Pelosi, Who Pushed Through 'Non-Gendered Language' Calls Herself Wife, Mother, Grandmother, Daughter

Not sure why it was even necessary to include that. Do you really believe that ANYONE has been prevented from getting married because they are non-binary?

Who the hell would ask, "do you identify as male or female?"

 

Why does "obergefell v. hodges gender" return zero relevant results on Google?

 

Correct.

"LIES?" No, I just got it wrong. There's a difference.

You're obviously unaware of the various speech codes that the left has implemented in the US!

 

There is no such thing as white nationalists anymore. Less than 1% of America probably has those views. Step out of your liberal bubble please.....

As for Nancy well here is this:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_storming_of_the_United_States_Capitol#Deaths_and_injuries

Maybe layoff the kkkanon nonsense websites.

Go source it was antifa.

The thing is, why weren't more white fascists shot by 7 bullets like the predominantly white police force does to black people all the time?
It was like shooting fish in a barrel, and all them thugs with guns were able to do is shoot ones, while their buddies were knocked in the hospital by the dozen an hour.
It shows how utterly racist and incompetent them cops are. It's needs a massive overhaul.

 

Nothing compares to fascists attacking the US democracy at it's core. And here you are downplaying it,... and so siding with it between the lines.

 

Only one side was out there to kill the other side.
And as always,... that was the right wing who were the most violent by far.

Right wing extremists have been the most violent people by far for decades.
You value human live to something like a broken window and stolen tv, in order to sweet talk right wing extremists.
Good job on showing your true colors.

 

Because it's not specifically MY opinion.

Some shops does not equal an entire city, but that's what you claimed.

The far left has a point that the police force got a massive problem with institutionalized racism.
It was proven on the 6th, showing the the predominantly white police force had the upmost restrained when them fascists ATTACKED cops.
While those same cops have no problem just shooting black people when they don't cooperate. Or even kill them when they are lying faced down in the handcuffs.

While the far right has no point. The elections weren't stolen. Etc.
It's just far right being far more violent, and being the biggest threat to the US as always.

It's not "defund" it's... "defund the police". It's a phrase with context.
I sourced the context: Activists that support the defunding of police departments often argue that investing in community programs could provide a better crime deterrent for communities; funds would go toward addressing social issues, like poverty, homelessness, and mental disorders.

Good to see you're even able to rape such a phrase out of context and how honest you're are in attempting to make a point.

[/QUOTE]
There was no de-escalation done by the cops either.
The politicians had to flee for their lives.

What remains is that cops show complete restraint when they get attacked by white people, while they show no restraint when black people ignore them.
Institutionalized racism was seen clearly by the entire world to see.

 

who else do you think I mean?

nonsense

That's not me quoting Donald. That's me arguing Donald, and you as well,... equate breaking windows and stealing tv's is just as violent as killing people with the "violence by both sides". You either make that equation, or drop that the line of there was violence on both sides,... meaning it was all rather equal. And he ment that. Right wingers got that message and were rather happy about it. Seems you're unable to get it. What gives?

 

I'm not here to take your hand and teach you all about the casual modern norms and values of gendered language.
If you want to stick to Christian extremist conservatism, than it's fine.

 

The quanon shaman isn't antifa. He got arrested over it, with his fellow fascists friends.
You're talking quanon fake news to pin this on antifa.
And it's so 2020 to stick to that stop the steal, when nothing was stolen.
The virus is real. Masks also do help. The alternative reality is gone.

 

Legal marriage is whatever the legal system in question says it is and for what purpose it is. There is nothing to require that system to match up with social or religious definitions. Right now there are people who claim that interracial marriages are complete farces. In the end, that is a subjective value. Legal marriage, for the most part, is about tracking who gets certain benefits from the government and setting the legal relationship between two (or more as the case may be) individuals above those of other legal relationships, most of which are automatic by blood.

 

The cast system didn't get to cause a massive famine, Churchill did, from banning ships to move the food to the people who needed it. He got the blood on his hands of 3 million people because he prioritized his white civil servants and his white army. Churchill, the racist with his "The Aryan stock is bound to triumph" and "Keep England White" and called the people who died "a beastly people with a beastly religion"

So you know... let's call it as it is.

I think racists don't get it, when they are against other people's ethnic background,... that it's still racist. No matter what skin color it is.

 

That was rather the point. The ability to give informed consent is the key with regards to legal marriage. If you can find something/one non-human that can actually provide informed consent, then you have an argument. Otherwise it's a moot point.

