Supreme Court guts affirmative action in college admissions

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Bluesguy, Jun 29, 2023.

  1. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,155
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good, race should no longer be a determining factor or special consideration in colleges or elsewhere. Equality is the goal not equity across race.


    Supreme Court guts affirmative action in college admissions
    "The Supreme Court says colleges and universities can no longer take race into consideration as an express factor in admissions, a landmark decision that overturns long-standing precedent that has benefitted Black and Latino students in higher education."
    https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/supreme-court-decisions/index.html


    Supreme Court rejects use of race as factor in college admissions, ending affirmative action

    Washington — The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that race-conscious admission policies of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the Constitution, bringing an end to affirmative action in college admissions in a decision that is likely to reverberate across college and university campuses nationwide.

    The court ruled 6-3 along ideological lines in the University of North Carolina case, and 6-2 in the Harvard dispute, as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused. Chief Justice John Roberts authoring the majority opinion.
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/suprem...ce-college-admissions-harvard-north-carolina/

    I have little doubt the left will continue to defend and push for such racist policies.
     
  2. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I have no real feeling for this one way or the other, other than it's another historic failure by the most corrupt SCOTUS grouping in history.

    I assume colleges will have other ways of keeping colleges open to qualified minorities "as an express factor"... they've certainly learned how to do so over the years...

    I'm just going to lurk and watch the racsist roundup begin....
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2023
    9royhobbs likes this.
  3. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is just another excuse of dismantling the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

    that being said, if Asians and whites are thinking that they now have an advantage because of this decision, think again. If you look at California and its rejection of affirmitive action, neither Whites or Asians had any increase in acceptance to the top tier, highly selective universities.
     
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,000
    Likes Received:
    3,615
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ity is a historic success

    It overturns racist policies
     
  5. Vote4Future

    Vote4Future Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    6,975
    Likes Received:
    3,551
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    About time. Keeping affirmative action in place proliferates racism.
     
  6. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Great job America.

    This is absolutely for the better.

    Astounding how the right wing has become the progressives…fighting for things like no racism in college admissions, among other very important topics like freedom of speech.
     
  7. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Clearly you do have “real feelings” on this. This removal of the racist policy seems to have upset you, among many other Dems. This is ok, as it’s part of progress. But progress is happening. America is a better place when we don’t allow racism.
     
  8. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Incorrect, this is actually more in line with civil rights lol.
     
  9. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,671
    Likes Received:
    32,403
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Great Decision on Election Day 2016 by all of the Dem. Primary Voters in key swing states (Disgruntled Bernie Supporters, Etc.) who decided to "make a statement" and NOT vote for Clinton in 2016...
    Whether they "sat it out" or voted 3rd Party/Write-in...
    They sure showed them...:smdh:
     
    9royhobbs and Egoboy like this.
  10. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,155
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why would that change? It is the UNQUALIFIED or LESS Qualified being admitted over the QAULIFIED and MORE QUALIFIED based on race that is being challenged.

    Yes I am watching those who support such racist policies and will be defending them.
     
  11. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,155
    Likes Received:
    39,236
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It reinforces and confirms the 1964 Civil Rights Act. And if you are asserting there will be no change then you should not be concerned then.
     
    roorooroo and Moolk like this.
  12. Talon

    Talon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    46,813
    Likes Received:
    26,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I've had my own complaints with the Roberts Court, most particularly with the Sebelius and Dobbs rulings, but I have no complaint when it does its job and upholds the Constitution as it did with this ruling.

    Interesting (and not surprising) how some of our Leftist/Demokrat friends have a problem with the SCOTUS upholding the Constitution, the 14th Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause:

     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2023
  13. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Exactly lol. If there is no change then why keep it?
     
    roorooroo and gorfias like this.
  14. Tipper101

    Tipper101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    6,103
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    Trophy Points:
    113

    So you have no real feeling for it other than your strong feeling of hatred for it? Lol! Okaaayyyyy…

    ...makes about as much sense as if someone jumped out and said stuff and then declared they were just going to lurk…

    …oh wait…
     
  15. Talon

    Talon Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    Messages:
    46,813
    Likes Received:
    26,367
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    More specifics:

    Now, what to do about the institutions, policies and vested interests that are failing elementary and secondary school students, i.e., our nation's youth...
     
    Turtledude and roorooroo like this.
  16. Tipper101

    Tipper101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    6,103
    Likes Received:
    3,208
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh no doubt these libs are going to do what libs do and try to sneak their racism in there to get the right demographics they want. It’s just now they can be sued for it if they aren’t extremely sneaky indeed…
     
  17. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,556
    Likes Received:
    11,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've been discussing this with others for years. Finally!!! I couldn't be happier that equality under the law is going to be recognized.
     
  18. gorfias

    gorfias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Messages:
    5,517
    Likes Received:
    6,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wish it had been overturned for reasons of the 1st, rather than 14th Amendment. Freedom of association. Hire, fire, provide opportunities to whomever you want for whatever reason you want. That would have gotten the government out of everyone's hair on this. Bureaucracies would shrink. Over head would reduce. Likelihood of court disputes reduced. More money, more freedom. Now, similar bodies will continue to do the socially corrosive cost ineffective nose counting.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2023
    Turtledude likes this.
  19. Alwayssa

    Alwayssa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    32,956
    Likes Received:
    7,587
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not really.
     
  20. Bearack

    Bearack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2011
    Messages:
    7,872
    Likes Received:
    7,454
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your statement is literally the epitome of a oxymoron!
     
    glitch, CornPop, Turtledude and 3 others like this.
  21. Moolk

    Moolk Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2020
    Messages:
    19,283
    Likes Received:
    14,619
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Objectively speaking it is.
     
  22. Reality

    Reality Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    21,640
    Likes Received:
    7,714
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Discrimination based on race is unconstitutional.

    Serious question: Can you even name the case which started affirmative action? Can you describe the reasoning that authorized it? Can you state the limitations on it which were described in that case?
    Are you even able to find it by googling around after I've given you the hint?
     
    Turtledude and roorooroo like this.
  23. HockeyDad

    HockeyDad Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2019
    Messages:
    5,320
    Likes Received:
    6,909
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Dude, the only thing anybody should care about is if the most competent (regardless of race) are the ones being trained to be our engineers, scientists or doctors. Our safety is dependent on the most talented being elevated. When the playing field is level, I don't have to worry that the person piloting the jet I am on is a diversity hire. There is a reason that South Africa's infrastructure is in shambles and they will completely collapse in the next decade, diversity hires replaced competent people in critical positions across the entire spectrum. Diversity hires always mean someone more competent did not get the job. They contribute to inefficiency, injury and death.
     
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2023
    Turtledude, Mrs. b., Steve N and 3 others like this.
  24. gorfias

    gorfias Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Messages:
    5,517
    Likes Received:
    6,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The defense of AA was all about this. They were already pushing the idea that adding someone to the student body because of their race made things gooder. This may end up like trying to keep schools from grooming children. They will try to find a way to fit the child molestation agenda one way or another ie, "OK, we'll stick to math: if John has 5 anal beads and Fred as 6, how many do they have in total?"
     
    Turtledude and Steve N like this.
  25. Collateral Damage

    Collateral Damage Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2012
    Messages:
    10,535
    Likes Received:
    8,149
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I tend to view things in a simple manner.

    If race was a key factor in making sure certain quotas were being met in college entrance, then it's a discrimination against those who were qualified, but didn't have the 'quota' skin color.

    That pretty much is the definition of discrimination.
     
    gorfias, drluggit, Eleuthera and 7 others like this.

Share This Page