This popped up on my Facebook newsfeed via a friend of mine. I really think its a trolling effort but I'm not sure, but in any case I bet you all can tell me what's wrong with this blog article.
The first urge is to classify this as trolling but this idea is definitely a wet dream for a lot of feminists.
What's wrong with it is the title the "New Era" of Feminism. What new era? They've been preaching this junk all along. Hope you read some of my postings of these man-hating lesbos. Would like to get the forum feminist Gwen's views on this. It was Gwen who said she and her feminist friends enjoyed and put much effort into creating a wonderful family unit. HaHa.......cut the testes off of men and there will be no family unit. Just saying.
I'm sure she was joking. For the most part, anyway. I know a lot of feminists who are quite hetero and have the sexual appatites of a bonobo, provided they can find a real man. I dated one in college, as a matter of fact. She and more than one or two of her friends occassionally suggested Bobbitizing a man or two if they got abusive or callous, but were, otherwise, quite happy with a good romp with a man. I would suggest that Libhater and SiliconMagician look into some new underwear. Something in Kevlar would be a good investment.
Whatever. I kick them out afterward, no sleep overs. So no one is going to be bobbiting me. Whether you and your fembots want to admit it or not. It is quite possible to be a sexy, charming and politie gentleman and still not trust women farther than you can throw them. Women do not have some magical "misogyny" meter. Just becuase I have a healthy distrust of the female mind with all its devious antics does not make me an asexual troll incapable of having healthy sexual relations with women. It also doesn't make a violent woman beater either. Dominant does not mean violent. Most men see women as the weaker sex. I know better. I see them as what they are. Genetically predisposed to screw me over the first opportunity that comes along to improve the quality of life of her and her offspring. Evolutionary psychology proves this. All that translates to is I keep one hand on my wallet and never mingle finances or bank accounts or give them too much information that they could use against me at a later time. I am nothing more than the "jerk" or "(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)" that women love, and husbands hate.
I just found it funny that she said every man will participate in "Castration Day," lest they be treated as a criminal and murdered, as if men can't get access to weapons and use them effectively. LOL.
The Femitheist does have a point though. Over the years, my "orchestra stalls" have gotten me into shiploads of trouble. On the other hand, I`ve had a ball doing all of the wonderful, mad stuff that testosterone demands, christ it`s been fun. Wouldn`t have it any other way, I`d be happy to carry at least three more around, if they`d fit, even though I wouldn`t be able to walk, wouldn`t care, I`d just bounce around. I`d be bitter and jealous too, if I was the Femitheist.
Whats so new about that? That was always an open or underlying aim of feminists. Cynically they try to use health problems as an excuse. The opposite is the case, oftentimes you have to treat men with testosterone when the natural production is reduced to prevent cancer, strong depressions and other problems. Its the hormone which is responsible for our muscle growth (not only in males). Take the production completely off, is a desaster for the person.
Nah what'll happen is small primitive populations of wild males would exist and the femizonians will hunt these specimens for superior genetics. The rest will be eunuch slaves, considered unsuitable for breeding. This will all follow the universal 80/20 rule. The top 20% males will be prized wild studs. The 80% beta males will be castrated slaves bound to a mistress.
Sounds like the future is the plot of a crazy sci-fi film. I feel like I have seen this plot on Futurama already.
I'm going to get a hell of a lot of flak for this... The simple truth of the whole feminist movement is this: It will only be around as long as men are willing to tolerate it. The breaking point just hasn't been hit yet. Women's rights? Well, they have them because men were convinced to allow it to happen. Everything done for women exists only because men feel it is okay - currently. Ultimately it comes down to brute force and intelligence. Women certainly have intelligence, as do men, but are left wanting when it comes to brute force. This cute fantasy that men will be slaves to women? Well, I doubt it will ever work for any prolonged period of time. Because it will take men to enforce it. It only takes a few guys to wise up and women are back on bottom. I don't think women should be slaves, but I don't think men be either. If radical women's group push too far and succeed short term with menacing misandric policies, the following misogyninistic back hand will put them back in the kitchen, chained up, barefoot, and pregnant - but without any of the romance it normally took to get there, or a vote to change things back. Feminists really need to back off. Or become familiar with pain, and confinement. If they really had conviction they would do their protests is a muslim country like Afghanistan.
Yup, this has totally been on the agenda at the monthly mandated NOW meetings. Menions watch out herstory begins today.
Brute force ehh? Well you can bring your fists to this fight, we will bring our guns. The article is a joke even if it was written in earnest.
Are you operating under the assumption that men cannot use guns or obtain them? I certainly hope not. Because such a conflict would go horribly bad for the female side of the fight. But yes, the article is rather pathetic. Interestingly enough the link was busted too.
Can you provide a link to your source Anders? Also I'd imagine feminists would be against male circumcision as it violates an infant's rights bodily integrity and he gets absolutely no say in the matter. http://community.feministing.com/2010/06/07/being-allies-against-male-circumcision/ http://community.feministing.com/2010/06/04/feminism-and-male-circumcision/ The idea that any human being should be forced to have a part of their body removed against their will is disgusting and evil in my opinion. It should always be a personal choice and never forced.
I have found the Women's Rights section of this forum to always oblige with such a need. It would more aptly be categorized under the Humor and Satire section.
Yeah, the humor almost always comes in when people believe there should be set aside rights for women, for minorities, for obese people, for drug addicts, for abortion, for buying condoms and for all those leech supporters of santa claus obama who find it natural that they get their food stamps, their WIC, their welfare checks and their obamaphone on time.
Why not sew an artificial penis onto these feminist women instead? Afterall, it is what they really want, deep down inside, though they can never admit it.
Seeing how 100% of these wymin calling themselves feminazis have lesbo tendencies anyway, they're already well stocked with a lifetime supply of mammoth sized dildos. The liberal men that call themselves feminazis are already dedicated to bone puffing the big one.
