The Best thing of all about the GA Indictment...

Once the Traitor-in-Chief is INDICTED in GA he CANNOT be preemptively PARDONED by the governor.

ALL pardons in the state MUST go through the Board of Parole and Pardons instead.

While all members of the board were appointed by GOP governors they cannot issue a preemptive pardon either.

So that leaves TWO options for the Twatwaffle, one is that he is acquitted which is about as likely to occur as Jesus returning so don't hold your breath.

The second is a STIPULATION that the Board may only grant pardons "after conviction" with another stipulation being that the "full sentence obligation" has to be completed first.

Therefore Inmate Tramp will have to SERVE his ENTIRE "sentence obligation" which includes any and fines.

That is when the clock only STARTS for Blabbermouth Boy, he cannot be associated with anything remotely dubious for ANOTHER 5 YEARS in order to be ELIGIBLE for a pardon.

So with the MINIMUM sentence in the charges being 5 years it would be at least TEN YEARS before he can expect to ELIGIBLE for a pardon following his CONVICTION.

So it really doesn't matter if he wins in 2024, if he LOSES the case in GA he is facing at least 1,825 days in confinement where he is just another loser in an orange uniform.

The Gobfather's one and only hope is to be acquitted but with Bobblehead Rudy as a codefendant the odds of that happening are not worth bothering to consider.

Now that we can sleep easier knowing that incarceration is only a matter of time does that change how Repub PRIMARY voters are going to consider their alternatives?

If you know for a fact that making him the RNC Nominee and then winning the 2024 election will still NOT enable him to step foot inside the Oval office again what other option would you pick?

Speaking only for myself my LAST choice would be meatball Ron which means he is most likely to be the alternative and he has already promised to pardon the Red Man Balking. Is that enough to make him the GOP nominee?

Tim Scott is the best option from my perspective but I would have to hold my nose, shut my eyes and be heavily sedated before he would actually get my vote because of the GOP BAGGAGE that would come with him into the Oval office.

So the BEST thing has just happened applies to the GOP Primary, Republicans no longer have to support the Bigliest Loser of them all. They can give the others a good hard look and see if there is anyone else who could fill those tiny shoes.

Your thoughts?


https://www.businessinsider.in/poli...ication guidelines,thereafter as well as five

 

Election fraud in a general federal election is a federal crime. Rather than every podunk county prosecutor filing charges, it should be left to the federal government. This is nothing more than an effort to pile on separate indictments and trials that can be scheduled to interfere with the primary's and general election. In addition, they appear to coincide with evidence that Joe Biden has received millions in illegal money.

I see more evidence of Joe Biden's guilt than Trump's.

I don't want to vote for Trump, but the democrats are convincing me that is the right thing to do.

 

States do not give up jurisdiction of their laws to the feds ever.

Seek an eye doctor, there are rumors but no actual evidence against Joe Biden. There is however volumes against T****.

You'll vote for someone because they're charged with multiple crimes in multiple courts in multiple states and DC to spite others? Think about that because I can't respond here.

 

Answer one simple question. Why does the Biden family have over twenty LLC shell companies with no family business?

 

None of that has anything to do with showing the evidence that you (falsely) claimed exists. So of course you are desperate to now shift the goalposts because you know the original claim you made is worth less than dog ****. That many shell companies (as with the Trump family) could show that Hunter is up to some shady **** . . . and?

 

It was a simple question. Why can't you answer it?

The Trumps have numerous legal companies. The Biden's have none.

 

Because I'd rather talk about your original claim. If you talk about what you originally said, then sure, I'll talk to you about this braindead take as well.

Where is your evidence that none of the companies are illegal, and why are you so desperate to run and hide in fear from your original claim? Why can't you talk about your original claim? Do you need someone to remind you what you actually said or do you now realize how braindead it was and are trying to save face by talking about something else? Last I checked, Trump has had to shut down a couple of companies due to fraud and his main company has been found guilty of being criminal. Whoops. Didn't think about that much before typing, did you?

 

What Trump's disclosure of his 500 LLCs can and can't tell us
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/taxes/what-trump-s-disclosure-his-500-llcs-can-can-t-n874391

 

Numerous people have come forward and said Joe Biden was receiving money through Hunter's business dealings. However, I consider those to be "he said, they said" until bank records are reviewed, which I understand is in progress. However all those LLC shell companies tells me that the Bidens are hiding something. Proof positive for me.

 

Where's the evidence . . . which even your own people say they haven't found?

Trump's family has far more. And I'm sorry your standards for rational thought are that low.

