The 2011 Right Wing Debate Handbook

76. Look for derogatory ways of saying “Liberal” as the only brush with creativity you will ever have in your life.

 

Thank You! I knew they had to be in there somewhere.

 

Decry excessive spending for Social Security, Medicare, Welfare, Unemployment, while not a whisper about Corporate welfare, Oil subsidies, and Military Industial complex excessive spending.

Claim to be a Constitutional party, while supporting War on Terror, Homeland Security, Enhanced Interrogation, Intrusive body searches at airports, government regulation of pregnant women, demanding Christianity as national religion, Corporate bribing as free speech, profiling non caucasian races, Taxing US citizens to support Foriegn countries, and secret meetings of Congressmen and President with Bilderbergers.

 

77. Stigmatize socialism to help rich Americans.

 

78. White sheets must be pressed and starched before every rally.

 

This is grossly unfair as the vast majority of conservatives aren't members of the KKK.

 

79. Never condemn a Republican for any scandal. Excuse their behavior. Bring up Barney Frank as a distraction. This is not hypocritical when you do it. However, never allow a Democrat in a moral quagmire to go without endless criticism. Never apply your claimed morality to your own party.

 

80. Michelle Bachmann is a viable candidate and back her. Never note the fact that she has no platform at all. Ignore her pork projects and farm subsidies, as fiscal conservatism does not apply to Republicans, it is only something that Democrats should be condemned for being without.

 

81. Mock Obama for his verbal gaffes, and call him an idiot for saying there are 57 states. If a republican says something equally as stupid, claim media bias and divert back to the president. Again, this is not hypocrisy as only Democrats should be condemned for stupid statements.

 

82. If a Republican candidate says something historically incorrect, read deeply into their statement and the historical facts and spin said facts so as to make it appear as what they say aligns with history.

 

And many democrats are in the kkk, and they make excuses for it...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqPq4AHjzU4"]YouTube - ‪Bill Clinton Explains Robert Byrd's Membership In KKK‬‏[/ame]


Leftys simply Lie​

 

we don't wear white sheets anymore.

the barbeque sauce stains too easily.

PS we call the meetings "barbeques" nowadays

psst..... this ^ is a secret

 

83. Say this^

 

LOL -- how many times have I seen that one.

 

would you care to be the guest of honor at our next rally.... errr barbeque?

 

clinton made more sense in those few words than anything i've ever seen you write, over the last several years

 

84. Never be subtle. Loud, ugly, bolded, infantile signature lines are the go. Aesthetics were never for you. Succint and mature is not for you either, so cram in as many juvenile, feeble words in that signature line as you can. Then sit back and enjoy the fruits of your total lack of aesthetics and class.

 

NOT ALL CONSERVATIVES ARE RACIST, but all racists are conservative.

UnAmerican not to be for Obama,Government=Solution,Patriotism=Paying Taxes

Democrats: Freedom For Poor Republicans: Freedom For Rich

 

Or, at least try to change History in Wikipedia to agree with what they said.

How sad is it that a Wikipedia administrator has to inform Palin's "followers" that she is not an expert on Paul Revere? Who are these folks that are willing to spread outright lies in order to prove a point? They're taking this Tammy Wynette "Stand by Your Man" thing a little too far.

Palin was dead wrong on this historical fact, as she is on many others. Part of her charm for her followers is the constant stream of gaffes in which she appears to find comfort, not to mention her ability to poke fun at herself. Royally messing up the story of Paul Revere is not unexpected from Sarah Palin, but her followers' attempt to change history in such an overt way is a little unexpected. Instead of editing Wikipedia and history, perhaps they should edit Sarah Palin?
http://www.theroot.com/buzz/palins-...e-paul-revere-wikipedia-entry-match-her-facts

 

85: Ignore the law when it suits you. Remember, if your opinion is different to that of the law, the law is obviously wrong and you are always right.

86: It is permissible for a right winger to break the law when he sees fit. Remember, the law does not apply to you. However, if a left winger breaks the law he should be hung, drawn and quartered.

 

87. When all else fails- call Obama a childish name.

88. If a right wing proposes a tax hike, it's called "spending cuts."

89. If you're wrong, spout out-of-the-arse statistics or call the other person a America-hater.

90. When asked for a source, refuse to provide one. Instead, distract the other person by calling them a child, even though the person you're arguing with is 14 years old.

91. Anyone that disagrees with you is a ________ (idiot, loony leftie, 2 year old, etc.)

 

92. Remember- laws, morals and standards do not apply to you.

 

93: Create a thread complaining of the amount of Bachmann / Palin threads liberals have created. All while completely ignoring the simple fact that you yourself have done exactly what you are complaining about.


94: When anyone is critical of Bachmann / Palin on their political positions, never have a calm open debate with said person. Instead, claim that the member being critical of either Bachmann's or Palin's political views is either a woman hater or are very afraid of them.

 

95) When confronted with actual facts, post a plethora of hyperbole rhetoric in a deceptive ploy to divert from the actual topic at hand. Every now and then, accuse your opponent that they are lying without providing substantial proof to support a claim.

96) Occasionally, inject superior debating skills into the topic of discussion. Examples "I like green eggs and ham" "I like peanut butta" "I like jam"

97) When all else fails, mumble.

98 ) Use one liner synopsis to throw your opponent into a whirlwind of frenzy.

99) Accuse your opponents that they are a waste of a billion years of evolution.

 

95. Forum rules only apply to Liberals. If a Liberal does so much as make a typo, spend every waking moment of your life trying to get them banned. If a right- wing posts a flame, read deeply into thier post and spin so they are not insulting.

96. Assume every stupid thing a right-wing posts has a double meaning.

97. Always play the innocent, helpless victim being verbally attacked by the vicious Liberals, who kidnapped you and are trying to brainwash poor little you.

98. Post angry, flaming threads expressing hate for a certain person (usually a liberal or a child) or a group of people. Then when the person you insulted posts an angry response, say "I never said that!" Once again, look like you are being attacked, so everyone will take your side.

99. If you can't make an arguement:
--------------------------------
1. Throw in a strawman.

2. Deny everything you said before.

3. Claim you already made your argument.

4. Post "statistics" that support your position.

5. Insist you are right over and over again.

6. Log off. Then log back on the next day and claim you had to do something.

7. Have other, smarter people argue for you.

8. Leave the forum.

9. Make up fake statements the other person said.

10. Repeat your bad argument.

11. If other people back up your opponent, accuse them of blackmail.

12. Tell on the other person to the moderators.

13. Call the other person a baby.

14. Post random words and pictures that have nothing to do with life.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

100. Remember- attack the poster not the post.