Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years????

Meteorological Office (Met Office) at the Hadley centre in the UK has just released new figures that show no warming in the last 15 years.

If anything they are predicting cooling.

This just goes to show that Anthropogenic Global Warming just like its predecessor Global Cooling and the coming of a new ice age is a LIE which makes the Carbon Tax a scam.

Fossil fuel energy is the cheapest form of energy available to all peoples of the Earth, yet for some reason or another this privelage will be taken from us all whether you are in the west or third world countries.

Ask anyone in a third world country what they most desire and they will tell you its energy at their finger tips, electricity and the ability to shower or prepare hot food or keep warm or cool from the cold and heat respectively.

What does this then say about the only source which has been telling us global warming is upon us, that source being the computer models of the IPCC and others.

Its fake people wake up and smell the air for fark sake, its just another privelage the elite want the masses to go without.

If you take away these computer models what evidence are the global warming fanatics left with? that Co2 causes serious global warming or a runaway green house effect.

The only thing they are left with is their dicks in their hands, because their is no empirical evidence to suggest otherwise.

Remember what their models where predicting and saying, well its all bullsh!t.

Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant, its in our beer and soft drinks, we breath the stuff out, plants use it to grow bigger and quicker.

Do pollutants have this type of effect?

Anthropogenic Global Warming is a LIE !

The Carbon Tax is a SCAM !

Gillard should SCRAP this farking Carbon Tax right now like tomorrow imo.

 

Such an apposite name. Rose is a hack and he sucked the gullible in with his lies. The Met office said no such thing, the title is a false assertion.

 

Well then i guess the daily mail will have a court case on its hands for publishing bullsh!t.

Its right there on their web page, just follow the link at the bottom to read the rest.

 

Today the Mail on Sunday published a story written by David Rose entitled “Forget global warming – it’s Cycle 25 we need to worry about”.

This article includes numerous errors in the reporting of published peer reviewed science undertaken by the Met Office Hadley Centre and for Mr. Rose to suggest that the latest global temperatures available show no warming in the last 15 years is entirely misleading.

Despite the Met Office having spoken to David Rose ahead of the publication of the story, he has chosen to not fully include the answers we gave him to questions around decadal projections produced by the Met Office or his belief that we have seen no warming since 1997.

http://metofficenews.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/met-office-in-the-media-29-january-2012/

Next thread ....

 

Geez Dom

I thought you had more of a inquisitive brow than that?!

As long as your're doing you're duty and paying the carbon tax levy you have done your bit to save the world mate no need to worry about anything else.

I wonder how you feel about the cemetary carbon tax burial fee, not that i expect you to pass on any time soon.

But i will be adding it to my list of goods and services that are affected by this toxic tax.

Just before i go you should read some of the comments at the bottom of that page you posted, there's one below.

Many brits like myself cant justify the carbon tax by sitting on your page, they also want the full book.

At least your content where as i cant say the same.

Your science is in.

 

And your point is, look, I debunked your thread, the guy was shown to be a charlatan, your thread an outright lie.

Thank you for the definition of scientific theory, but as I have degrees in science I am well aware of the definition.

 

Why is it still up on the internet?

Why hasn't the met office fileda law suit against him and the mail if its so wrong?

Thats ok dude just pay the levy leave the rest up to people like me.

 

Um why are there lies on the internet, my goodness dumb, what are you implying, every one knows that everything on the internet is gospel. Maybe because they published a retraction and were satisfied that the only people that would believe him anyway were the small number of feeble minded and gullible people that will believe anything put up by the money men.

 

What amazes me about you blokes, is you make a claim, it gets shot down in flames, you retaliate against us personally, then skulk off to troll the net for other unsubstantiated claims by unscrupulous people on the payroll of big corporations or radical political movements.

Just give up and see the truth. The truth is out there....

 

Come out of the darkness into the light, for the darkness doesn't exist. It was created in the minds of Abbott and others to try and bolster a weak and dying position. Oh and there will be no CTS on the light when you come, it's called sunlight. Shinning in a bright clear pollution free sky thanks to positive action on climate change.

 

Fair enough Dom

I know that by paying your carbon tax levvy you think in some way you have contributed to saving the planet from manmade pollution.

Good luck with it champ.

 

hahahahahaahahahahah!!!! Poor old dumb.....give him a break DV, he's doing his best here.....lol!!

 

If this article was as false as the met office makes it out to be why haven't they filed a law suit against the daily mail?

You see there is a smidgeon of truth in there, they are just trying to say that you have to take into consideration all their projections, not just a snippet.

Still the earth has cooled and will continue to do so.

Thats why the met office will not sue or go to court over this issue.

So vig and dom you have debunked nothing.

 

I don't think you should have made this claim. We are all aware that climate is changing, should it warm in the near future, then you will be open for attack.

The Met may not agree with the article but they also can not disprove the premise of the article any more than the can prove their own.

It is a very debatable point.

 

True gary i agree.

But when you have scientists that aren't in the global warming religion and payroll saying that the Earths temperature has decreased and will continue to do so since our sun is headed fro some slumber.

And then you have the scientists in the global warming religion telling us the Earth has warmed and will continue to do so.

WHO the heck do you believe???????????????????????????????

Well i guess you know where i stand.

 

Yes, I know what you mean.

 

Shades of the Black Knight from Holy Grail! He killed your argument. Lie down.

 

Well Colonel you're full of punch lines aren't you.

Sorry to inform you but the met office slipped up they actually forgot and published statistics from weather baloons and thermometers which show no global warming for the past 15 years.

And lets not forget the NASA satalites.

OOOPPPPSSS hey what we meant to say is that the parametric computer projections indicate global warming for the last 15 years and they should be read inconjunction with..................................................

YEAH YEAH kiss my arse.

 

More evidence the temperature has cooled in the last 15 years.

http://mclean.ch/climate/Tropos_temps.htm

Graph from the University of Alabama (Huntsville)

 

Because they have learnt that all that does is have the media scream "free speech" and accuse scientists of trying to "silence" them while adding in large helpings of conspiracy and dark innuendos about how they have been "prevented" from "uncovering the truth" whilst selling tons of copy to the gullible

See what I mean - even though it has been refuted, and by more than the Met office, and in fact it has been refuted by people on this board using a basic program and the raw data - denialists will still believe what they want to believe - i.e there is no global warming

 

(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((sigh))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Well, if people cannot tell the difference between bad journalism and good science I suppose they cannot be expected to know the difference between some anonymous poster making stuff up and a professionally compiled and validated report

D&D - those graphs are NOT from the University of Alabama but are BASED on the data from there - read the fine print

 

BB, since when has the validity of the data etc been important, it
shows what they want us to believe, that's the main thing.

 

Yes, it is called "confirmation bias" where people people actively seek out information which bolsters the view they already hold - what really really rips me though is they seem to grab the first website that floats across the general internet effluent. They never ask themselves how come Joe Blogs, local plumber and bar fly is so much more of an expert than the head of CSIRO climate studies - they just know that Joe agrees with them

 

And are you claiming you have never been guilty of doing that yourself BB?

 

The graph is consistent with the warming & cooling cycles. World temperatures should cool on average until 2028 & then warm a bit higher on average than the last warming cycle. The warming & cooling cycles leading to increased temperature should continue for another 100 to 200 years before dropping off into a mini ice age & the whole thing starts over again.