The Best thing of all about the GA Indictment...

Thank you for CONCEDING that ALL you have is DUBIOUS circumstantial "evidence" that no prosecutor would use for an indictment because they already KNOW that they CANNOT prove it in court BEYOND a "reasonable doubt" which means that Biden gets the BENEFIT of the Presumption of Innocence.

Grasping at straws is all you have now.

Sad!

 

Invest in a good pair of glasses. That will help.

 

Good thread. Thanks for making it.

 

I think you “see” what you want to see…

 

Speed reader? You posted this in three minutes after my link went up. Impressive. What am I thinking, you could say what you did without actually reading the article. Never mind.

 

I don't even use straws. Sorry you had to read an opposing opinion. Sad.

 

A concession is your opinion. I didn't fulfill your request. Thank you for conceding that you can't seem to read the news.

 

I didn't make a claim. I posted an opinion. Opinions are not fact hence they can't be substantiated. Why do I continue to have to remind you of this.

I agree. It won't happen. Biden will get away with it.

 

Biden has nothing to do with Georgia and that is the one T**** needs to worry about because no one can give him a pardon and the crimes come with minimum time to be served. A guilty there and he dies in prison or in exile. I do grant that he'll likely be given apple chance to flee into exile.

 

You did say something similar to that. I will see if I can find it.

 

So. You believe that LLCs are damning.

 

You said "Joe Biden would never knowingly commit a crime. Anyone can unknowingly commit one.". That was from "
Would someone on the right explain this to me?
" Post:#154.

 

She is NOT required to prosecute it. The crime is a STATE crime if anything but she is going outside even the STATE and it for a federal office so the FEC has jurisdiction. If we are going to allow every county DA in the country to take a President to court then I bet the are several hundred out there who could dream up charges against Biden right now.

This is a FEDERAL matter. Just watch as the defense lawyers start filing their motions, Meadows already has.

 

It was a legal challenge under the Electoral College Act and you just proved why this will go to the Federal courts that is a FEDERAL LAW a county DA has no jurisdiction under it.

 

ROFLMAO no your attempt to compare to Capone was the PATHETIC and inane deflection.

 

Yes there still cases before the courts and more challenges to come. The reporting at the time refutes the entire "fake electors" claims they were perfectly legal and it was quite prudent to have those votes on the record.

 

Nope nothing illegal about it as I showed you from the reporting at the time. The changes would only go into effect IF by some miracle Trump won a court case making the certified list void. The date for the electors having cast their votes having past would have meant the state of GA would HAVE NO VOTE IN THE EC. It was perfect reasonable to have an alternate set in place, that had no legal standing unless such a court decision, to protect the EC vote for the STATE.

 

If only hardcore Trumpers would stick to their fake legal arguments.

Grand jurors who voted to indict Trump in Georgia earlier this week are facing threats and a profusion of racist comments online.

The jurors’ names were listed publicly within the indictment, as required under Georgia law. A review of social media platforms and far-right forums found users posting numerous racial slurs and even the jurors’ addresses.

“MAGAs posting the grand jurors addresses online,” a Truth Social user wrote. “I see a swift bullet to the head if, and when, somebody shows up at their homes.”​

“Everyone on that jury should be hung,” one user wrote on a right-wing online forum.

On a different far-right site, the purported addresses of all 23 grand jurors tapped to serve in Trump’s case were posted in full.

“MAGAs posting the grand jurors addresses online,” a Truth Social user wrote. “I see a swift bullet to the head if, and when, somebody shows up at their homes.”

[https://thehill.com/regulation/cour...trump-georgia-case-face-threats-racist-abuse/]​

 

If you don't preface an opinion as 'IMO, or in my view', it can easily be seen as a claim of fact. Keep that in mind when you toss your 'opinions' about.

You're last sentence implies Biden has committed illegal acts.

I take it that, too, is your 'opinion'. But, since you have provided no evidence, or unless you do, there is no point in continuing the conversation.

 

You wrote:
Your faith in Biden that he cannot possibly do wrong

I wrote:
Joe Biden would never knowingly commit a crime

That I wrote 'Joe Biden would never knowingly commit a crime', I have just admitted that it IS possible Joe could commit a crime, in direct conflict with your claim.

Now then, why are you making this sh*t up?

 

the rest of this post being only an attempt to divert the discussion.​

And when you can't refute the facts dodge and divert.

 

You said he would never knowingly commit a crime. He committed a crime when he possessed unprotected classified documents. Are you claiming he did not know he had classified documents or are you claiming that was not a crime?

 

Point addressed in a prior comment, look for it.

 

You should probably look up which jurisdiction Fanni works under. Hint: not the federal government.

Also, there's no such thing as the "Electoral College Act," but if there were it would be a federal law and it would need to have a criminal enforcement mechanism.

 

Your desperate need to divert attention from the consequences of the Georgia indictments is understandable.

Lowlife Trumpers threatening innocent Americans who performed their patriotic duty is not something you'd want to have to address.