 

Demographics for one. They are now tracked at all levels of government and business, for a variety of reasons. And yes people have been denied such.

http://www.newnownext.com/non-binary-id-married/04/2019/

Be sure to scroll down to the section dealing with Colorado.

Again, demographics. Before it was asking if you were male or female (most of these are on paper forms, so there is no person verbally asking). Now they ask identity. In some medical applications, they ask for both birth sex and gender ID since birth sex can affect medical issues.

 

On what basis are you using "relevant"? Did you go through the articles?

 

It's a fact that white people do more drug related crimes than black people.
It's a fact that black people get arrested 250% more often than white people
It's a fact that black people get killed more often than white people, % wise
It's a fact that under same circumstances that black people get a harsher sentence vs white
It's a fact that white people get on parole earlier than black people

We got plenty of instances that defend the blue peeps find it correct that black people got shot while fleeing.
But when them defend the blue peeps used their American flag with a blue stripe in it to assault the police....
no shots got fired there... it's all... lets not hurt that predominantly white crowed when they assault the police.

The entire world saw it. Nothing can be denied that US cops behave completely different when confronted by white people

 

Interesting, but what 'black' people?
I doubt many Indians, Pakistanis, Kenyans, Somalis, Ethiopians etc
are making this list what it is.

And getting arrested more often usually comes down to African Americans
committing more crimes.

 

Ah. When black people get arrested more often than white people when it's about violent crimes, it "must be" that they commit more violent crimes.
But when I proved that black people simply get more arrested on drug related charges when white people punch above their weight,...

it's suddenly... lets troll... I don't know what a black person is.
As if, champ, as if.

I can source that white people punch above their weight with drug related crimes, yet black people -surprise surprise- get arrested 250% more often.
I can source that white people statistically got more contraband in their car, yet black people get stopped far more often,... except when it gets dark / when cops can't see clearly what race is behind the wheel.

And again...
We got plenty of instances that defend the blue peeps find it correct that black people got shot while fleeing.
But when them defend the blue peeps used their American flag with a blue stripe in it to assault the police....
no shots got fired there... it's all... lets not hurt that predominantly white crowed when they assault the police.

The jig is up.
Institutionalized racism is firmly established in the US.
Nothing to deny.

 

And yet you accept them hook, line and sinker

You confuse politics with the common good.

Pure nonsense without a gram of evidence.

But they aren't your monuments. They belong to the public. Would it be OK if I tear down your house because of your sickening politics?

 

That is logical.

Applying the same logic you used in the last sentence would lead you an opinion that black people must use drugs above their weight

I can source an opinion about anything. Opinions aren't terribly important since there are so many of them. How could you prove that white people have more contraband in their cars if they aren't stopped. Don't you see the lack of logic in that premise?

Arguing about vanishingly rare occasions doesn't provide a basis for coloring the entire population with your hatred.

Institutions don't engage in racism. People do. Nothing to deny.

 

Except one of these "individuals" would an effing DOG or an effing CAR!

 

Whatever.

Its for the common good that fascists storm the capital and let the succeed to take "their" country?
Whatever.

Seems you're just not keen to look "defund the police" up on wikipedia.
See that I care you're not interested in the subject.

Them aint your monuments either. And in many cases,
the "public" through the voice of the government took plenty of them monuments away.
Incl the statue of Lee the traitor out the US capitol.

 

Whatever.

 

It's logical when you assume the cops do their job correctly.

Nope. The opposite. White people punch above their weight when it comes to drug related crimes, yet black people are arrested 250 times more often.
Using that same logic, it means that police always arrest black people 250 times more often when white people are more criminal, and so cops don't do their job correctly

That's not an opinion. That's a statistic fact through counting.

Their cars are stopped and searched but far less often, % wise. Your idea that no white person ever got stopped and search shows you have ill will to have a honest and logical discussion.

This just adds up how the predominantly white cops get to torture a black man faced down in the handcuffs to death through a 9 minute long public strangulation with fellow cops smiling how the lynching can proceed in brought daylight. That happened before, in all kinds of instances. And what also happened before is a support of it on such a level that those cops rarely fase criminal charges.

It's called like that, when racism is imbedded into normal practice by the people, while normal, it's not openly visible ... until you look at the statistics who gets treated how.
Maybe you should look into it, instead of making dumb remarks showing that you don't know what your talking about but do express an opinion.