest ones) proved otherwise.
the CDC was red handed busted for falsifying data.

 

Speculation.

 

Uh no, anti-vaxxers are still firmly in tinfoil hat land. Your post reflects a poor understanding of statistics.

Here's a math lesson for you. What is 6.91 multiplied by zero. Yes, it's zero. Okay. What is 0.000000001 times 6.91? Yes 0.00000000691. Now use this newfound insight to understand why these numbers don't mean what you think they mean.

What numbers do we need to determine if these risks are unacceptable? Number needed to treat. Number needed to harm. Statistical analysis by somebody who actually understands statistics. When we think about number to treat we have to think of the alternative. The alternative was to get the actual covid disease earlier, with an unprepared immune system, and at a time when covid was more virulent. The vaccines were very helpful for mitigating the damages of covid.

 

Uhuh. Did the words "could have" not indicate clearly that that was what I was doing?

 

It's clear that you don't want to believe the two events might be connected.

What is 100% factually known as that she was fine until she took that damn vaccine

 

Yep. That's clear.

Look up causation and correlation. MAYBE start a thread huh instead of saying this stuff yet again? I just did a check on your history and it appears you have dumped this SPECULATION on over a dozen threads!

BTW: Early 60s is hardly a surprise for cancer.

 

Just keep the faith and remember to roll up your sleeve any time they need new test subjects.

And her cancer immediately following vax is verified fact.

 

Fear mongering crap.

You said. About 20 times or more. Off topic spamming.

 

DUPLICATE

 

Hmm... so you don't ascribe to the one death is too many anymore? I assume that your new risk benefit analysis is for everything then, right? And to be fair, we can't actually define how many folks were "saved". What we can describe is how many who got the jab that still also got the COVID and then how many of those also died, either from COVID or other contributing factors, ie the hypertensive cardiopathies that the shot produced.

 

Of course YOU would think so. You and the faithful won't hear a damn thing about adverse effects.

 

When someone makes a fear mongering comment, I'll call it out.

False. We are all aware of them, but not to the erroneous extent in which they are conflated - largely through ignorance, sometimes deliberately.

 

Thankfully this forum is full of medical experts on the topic. We'd all be so lost without you.

 

You're not a "we" and you already seem quite lost.

 

never have.... I drive a car... don't you?

 

I'm not interested in sitting here trading Petty insults with you so if you don't have anything useful to add.... Feel free not to reply

 

Like when the government coerced everyone to mindlessly get the jab because we are all gonna die if we dont with exaggerated claims, did you call that out?

 

Its not off topic and its not spamming since I have not heard that before, trying to shut down more inconvenient facts? Its my thread and its ON TOPIC.