Sun in a new lower sunspot phase in the coming decades?

No answer until you admit you were wrong.

 

What is the difference between those resource sites and WUWT?

 

Nope. You are wrong again.

 

I was not aware Lindzen had published a paper in 2020 and that is a current paper but the others are now too old to be relevant and you should know that

 

This answer is consistent with your lack of familiarity with the substance as demonstrated in other posts.

 

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf372/meta
https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/6/3/62
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/12/181219093922.htm
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature22315
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_hiatus
https://www.climate.gov/news-featur...s-surface-temperature-stop-rising-past-decade
http://berkeleyearth.org/archive/global-warming-pause/
https://theconversation.com/global-...limate-change-myth-that-refuses-to-die-108524

 

Ooooh! An Ad Hominem how sweet!

 

Mate what has NOT happened is you managing to prove your claim. I posted links to multiple reports on WUWT showing it was unreliable, I demonstrated that it published papers written by unqualified idiots that do not even reach minimum academic standards and I showed Anthony Watts does not have the academic standing to peer review properly

and you have proven the validity of WUWT how?

Now a question

Which source is the main resource informing all governments in relation to climate change? Which document is the “go to guide” for policy makers?

when it comes to actual influence on changing government policy where does WUWT stand?

 

Just an observation. Surely you didn't think you could consistently dodge the work of the topic without being called on that?

 

And yet it cooled.

 

Only according to you

 

Still not answered

 

And CERES, and Berkeley Earth.

 

I assume you refer to the IPCC, and that is the problem.

 

Like it or lump it it is NOY Whatsupmybutt that is being used as the guide for international policy and action it is the IPCC. If you ever want to have more impact on what is happening then you should be addressing that document and guess what? They are about to publish updates. You too can be part of that process!

 

Actually no! Please post the portion that says there has been no warming in the past 20 years

http://berkeleyearth.org/march-2021-temperature-update/

http://berkeleyearth.org/data-visualization/

 

Like the lawyers say, "Fruit of the poisonous tree." Please see Searching for the Catastrophe Signal by Bernie Lewin.

 

Is Lewin going to influence global climate change policy? No? Then how important is this self published piece of rubbish? He could not even get it published by anyone instead it has been funded by a denialist site - suggests it is a complete piece of rubbish but I have posted this before so why are you going back repeatedly to debunked twaddle?

 

Global temperatures are irrelevant to a discussion of US temperatures.

 

Because it is a light shining in the darkness, and I would remind you the story is told in the words of prominent "consensus" scientists -- not one of whom has claimed he was misquoted.

 

Lols!

 

No because it is so obscure no one has even heard of it. It is someone’s made up twaddle floating on an obscure internet site mostly visited by conspiracy theorists. The rest of the world is moving ahead and looking at what the next IPCC reports are going to contain - and you too could be part of it .

 

that is the only response this deserves

 

Oh! BTW do I have your permission to add that quote attributed to you to my signature? I am sure there are loads of people on this board who would also appreciate the humour and irony inherent in that