The greatest night yet in the Ron Paul Revolution!

What simple question did you ask? I'll be happy to answer any rational intelligent question. Do you have one?

 

Simple math would tell you there is 50 states < well unless you are Obama>

 

read his post.
You do know how to read, no ?

 

I'm well aware that there are 50 states. Paul has won NONE and will win none. So what does 50 states mean? They're there, he'll lose. Where is the question I'm supposed to be not answering? Paul won't even last for all 50 primaries.

By the time Super Tuesday is over the score will be
Others 22
Paul 0

Maybe Paul will win his home state of Texas on Apr 3.

Then the score will be
OTHERS 35
Paul 1

After that, he'll go home to retirement.

And Paul won't win any of b.o.'s 6 or 7 imaginary states either. And I doubt Paul will ride on b.o.'s Intercontinental Rail Road either.

 

Ron Paul's results:

3rd in Iowa.

Clear 2nd in NH.

Based solely on these numbers - is the latter better then the former for Ron Paul...yes or no?

 

Are you lamely asking if Paul did better in NH than he did in Iowa?

If that is your attempt at an intelligent question, then YES. Paul did better in NH than Paul did in Iowa. But he LOST both places. Paul isn't running against Paul. He's running against the other candidates who are waxing his ass. Romney did better in NH too. MUCH better. You are desperately grasping at fog. WINS count. Losses are losses.

The losses will mount, the wins won't happen.

 

Heck why even have the primaries! The great and all knowing Dan40 has spoken!

 

the closet liberals do love their statists.
They'll get one alright.

 

If my much greater experience and knowledge bothers you, go play in the kids area. This is for the big boys. This is about the fate of a NATION. Not a silly assed ideal.

I made the simplest easiest prediction. Paul will not be a factor. Otherwise, you evidently didn't notice that I said the score will be "OTHERS" 35 Paul 1. I don't know who will win. But I know Paul won't. As I knew Palin wouldn't run. and I knew Bachmann had no chance. As I know Perry has no chance. Don't you know any of that as well? Cain getting slaughtered by the obama slime machine was a bit of a surprise. The obamalamaloopas struck Cain early and viciously,,,,,,,,,and successfully. No way did they want to even think about losing the RACE CARD for the loony liberals to play. I knew they'd attack him, but they struck way sooner than I expected.

My concern is THE Candidate vs. the incompetent incumbent clown fool idiot obama. Paul isn't it. b.o. would bury Paul. EASILY. b.o. could even tell the truth [if he knew what it is] and still beat Paul.

 

I am actually surprised you answered it.

Now was that so hard?

You spent about one hundred times more words trying to avoid answering it then just typing 'yes' or 'no'.

 

So you are just arrogant and you back up your "knowledge" with fine rants like the above. Judging me when you know nothing about me is pretty comical. Thanks for the laugh.

 

ARG SC POLL: Romney 29%, Gingrich 25%, Paul 20%
Submitted by brooks.popwell on Fri, 01/13/2012 - 11:56
in
Ron Paul 2012
43
votes
ARG POLL (Jan 11-12)

Romney 29%
Gingrich 25%
Paul 20%
Perry 9%
Santorum 7%
Undecided 7%
Other 2%
Huntsman 1%

"Paul has gained the most and Rick Santorum has lost the most since the last American Research Group survey on January 4-5. In that survey, Paul was at 9% and Santorum was at 24%."

http://www.dailypaul.com/203727/arg-sc-poll-romney-29-gingrich-25-paul-20

 

I know everything I need to know about you.

You are very gullible and easily swayed by empty words. And you find truth and reality hard to accept.

And if that makes you laugh, all the sadder for you.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep.../republican_presidential_nomination-1452.html

 

Ok. I believe you i really do . Whatever makes you happy man.