PANIC AT LONDON BRIDGE London Bridge incident: Terror attack fears as van ploughs into up to 20

Got a better way then? Come on, let's all hear it . . . we're waiting . . .

 

Let’s not confound Muslims and people that have psychiatric (or at least serious psychological) disorders. There always been mass murderers… And, in the US, you got a big bunch of them.

• Adam Lanza
• Seung-Hui Cho
• Marshall Applewhite
• …

Were they Muslims ? No.

Today, these kind of guy says to himself : « Oh, I will say that I kill in the name of God ! » At least he feels good.

And the most dangerous psychopath is the one that can use the nuclear weapons…

Regards.

 

London Bridge

 

Labour aren't Liberal.
Labour are for the workers.
Against the bourgeoisie.

Liberals in the UK power shared with a Conservative after the re branded neo Socialists quit leaving for a hung Parliament where a Liberal was deputy Prime Minister... And the last time there was a Liberal in charge in the UK was, over 100 years ago.
Labour today are.... The Workers Party.
The Nanny State Party.
For the many, not the few.

Liberals are almost extinct in my country.
I guess when they had power over 100 years ago, they really ****ed up bad, because today they're desperate.
It's such a shame that Liberal Democrats, the real Hillary Clintons and Obamas, are behind Labour.
Why cant our two party system between Liberalism and Conservatism?
Why the Socialists?

Also... I'm British, let me educated any guests/visitors/who may not know the Labour Party..

The Labour Party were in charge in the 1970s.
They wanted to keep the coal and gave the world the British answer to the Trabant.
Which lead to 10 years of Britain's first woman Prime Minister.
Who you'know..
Gave the Socialists (because there are many here) the right to buy their own social housing from the council in a scheme called 'right to buy'..
She kicked butt too.
and she lived in times of terror too with the IRA.
Then Labour was reborn after Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Prime Minister John Major (both conservative) with the landslide win from the young charismatic Prime Minster Tony Blair who re branded Socialism in such way he received praise from the Iron Lady herself, Margaret Thatcher over his 'New Labour' and re branding of that Socialist party.
We had 10 years of Tony Blair's New Labour which really was criticised by members of that political party Jeremy Corbyn and Ken Livingstone. Ken Livingstone left Labour because of New Labour and ran as an Independent and become London's first mayor.
I'm from London and am stuck in London, but, as far as terraced ant farms go under the sky, London is a pretty interesting one, so, whatever, YAY! London..
Mayor Ken Livingstone was, what I'm guessing Prime Minister Jeremy Corbyn'll be like if he ever wins..
Jeremy Corbyn... Once talked about having Tony Blair arrested.
So, in the 1990s - 2000s when Prime Minister Tony Blair had his 10 years and Cheri Blair (his wife) said to camera as she was leaving Number 10 Downing Street for the last time something like 'screw you!' to the press (or public).
Then we had a half blind Scot who Tony Blair left in charge and nobody voted for (At least John Major had an election)..
To be fair though, he had twice as much eye sight as David Blunket in that Labour Party.
Then he quit when NO ONE got enough votes to win.
So we had Prime Minister David Cameron and a Liberal Democrat.

So... The last time Jeremy Corbyn's political were in Number 10 Downing Street was back in the 1970s, when they gave the world a reason to moan about British cars. British Leyland.
We can not trust these people with Brexit.
If Ken Livingstone could leave Tony Blair and become Mayor of London (I think twice) and make some bus stops sport a poster with little Venezuelan flag saying 'the oil in your busses is Venezuelan thanks to Mayor Ken Livingstone' (I'm paraphrasing), and that came from TFL (Transport for London) which the mayor runs.


If Jeremy Corbyn wins, it'll be a Socialist.

Labour

If you want to see the last Liberal

 

The Muslim conquest of Iberia began in 711. Maybe your claim is true, I could care less, even if it is, 13 centuries is a long time to hold a grudge.

 

Yes, using the rule of law and our intelligence and security services to find the dangerous Islamic minority not persecuting a whole faith like we are Nazi Germany. We have hate crime laws against preaching violence and should use them to prosecute offenders. Social media companies should have more pressure put on them to shut down sites which advocate violence against the West. Eroding our human rights and interning without trial is not the way forward in a modern society.
What is your solution? My guess is some sort of ''final solution''.

