Sharia in Pennsylvania Muslim admits to attacking atheist Muslim judge dismisses case

I was talking about the accused harrasser (no attack was reported by the cop)

 

dunno....whens the last time a muslim shot an abortion doctor?

 

and this is based on.....?

 

Unless your name really is Mr. The Mello Guy, you should have made the connection that your real name isn't being made available to everyone here at PF.


_

 

wait....so your real name isnt Dong Lock?

lol jk....touche...

 

I'm changing my mind on this.

Seems a bit suspicious that this "assault" happened with all these people around and not one other witness came forward to acknowledge the attack.

Here's the video:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yP-X3hpCfR8"]Muslim attacks Atheist - YouTube[/ame]

Not convincing at all.

Just as the Zombie Muhamed (I couldn't stop myself from chuckling) is allowed the freedom of speech, the Muslim guy is also allowed to express his opinion as long as it isn't violent.

So as it stands: If the Muslim guy did attack him, then he should be charged with assault.

However, there's zero evidence that the altercation was physical or even represented a threat.

 

I'm an atheist... and I have nothing good to say about Islam. That said:

1. Where does anybody get the idea that this judge is a Muslim? It sounded to me like he is not.

2. The judge was absolutely right in his challenge to the plaintiff regarding the Qur'an. Nowhere in it does it say Muhammad rose from the dead. There is not a Muslim source anywhere that makes that claim.

It sounded to me like the plaintiff's case was weak. The judge made the right call.

 

I am of a similar mind.

Look- if anyone was attacked, the attacker should be charged.

But this isn't Sharia.

And it wouldn't be the first time that a judge dresses down someone in a courtroom- frankly I wouldn't be surprised if a judge had dressed down the guy dressed as zombie Pope either.

 

Can't you just be honest enough to actually address the topic? Do you agree with the ruling or not?

 

More politically correct justice from Soetoro regime. Progressive leftist losers suck!

 

That would require actually checking out the links before deciding to claim nothing exists.

I think you are asking too much of some people.

 

To give everyone an idea of what kind of judge it is that they are attacking:

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2008/02/mechanicsburg_judge_headed_to.html#loopbegin

Mechanicsburg District Judge Mark Martin walked into his courtroom Friday afternoon to arraign someone, he thought.
Instead Martin, 44, a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserves who's headed for Iraq, walked into a surprise send-off.

Martin said it will be tough to leave his wife, Patti, and their sons, Eric, Matthew and Robby. Eric and Matthew, 18-year-old twins, graduate from high school this spring. Martin will miss it.

But Martin said he should return in mid-March 2009, in time for 17-year-old Robby to get his diploma.

"This isn't a pity party, though," Martin said. "I feel everyone owes some sort of service to their country. This is the way I choose to serve."

Martin has spent 23 years in the Army and Reserves. He's in charge of the 424th Military Police Deteachment based out of Ashley, Luzerne County. He expects his unit to be deployed to Iraq in April.

The tour will be Martin's second in Iraq.

In his absence, Martin's jurisdiction -- which covers Mechanicsburg and Upper Allen and Monroe townships -- will be handled by Senior District Judge Margaret Bria of Hanover."

Yep- this judge you find so reprehensible is an actual citizen soldier vet with two tours in Iraq.

Odd that people find it important to claim he is a Muslim but don't mention his sacrifice in support of the people of the U.S.

 

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2008/02/mechanicsburg_judge_headed_to.html#loopbegin

This is who you are calling a Progressive leftist loser.

Why am I not shocked this is what you think of our veterans?


Mechanicsburg District Judge Mark Martin walked into his courtroom Friday afternoon to arraign someone, he thought.
Instead Martin, 44, a lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserves who's headed for Iraq, walked into a surprise send-off.

Martin said it will be tough to leave his wife, Patti, and their sons, Eric, Matthew and Robby. Eric and Matthew, 18-year-old twins, graduate from high school this spring. Martin will miss it.

But Martin said he should return in mid-March 2009, in time for 17-year-old Robby to get his diploma.

"This isn't a pity party, though," Martin said. "I feel everyone owes some sort of service to their country. This is the way I choose to serve."

Martin has spent 23 years in the Army and Reserves. He's in charge of the 424th Military Police Deteachment based out of Ashley, Luzerne County. He expects his unit to be deployed to Iraq in April.

The tour will be Martin's second in Iraq.

In his absence, Martin's jurisdiction -- which covers Mechanicsburg and Upper Allen and Monroe townships -- will be handled by Senior District Judge Margaret Bria of Hanover.

 

It doesn't matter if he was a vet. Him being a vet is irrelevant to him taking the side of his religion over the law.

 

And yet you still haven't provided any evidence that he did that.

And I think it is sad that you don't recognize his service to our country.

 

So his service is suppose to negate his decision the let someone go who admitted to a police officer in attacking someone else. And his service allows him to berate the victim during a court trail. Looks like he learned to be more Muslims than American while serving his country to me.

 

LOL he said he was For the love of God listen to the audio.

Which means absolutely nothing to the case of an attack verified by the cop.

If he ignores the police officer's testimony absolutely. But then its just another "pig" right?

 

was he charged with an attack? (*)(*)(*)(*) prosecutor must be muslim too!

 

So the cop witnessed the attack? Do you have the transcript of his recounting the details of the assault that he witnessed.

If you do, you win.

 

What it looks like to me is that if he was an avowed Christian who had acted this exact same way towards a person who had attacked the zombie pope, you wouldn't even be posting.

My point about his service to our country is this: This man has volunteered to serve our country and let himself be put in harms way more than I have- and probably more than you have. He has served in Iraq twice and in the Army for 23 years. He has experience under his belt. He deserves more than casual condemnation. You have very, very limited information and you are assuming that he is acting in a biased fashion, rather than according to the law.

And when John Kennedy was running for President- people were claiming he was more Catholic than American then too. Still just as offensive. Americans are Americans, whether they are Christian, Jewish, Muslims or Atheists.

 

Listen to the audio genius. He goes on about the offensive nature of depicting Mohammad as a zombie which is irrelevant to the case.

I never heard him say that. If he did its appreciated but has nothing to do with his bs ruling.

 

No the cop was told by the Muslim man that he put his hands on the other guy.

Now he denies it. Which is more plausible?

 

I suggest you listen the the judges own remarks. His service has nothing to do with calling the victim a doofus and making a bad judgement. The perp admitted to the officer he put his hands on the victim as per the officers testimony. This judge should not be on the bench as it appears he took the side of his religion over the law.

 

The judge simply found there to inadequate evidence to sustain a charge of "harassment" or "assault".

Conflicting testimony, no bruises or damage to the "victim" or his clothes/costume, no other witnesses in a busy area.

And assault or harassment requires MORE actions than tugging a fake beard, particular when inflammatory speech "Only Mohammed can rape America" is present.

Judge was quite clear about his legal rationale: "there is inadequate evidence to sustain the charges".

That is NOT "Sharia Law", that is American law.

 

Indeed it is, and if there was decent video or witnesses, the criminal charge may have prevailed.

Unfortunately, like the usual altercation between two arguing people. the evidence is lacking.