Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years????

You mean we have to rip their lands from under their feet like a table clothwith china on it?

Or do you mean we have to kick them of their farmlands so the air above can be traded as carbon credits?

In the mean time they wil be forced to clear more land for new farms!

Or will this be outlawed as well?

So what happens to these people will we let them starve?

Just exactly what are you proposing when you say we have to pay them more?

Pay them more to do what?

 

Which makes it AT BEST a SECONDARY source. Wiki On citing Wiki for Academia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_Wikipedia

If "Doug Cotton" has the academic degrees he is claiming he should have known that.

 

So, your very BEST citation is to an anonymous poster on this forum!

Well if that is the standard how about
http://www.politicalforum.com/austr...how-no-warming-15-years-6.html#post1061473179

Do you want to prove that that is not "playing with the truth" in an attempt (lame one) to "disprove" climate change

 

If anyone is seriously interested then i suggest you look up the holocene period and its temperatures.

And the below is from an alamists webpage.

 

What about it?

They told the truth and got their sorry arses in to trouble, so they had to discredit the journalist.

Why haven't they taken him to court?

Why is this article still available on the internet.

Finally a journalist that did his job as he's suppose to.

 

Oh! Dear! If you post to a link it is a good idea to READ IT FIRST!!

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/holocene.html

And how does that correlate with your assertion that

http://www.politicalforum.com/austr...how-no-warming-15-years-6.html#post1061473179

Ps you forgot to reference that graph!!

 

David Rose playing with the truth again - but even HE would not come out with such a blatant misrepresentation of the facts as

http://www.politicalforum.com/austr...how-no-warming-15-years-6.html#post1061473179

Which since you have failed to prove must mean that the paper you were "critiquing" must have actually been correct

 

You love playing with words dont you?

Where did i say that this graph correlates to the OP?



The graph above is from wikipedia and shows temperatures for the last 12000 years

Remember

But to point it out even further lets get some bigger scaled graphs.

Now about the OP what exactly did the met office say about the article in the mail written by David Rose

So what does the Met Office mean when its says projections?

That wouldn't be computer projections would it?

Projections are probabilistic in nature? Abit like predicting the weather wouldn't you say!

2000 - 2009 the warmest decade on record and 2010 the warmest year.

I thought 1998 was the warmest year ever, maybe you could explain that one to me.

And the IPCC is predicting a rise of 2.5 degrees celcius in about 90 years time.

Now we know that most scientists alarmists and Skeptics a like agree that a doubling of CO2 in our atmosphere will most probably rise the global mean average temperature by 1 degree celcius.

So maybe you can explain this one to me as well how are we going to increase the temperature by 2.5 degrees celcius in 90 years in accordance with IPCC computer projections.

If 390ppm x 2 = 780ppm ( 1 degree celcius) will our CO2 levels increase to about 1365ppm in 90 years time?

If you can explain it to me and all the lurkers that might happen to drop in to see whats been happening i would apprecaite it.

Cause apart from rubbishing our references and bloggers/sources you really haven't said zip in the way of opinion or personal understanding about anything.

I look forward to discussing your answers.

 

BTW the information came from here.

 

No I am or try to be, very precise about what I say

And I did not say it did - go back and read my post

No, the URL does NOT point to Wiki but to http://i48.tinypic.com/scvtro.png - and when I googled the image itself I got some Japanese website - that was untranslated!!

Not going to reply to anything until you explain this

http://www.politicalforum.com/austr...how-no-warming-15-years-6.html#post1061473179

 

Yes you're playing with words because you cannot do anything else.

I have posted so many things, asked you so many questions that you have left unasnwered.

And this is all you can reply to, this is very poor form indeed, i thought you where smarter than this.

Its becoming a joke and i can't take your shenanigans seriously any more.

Want to be taken seriously start debating what you believe in cause your debunking stinks and its getting very boring.

OOHH yeah and that graph came from here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_climatic_optimum

Yeah arrrmmm you should follow your advice and read my previous post.

otherwise me thinks your trolling, a bit bored in the outback are we?



.