 

How they must laugh when they read snivelling, goody-two-shoes leftie posts like that. It make them realise that it's gonna be a walk in the park for them, and that global jihad is in the bag already.

 

Neatly done.

 

I was using the American meaning of Liberal which seems to mean anyone not on the right.
I am British and have lived here for most of my 52 years, I don't need a lecture on British politics thanks.

 

Not a leftie.
So go on, tell us what your solution would be.
Also snivelling in fear from a few random attacks by lunatic extremists who you seem to think are going to somehow overthrow Western culture is your position not mine. I have more faith that Britain can weather this storm than you appear to have. Grow some balls you coward.

 

Nice vid of the Brit police sending the 3 mad dogs to hell within 5 seconds of arriving on the scene..-
"Ungodly..They are like brute beasts, creatures of instinct, born only to be caught and destroyed.." (Bible:2 Peter 2:12)

 

Well I'd begin by denying them human rights, and access to the rule of law. They're the enemy, and furthermore they don't wear uniforms; the usual method of dealing with fifth-columnists and spies in war is to shoot them dead, not provide them with a brief sojourn in a comfortable western prison thence to allow them out into the communities in order to continue where they left off with the atrocities. That's the kind of stupidity they can't believe, and why they laugh at us.

 

Yes, and incidentally the majority of the Brit people have been voting for the pro-immigration parties for many years, which statistically means the majority of the English who've been killed in the assorted attacks voted for those parties, karma.
PS- I've just voted for the anti-immigration party UKIP, so my conscience will be quite clear when future attacks happen..

 

Yes. Left/Right differs here. The Left likes a society run by government, the right likes self-rule with regulation only where necessary, and those regulators do so as the servants of the people.

 

yeah, it was due to religious bigotry.

it says so in all the expulsion orders.

they didn't like the idea of Christians converting to Judaism, they accused Jews of the Black Plague, and of putting Christian baby blood in their matzos.

 

do you think Jewish intelligence and upward mobility in their host nations wasn't a source of jealousy and animosity ?

 

every single Expulsion Order made by a European Kingdom, mentioned religious motivations.

that's it.

but i guess you think they were liars

 

why would Christians have that level of hatred for faith alone ?

 

don't be naive.

until say 1900, the Christians of Europe were NOTORIOUSLY hateful towards Jews.

Jews only got civil rights in many European states in the late 19th century, and in some places not even then.

Spanish and Portugees expulsion orders are CLEAR: the Jews were kicked out due to their religion. But some could stay if they became Christian, signaling that this was a PURELY religious conflict.

 

Were Jews doing well for themselves in Spain and Portugal during this time ?

 

dude, Wikipedia.

Use it.

 

so you're saying it was good old fashioned hatred of the Jewish faith/culture ? it says the Jews of Spain were pretty well assimilated, but they pushed these anti-Jews programs anyway.

i don't get it - if these Jews were basically Spaniards living the Jewish faith, why the need to push them out ? Hell, I didn't know even England had anti-Jewish acts.

this was well before any 'monopolization' that most Jews get accused of - interesting, i gotta admit.

 

sorry bro, but naivety doesn't cut it.

The Spanish Expulsion order is CLEAR:

they were mad that Christians were converting to Judaism. And that's why they kicked out the Jews.

The Portugees expulsion order said the same thing, though they said if the Jews converted to Catholicism, they could stay.

NO mention of economic competition or crimes.


Oh, but the Expulsion Orders from Germany, France, Lithuania accused the Jews of abusing the sacramental bread. Again, another silly religious conflict.

 

I do know of the Pale of Settlement that Russians forced Jews to live in for centuries. Then why is this idea of Jewish control so prevalent in Europe and the US ? I refuse to deny the fact Jews do have a very strong influence in culture and media, at least here in the US.

 

you want me to explain irrational and illogical bigotry to you???

you actually think bigotry needs to have a rational and logical basis???

wow, just wow.