Looks like another Stormfront recruiting drive around here recently.

Note: I had spent another 20+ minutes tacking on some more to this post including a more extensive list of relevant threads. Due to exceeding the time limit for edits, my revision didn't make it... I may get around to doing it again but for now I have a few things to do.

 

Here, let me help you.

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...ideo-racism-test-white-people-fail-again.html

http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...their-racist-greatness-killing-black-man.html

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...-dont-know-anything-about-power-movement.html

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...68-cops-shoot-unarmed-black-man-81-times.html

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...s-suck-pushing-their-agenda-black-people.html

But since this isn't sturmfront but black power, all is well.
BTW, there are more where this came from. Let me know if you need more help.
EO, that's all.

 

Big problem with the "official" numbers. Many of us believe, to a fault, that it almost takes an act of Congress for a black to be charged with a "hate crime" against a white. What you also see in FBI statistics is a huge flip in teh percentages of crimes by blacks against whites, and then whites agianst blacks, and then the ratio that get the "hate crime" designation. To where it defies logic.

Hate to say it, but many of us are starting to believe our lying eyes. Seems they've been telling the truth for a lot longer than we gave them credit for.

 

Which is why liberalism in the US is failing. Why such as the Congressional Black Caucus is being seen as nothing but institutional racism. Why affirmative action is being pushed back against in so many venues. Why such as Bill Cosby and Mayor Nutter of Philadelphia are finally saying "the problem is us".

Love that evolution.

 

I was at that tea party. It was very well behaved. I was not on the steps but i know that there was no spitting, no name calling. Tea partiers do not do that. There was no earthly reason for those democrats to go walking thru that crowd and up those steps. The ONLY reason that they would choose to do so would be so try to gin up some violence and barring that, they will make up confrontations. Which they did. I am VERY disappointed in those black congressmen involved. I see that they have left any integrity that they may have possessed and have decided to go the way of other popular race baiters.

 

Yes, I saw all that.

 

no you didn't.

 

Nothing is made up. The evidence is readily available and some examples have been provided on this thread. Rather than try to remove the cancer, the Tea Party line is that this is rare, photoshopped or Liberal infiltraitors, but with no evidence of any of that. Just an excuse to ignore it and let it fester.

 

Actually, I did.

You didn't.

 

Only imbeciles and commie-lib traitors will believe you.

 

Perhaps not as well as you know how to patronise. Are questions not worthy of an answer because you don't feel them appropriate?

What is the Tea Party's official policy regarding race issues? Or even, what is your official policy regarding race issues?

 

And those that google and let the evidence lead where it may.

 

Any race issue will do. Even their general approach to race issues. Is it inclusive? Is it anti-inclusive?

It is fairly important as an issue, to people worldwide who have seen the results of right wing fanaticism in Norway.

 

Viv. The "Tea Party" is not a chartered political party. It has no leader. It has no "official" position. If you wanted to see a document it adheres to, check the US Constitution, and then all laws consistent with such.

With regard to immigration, I think it very safe to say that they are for the securing of the border, and enforcement of immigration law, as these are concepts consistent with our Constitution. That such has become a radical concept is what they endeavor to change. The friction lies where American liberalism has become inconsistent with our Constitution.

 

Inclusive, of course. The Republicans and the Tea Party are supportive of opportunity for all. And we believe that having a strong economy and a good education provides the opportunity.

So, there's no problem with smearing ALL whites over the action of one white man.....BUT a big no-no to even discuss if it's the other way around? I say, let it all be discussed. All of this trying to smear an entire race over the actions of one...a few, or even more than a few.....is being disengenuous. And that works both ways. There are good and bad people within every race.

 

I'd say race is essentially a non-issue as far as the Tea Party is concerned, and there are several prominent black Tea Party supporters. By contrast, race-baiting is a seemingly indispensable component of the Democrat arsenal, and has been for decades, though they have been somewhat successful at projecting their own sins onto conservatives.

