Ron Paul Wins the Virgin Islands! (Romney Takes Majority of Delegates...)

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by jaktober, Mar 11, 2012.

  1. jaktober

    jaktober Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    As far as the GOP is concerned, in context of the RNC, the Virgin Islands is considered a "state" the same as the 50 States;

    http://www.gop.com/images/legal/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf

    Whenever used in Rule Nos. 25 - 41, “state”
    or “states” shall be taken to include American Samoa,
    the District of Columbia, Guam, Northern Mariana
    Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands

    The most important use of the word "state" is in Rule No. 40; "Nominations":

    (b) Each candidate for nomination for
    President of the United States and Vice President of the
    United States shall demonstrate the support of a
    plurality of the delegates from each of five (5) or more
    states, severally, prior to the presentation of the name of
    that candidate for nomination.​


    If Romney needed it, he'd certainly use his plurality of delegates in the Virgin Islands to count as a "state."

    Ron Paul will likely be able to use Maine, Colorado, Georgia, Washington, Alaska, Nevada, and maybe even Iowa...because he'll likely have the plurality of delegates in those states.

    Again, it isn't about the votes or "winning" states, it's about the delegates, and in context of the Primary (which is what we are talking about); the Virgin Islands is a "state."
     
  2. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you're just demonstrating your inability to understand what facts are

    territories aren't states no matter what abstract concern you apply


    fact: The United States Virgin Islands is an unincorporated territory of the United States.

    fact: this is a complete list of united states states

    1. Alabama
    2. Alaska
    3. Arizona
    4. Arkansas
    5. California
    6. Colorado
    7. Connecticut
    8. Delaware
    9. Florida
    10. Georgia
    11. Hawaii
    12. Idaho
    13. Illinois
    14. Indiana
    15. Iowa
    16. Kansas
    17. Kentucky
    18. Louisiana
    19. Maine
    20. Maryland
    21. Massachusetts
    22. Michigan
    23. Minnesota
    24. Mississippi
    25. Missouri
    26. Montana
    27. Nebraska
    28. Nevada
    29. New Hampshire
    30. New Jersey
    31. New Mexico
    32. New York
    33. North Carolina
    34. North Dakota
    35. Ohio
    36. Oklahoma
    37. Oregon
    38. Pennsylvania
    39. Rhode Island
    40. South Carolina
    41. South Dakota
    42. Tennessee
    43. Texas
    44. Utah
    45. Vermont
    46. Virginia
    47. Washington
    48. West Virginia
    49. Wisconsin
    50. Wyoming
     
  3. reckoning

    reckoning New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2012
    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sshhh dont tell the rest that america has territories around the wolrd....it would make them look imperialistic!!
     
  4. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    i suspect that would only apply to those ignorant of history and lunatics
     
  5. jaktober

    jaktober Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    I think they figured it out when "we" started overthrowing democratically elected leaders and invading countries around the world...

    But yes, the fact we still have Territories is troubling. They should be offered Statehood or the ability to self-govern.
     
  6. jaktober

    jaktober Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    The topic of this thread is the contests involved in the GOP Primary. You say "hasn't won a state." I assume you aren't talking about "winning" in respects to conquering the state and claiming it as their own.

    Romney hasn't "won" any states in the game of world domination, but he has "won" "states" in the GOP Primary, and in all respects to the topic of this thread and the conversation, having won either New Hampshire or the Virgin Islands counts as the same type of "win." And where the rules of the RNC are concerned, both are referenced as "states."

    But if it makes you feel better, let's call them "contests."

    Ron Paul has won a Primary Contest in the Virgin Islands.

    Can you live with that?
     
  7. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    the point is that isn't going to get ron paul nominated, no matter how you jack the wagon up
     
  8. camp_steveo

    camp_steveo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    23,014
    Likes Received:
    6,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    State or territory doesn't matter.

    Paul won popular vote, Romney won delegates.

    This is example of what is happening nationally, except it's Paul winning more delegates in many cases.
     
  9. AJ98

    AJ98 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    187
    Trophy Points:
    63
    And where are those delegates? How do you measure how many delegates are with Paul right now? And if it is so easy to determine what the numbers are, why has the media not picked up on this?
     
  10. jaktober

    jaktober Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2011
    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Honestly, I don't think the media is really that good at the "investigative journalist" aspect of their job. They are very good at maintaining a "reality."

    Here is a story from Seattle, WA where we took all 21 delegates going to the State Convention:

    http://www.dailypaul.com/221373/flash-update-seattle-washington-caucus

    We have a lot of stories like this. We really don't know what the delegate count will be until the State Convention(s) in all of the Caucus states. Then we can have a better number.

    The mainstream media outlets are reporting predictions based on the vote totals of how the delegates will be distributed, but that only works with some of the states, not all. All we are saying, is that in the states where delegates haven't been determined we can't be certain of who will get them, but from our "reports" of supporters attending the county conventions (and who stayed at the Caucus precincts after the vote when the delegates were determined there), we are doing very well, and taking the majority in a lot (but not all) of the Precincts and, now, Counties.

    Still, we have to wait for the State Conventions to know for sure who those states are sending to the RNC as delegates (and how many of them will be voting for Paul).

    Does that help?
     

Share This Page