 

I did not see anything in the article which indicated that they are shell companies.

 

Biden's LLCs are just shells. They are there on paper only and they are usually used to hide transfer money illegally. I see nothing that indicates Trumps LLCs are shell companies.

 

Lol, that's cute. Thank you for admitting you haven't even spent two seconds looking into either family's LLCs. And let us know when you finally find evidence of this illegal activity that you are claiming. Meanwhile, funny how you have no problem the Trump companies that have been shut down after being exposed as cons, such as Trump University, or with their main company . . . which has been proven to be criminal.

 

So. You can't explain why the Biden's have all those LLC shell companies with no legitimate business.

By the way, it does not have to be one or the other. Both Trump and Biden can be corrupt. That has been my point, the democrats are piling indictments on Trump to interfere with the election and to distract from Biden's criminal empire.

 

It just takes one stubborn trump supporting juror out of the 12 in the beet red state of Georgia,and your entire post is used kitty litter.

 

You haven't shown there is no legitimate business and you are still running away and hiding from your original claim, which you are dishonestly refusing to discuss because you know it is bull ****.

There is no evidence (unlike with Trump) of Joe Biden being involved in a "criminal empire." And your position that anyone running for president should be held above the law (and, yes, that IS what you are saying about Trump) is lower than dog ****. If you actually cared about the election (and no one defending Trump actually does), then you'd want to see this case go to trial ASAP.

 

We know what business the Trump's are involved. Generally real estate and companies which are in trouble. We know of none for the Biden family. So why all the LLC shell companies?

I have said repeatedly that I don't want Trump or Biden as president. However, I do object to the democrats piling on numerous indictments in an obvious effort to keep Trump from running a campaign and to distract from Biden. The timing makes it all too obvious.

It appears that you are guilty of everything you accuse me of. Going after Trump while ignoring Biden's more than obvious criminal activities.

.

 

Lol, dude, no, most of Trump's companies are ill-defined and are not real estate companies. They are shell companies to move money around. And he has FAR more of them than the Bidens do. And since you can't even remember what your original claim was, you still can't link this back to Joe Biden.

I disagree with your stated position that Trump should be held above the law just because he is running for office. It sickens me.

I haven't objected to investigating Hunter Biden at all, bud. You are projecting your hypocrisy onto me. As for Joe Biden, there is far, far, far, far more evidence of Trump's criminal activities. As in, you've provided absolutely jack **** when it comes to your imagined Joe Biden criminal activities and are incapable of addressing the obvious Trump criminal activities that are outlined in the indictments that you are unwilling to read or discuss because they scare you and you are, in fact, in the bag for Trump.

 

@Derideo_Te

Why would an innocent man need pardoned?

 

I have seen nothing that indicated they are shell companies. However, again, it does not have to be one or the other. Both can be corrupt and it appears obvious to me that Joe


Biden is. He has consistantly lied about knowledge of Hunter's business when there have numerous meetings and telephone calls with Joe Biden present and visits to the White House.

You are making stuff up. I have said that numerous people have come forward and tied Joe Biden to Hunter's business dealings. Everything from Hunter's notebook to business partners.

Again you are making stuff up. Where have I once said that Trump is above the law?

 

The same person who testified that those meetings happened also testified that no business was discussed. Catch up.

And I asked for evidence and you ran and hid. Which you will do again.

Every time you object to indictments like this one because of his campaign, which you have done repeatedly, you are saying he should be held above the law. Every. Time. It isn't my fault they are succeeding where your side is failing and ACTUALLY producing EVIDENCE.

 

In the telecons. The Biden's were on speaker phones. And Joe Biden heard nothing of the conversation except weather? Really? Business associates visited the while around three dozen times and only made courtesy calls. Really? You believe that?

No you are making stuff up. I object to waiting until it interferes with the election. I have never said he was above the law.

 

That's all we have testimony or evidence for. Him calling and chatting with his dad about non-business stuff. I'm sorry the facts upset you, but those are the facts.

Either you want to see this indictment go through or you want to hold him above the law. There are no other positions.

 

All those phone calls and all those meetings and Joe Biden knows nothing about his son's business. Really. I know as much as national security allows about my son's businesses and my grand sons and grand daughters for that matter. I have not met with any of them more than a time or two. Joe Biden's claims of lack of knowledge are beyond belief.

A binary statement which is simply not true.

 

There is no evidence any business was discussed. Much the opposite. I'm sorry the evidence says you are full of ****.

The statement is tautological.