 

Apologies, didn't mean to patronize, just honestly assumed that, since the Tea party has been around and discussed for a few years now, folks were more informed.

http://www.teaparty.org/about.php

These were of most concern to you, if I understood correctly.

Personally, I am more into this...
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/about.php#mission

 

By the same principle, you are fully informed that the Conservative Party in Scotland is so unpopular the candidate for its leadership has announced should his Party elect him, he will disband the Party. Sorry? You don't know anything at all about Scottish politics? Then why do you expect non US people to be fully informed about internal US pol?

US is just a country somewhere else in the world. Its politics are of passing interest from time to time, at the moment as they have affected the world economy drastically.

Thank you, I will read it if no one else posts an unbiased response to the question (@ Yguy...unbiased!).

Why?

 

Since you are understandably ignorant about US politics, how will you know when you get an unbiased response?

 

Many international posters seem to be expert on US doings, are here to post, criticize, make their opinions known, as if they have no problem informing themselves on issues somewhere in these parts of the world. So I assumed....
On the other hand, I do not involve myself in Scottish politics, nor am I posting on a Scottish forum.

Not sure what you mean by unbiased response. You wanted a link, you got it.

Back to racism and tea parties. If I understand the phrase "All red blooded U.S. citizens are welcome" correctly, it doesn't exclude any race or color of skin. That was one of the issues at hand.

If you wish to argue, find someone else.

 

Is it completely non affiliated to any existing Party?

I have been told many times neither of your major political parties adheres to the US Constitution, they are two sides of the same coin, with very little difference between them.

So it is affiliated with Republicanism. What does it support regarding the less advantaged in your society?

People should ignore the risk then, as people did with Nazis. All it takes for evil to succeed... ring any bells? Prevention is better. Breivik is an extremist who tried to find support in Conservative circles. As he failed to consolidate that, it may be there is no support or it may be the people he contacted were not willing to convert the beliefs they share to the level of action. They are no less dangerous for that, as one incident can trigger such people.

I did not smear all whites, only right wingers. (oh for goodness sake). Racism by its nature regularly smears all non whites over the action of none, as it is often based on prejudiced ignorance and fear, not in fact.

 

Nor are you posting on a US forum, btw.

That was addressed to yguy.

Debate and argue are different. Sometimes people are ok with aggressive debate until they are on the receiving end of it. But as you responded to my posts, perhaps you can find someone else if you are not enjoying like being met with like.

 

Lots of truth in that. Hey, who knew, even from across the pond.

Seriously, the tea parties seem to have been hijacked but one party, or I should say the avoidance by our liberal/Dem citizens have enabled such a take over.
Most, on both sides of the aisle seem to give lip service to the Constitution, when its convenient, when its in accordance with one's beliefs.
Can't speak for Reps when it comes to the disadvantage, but personally, I believe that, enabling someone to better him/herself, instead of catering to their needs, should take priority.
The elderly, the infirm, the disabled, must always be taken care of.

 

Whaaaaaaa, she's mean...lmclto.
BTW, I doubt I have ever posted on international sub fora, but rather stick with stuff concerning US politics and such.

 

While many of those threads you mentioned were clearly demeaning to people of other races, and many verged on the edge of inciting anger, some of those threads nevertheless brought up valid points.

There are indeed Chicano/Latino racial separatist groups that seek a racial struggle with the white peoples to "reclaim" their "lost territories". But certain posters seem to be trying to use this fact against all Chicanos, to incite conflict on this forum. The same thing can be said with how white slaves were treated. It is indeed a worthy issue to discuss, but should not have any direct relation to current politics.

I very much resent that you singled out my thread in your list:
http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...5390-why-you-offended-racial-separatists.html

That thread is not an "infestation" or "garbage". I was trying to be as respectful as possible to start a discussion about my political views. From the map I posted in the thread, it is clear that different races tend to prefer living separately apart. It is not necessarily "racist" to suggest that the government help people in their desire to live amongst their own kind.