PF RULES AND GUIDELINES - Comments Welcome

I believe that "peas" is a mis-spelling of the word that escaped spellcheck.

 

A thread about << how would you state ( decide ) your own behaviour , facing this problem : " the forum on which you are talking is owned by the police " ? >>

Some example of reply :
- Dig a whole in a forest and stay far from socity , growing potatoes and weeds.
- disregard it , behave as usual and ask all of your pal to do the same . ( an operator using the mass information is rendered ineffective in the same way if there is too few info or if there are too many ! look at contrast study in a picture)
- saturation of meaningless things . ( on " war" topic you discuss love troubles btwn different origine of peoples ...aso)
- You open a parallel forum , saying exactly the revers thesys ... under the same " pseudo "

It's not so difficult .Theory of info belongs to all . We can use it as well .

In short , it's a forum thread by itself .

 

how do i message someone? I know this might be a really dumb question :I

 

^your question was answered in the thread you created.

 

Hello,

Few hours ago, I tried to post two short messages on the "abortion" area of the forum and they seem to be lost (not posted).
Where can I see my messages while they are waiting for moderation?

Many thanks!

 

They have been posted. One thread was deleted as it was a duplicate of another.

 

Can we start banning the crazies? You know, the people who never have anything productive to say? Because boy, not having them clutter up the forum would be awesome.

 

We don't have any prohibitions against people being crazy. Of course the moderators would have to ban themselves first because a member has to be crazy to be a moderator.

Shiva_TD
Site Moderator

 

That's crazy talk.

 

Banning the board racists should be priority number one. It's clear who they are, they do not hide it in any way.

 

While I'd very much like that, how do we single out this one group and not ban others as well?

As I see it, the issue is that many, many threads on PF are not started to discuss issues, but to attack this or that group. I am sick to death of "*******s this", "repugs that" types of threads. They serve no positive purpose to the forum whatsoever (with the possible excption of generating traffic for its owner).

It's getting harder and harder to find those few really interesting discussions amongst all this sliming.

 

I don't see much parity between the two sides. The slurs come much more from the right here. And there is no reason at all that blatant racist remarks or innuendos should be tolerated.

 

The degree to which there is parity or a lack thereof isn't the point. The point is that regardless of which side is targeted, those threads do not elevate the level of discussion. Quite the opposite, they drag us down into the mud.

What about blatant remarks and innuendos directed toward Islam or Christianity? What about those things being directed toward gay people? How do we decide what is allowed/disallowed, if we can't agree on what is a prejudice versus what someone thinks is factual?

 

The fact is left wingers do not want anything discussed on here that conflicts their agenda.....that is true of most message boards.....always the leftwingers who want to control the board and censor it.

They seem to think talking about the outrageous levels of black on black and black on white crime should not be discussed....they want to label such discussions regarding public safety as being racist.....absolutely ridiculous.

There are many controversial things in society crying out for attention...but tooooo many want to cover up such matters....thus free speech is on the decline in America.