Obama, Dems Now "Laying Low" As Facts About Saint Trayvon Keep Emerging

You don't think the facts warrant investigation?

After all, it was just a black kid that was unnecessarily killed, right?

 

Truly!

After all, what's the fun and manliness in carrying a gun if you can't blow away someone you don't like now and then?

 

So, in Right Wing Whacky World, the White House is supposed to issue daily updates in its original statement on a murder in Florida?

Obama made a statement. He MAY make another one when the grand jury and/or the FBI issues their decision.

 

Founder....

 

I never said they don't warrant an investigation, only that anyone here cannot deduce what really went on based on the evidence shown.

 

Nothing like a lack of leadership when there are factions that are inflaming the situation with race baiting.

 

So when I wrote:

There is absolutely a case and justification for questioning why the (*)(*)(*)(*) this happened.

Why did you write: "According to you"?

 

No, there was no justification for it then due to evidence. Now that it has been politicized, there will be an investigation.

 

You agree that an investigation is warranted but there was no justification for an investigation due to the evidence.

Maybe your position makes sense to others.

 

Which is ONLY happening because the public, the politicians, and the president spoke out against an incomplete whitewash "investigation".

Now there is not much to say until the REAL investigations are complete.

That is why RESPONSIBLE politicians and the president are not saying anything.

 

Exactamundo. It's only worthy of note if a white man can be blamed for a black man's death.

 

Bullcrap. The President flapped his yar AFTER the Leftninny Media had created Saint Trayvon the Pure, in their OWN IMAGINATIONS, as we now know.

 

Whitewash is just your opinion. You know what they say about opinions.

 

Aside from my wifes steamed salmon and rice, nothing is 100% right. Apparently, according to all the facts, the Prosecutor and Police decided that there wasn't sufficient cause to charge Zimmerman. That's all we know. If it goes to trial, the lawyers will present their cases, and the jury will wrestle a verdict. And that will be that. In the mean time, young black men will be murdering young black men faster than Shaquille O'Neil can go thru a bag of cheeto's.

 

But that's "OK".

It's only a "problem" is it's a white man doing the killing,and an opportunity for $harpton to $tart a "fund" to "help the family"....

 

Thanks, will do LC.

 

So asking for an opinion based on the facts and the facts only ignoring race and other outside factors and you cannot give your opinion based on facts and you can't ignore race and other outside irrelevant factors?

Gotcha.

 

Since you are replying to someone who is replying to me please find in my short post history where I blamed the white man for any of this and also find where I didn't specifically state that in my opinion race itself was not a factor and a hate crime charge would be ridiculous given the facts?

Do not address me as if I have said things I have not, whether directly or not...if you wish to comment on something I said, even through proxy, make sure it is something I said.

 

You dismember whole thought like a serial killer his victim. I question your heart. Nothing that you or anyone on the left has said or accused thus far has held up to scrutiny. But you are not swayed. Dissatisfaction then awaits you.

 

Sharpton and Jackson are vying to see who gets their picture first above Jesus and King on the black living room wall.

 

I don't understand what you mean. If it weren't for all the outside factors influencing the matter, there wouldn't be an issue. I mean, why don't you tell the race baiters to go home, and leave the involved parties in Sanford and Miami to heal.

 

OMG, the Libs heads mus be exploding. Good laugh, Don.

 

Because last I checked Sharpton, NBP, Jesse Jackson, Monique from da block, hoodie wearers, etc...are not here...so instead I opted to speak to you and people who think like you.

I am not focusing on race...I do not think Zimmerman was influenced by race...I do not think he went out to go kill ANYONE. I think he acted irresponsibly and as a result a young man, barely 17, lay dead.

I think he should be charged with involuntary manslaughter at the very least and I do not think any "hate crime" charge should be levied against him nor do I think murder should as well as murder implies specific intent as IIRC.

I see a young man walking home...a young man noticing he's being followed, a young man scared, a young man hiding, a young man found, a young man questioning his follower, a scuffle occurring, a young man fighting for his life...a young man dying.

Up until George Zimmerman approached Trayvon NOTHING fatal could've happened. The fact that the altercation took place directly on the path Trayvon was taking to go home is evidence of this.

We know GZ was following Trayvon under the false notion that he was responsible for a string of break ins...we know that at some point TM and GZ were in a fight (and contrary to popular belief no one knows who started the fight)

We know TM ended up dead...while on the very path that would lead him to where he was staying.

How those facts can lead anyone to think TM somehow deserved to die is beyond me.

It wouldn't matter if GZ was a scout master and TM was a gang member...or vice versa...

It wouldn't matter if GZ was Black and TM was white...

A young man died for doing NOTHING wrong that night...and a man who killed him walked away scott free...no investigation...corrective police...etc. etc.

Something smells funny, and thankfully there is an investigation now...unfortunately the media had to report it stupidly and the race baiters had to get their hands on this case...a case where even TM parents only wanted a thorough investigation....as did the man who brought all of this to light.

The current shouting match between parties is unnecessary and pretty sad...

so take politics out of it...take race out of it...and look at it based on evidence...what do you have?

That's what I'm asking.

Why are you and the others unable to give your opinion based solely on the facts? I'd hate for you to be on a jury.

 

You assume he was doing nothing wrong. All of these assumptions don't get to the fact of the matter, none of us was there.

 

Well put and reasonable. Let me give that some thought. And thanks for the response.