UK must accept free movement says EU

What is it with you and your racism? Didn't the Nazis try to wipe out the Poles for being untermenchen? What kind of complex do you people have anyway, that you are trying to mimic the attitudes of the very people who looked on you as being inferior?

 

Polish are both more Aryan, and indigenous to Europe than are the Germans.

No wonder why Germans have been so barbaric.

 

That's what globalists say. But, 95% of your wealth should be taken from you and shared with others too.

Anyway, at least you admit that when Clinton says she's for "free trade" she also means to have 100% purely open borders to anyone including eliminating the INS and firing all border patrol agents - at least in your theory.

"Free trade" has NOTHING to do with "open borders." But at least more and more Democrats are admitting that want the USA open to BILLIONS of impoverished immigrants, radicals and anyone else who wants to come here - as the price of "free trade," which they declare is a edict from God.

 

I watched a few videos of Farage speaking to a reporter and to the EU parliament. He seems to be a brilliant man. I hope he stays safe; and runs for Prime Minister.

 

Kissinger lays blame for Brexit at Obama's feet.
~
Brexit is a classic illustration of the law of unintended consequences... The manner in which the U.S. administration and other advocates of Remain sought to influence the Brexit vote illustrates the point. The threat that without the support of Europe, a solitary Britain would move to the end of the line in negotiations with Washington reversed the historical sequence of that relationship. The “special relationship” is founded in the origins of America, in a common language and in a comparable system of political values reinforced by fighting together in common wars. The idea of the special relationship was enunciated by Winston Churchill not as a refutation of a multilateral world, but as the guarantor of its values in the hard times sure to follow World War II.

That special relationship is needed for the Atlantic world to traverse the present crisis. A disintegrating Europe could subside into an impotent passivity that will shrivel the entire Atlantic partnership, which represents one of the greatest achievements of the past century. Britain, in whatever mutually respectful legal status it arranges with Europe, is an essential element in this design. Its history and emotion are Atlantic; its current necessity requires as well a link to Europe. Today’s established international order was founded upon conceptions that emerged from the British Isles, were carried by Europe around the world, and ultimately took deep root in North America. American leadership in reinvigorating the contemporary order is imperative.
[/quote]
http://www.wsj.com/articles/out-of-the-brexit-turmoil-opportunity-1467151419

 

Don't believe that. History can be very subjective depending on who is writing or interpreting it. Also you don't know what laws existed before the European colonists arrived. More than likely the humane laws today throughout the world, is probably an outcome of the Christian laws brought in by the colonists. An example would be the banning of suttee, where a widow was burned alive at her husbands death in India. It's even assumed that 60 thousand people were sacrificed each year by the Aztecs.

Another example would be the black slaves in the Ottoman Empire. The boys were made eunichs, and they were lucky if they survived the ordeal... and the girls were taken as concubines. That there are no mulattoes in those countries today, is because the children born of black slaves were killed outright.

Slavery became outlawed with Attaturk. I read that when the Circassian Muslims were invited into Turkey to escape the war in Russia, most of them ended up on the slave market in Istanbul. Since the girls were exceptionally good looking and highly prized, the men rid themselves of all their black concubines, and bought Circassian women.

 

That is certainly a matter of opinion. I personally don't find most Arab men attractive. As for women, no one beats women who have hair that lights up like a golden aura when the sun hits it. No one can beat women who have eyes that you can peer into the soul with. No one beats women with long thin legs, with a body to match. Western women are the most beautiful women in the world. There are a thousand shades of light hair and a thousand different colors of eyes with Western women. Dark eyes and dark hair with thick legs is redundant. I would bet you look Persian, or are Persian.

 

The upper caste Indians are probably the most Aryans. The Poles don't look like them...neither did the Germans.

For heaven's sake you're Slavs, and you mixed with the indigenous tribes living in the area.

 

The Indo-European expansion likely happened out of the Kurgan cultures of Ukraine / Russia, this has long been supported by linguistics, and now even by genetics.

 

No, I was very blond when I was young, and exceptionally beautiful.. and with exceptional legs... no joking. I just realize now in my old age that I should have shown them off more, but I felt more comfortable with pants. Anyway I'm just repeating what I read, and I have read that Iranian women are very beautiful. Did you know that before the 20th century, all dolls eyes were black because they were considered to be the most beautiful? This is also why the women in the paintings have dark eyes. Yet the only women I have seen with real black eyes are the Spanish and some Syrians.

As for Arab men, I'm thinking of the young men not the older ones who are ugly. When I look at them killing themselves I think what a bunch of fools, they should be in Hollywood.

 

the hottest women on Earth are from the British Isles and Scandinavia.

 

there is no nation that has a free-trade agreement with the EU without also free movement.

- - - Updated - - -

they look NOTHING like Arabs.

 

Well, we know what side you're on and what to expect from you, then. In the face of input proving the "other side" is no better, and probably worse, you persist with your fixation on the past and drag your hatred into the present.

This is just why we need to stop rabble rousers on the left from promoting their Marxist insanity in our schools, so that our children can grow up with a balanced viewpoint. Not everyone can think their way out of a twisted world view taught to them as a child when they become an adult. Children have a right to grow up seeing the good side of their own culture.

The bottom line is that most of the world was incredibly savage until Christ arrived and began his teachings. It took time for those teachings to settle into the barbaric Europeans and not be misused by them, but it finally did, and was exported to the US from there.

Meanwhile, Mohammed was busy perverting the teachings by living out his fantasy of becoming a supreme religious leader--and when this did not initially work out for him, in Mecca, he became a warlord in the Medina area, wreaking havoc there until his teachings were accepted. That is where the vilest and cruelest teachings of Mohammed surfaced, and it is the sin and shame of Islam that those vile and sadistic teachings erupt, again and again, over time in Islam and justify everything from murder to sexual slavery if it can somehow be twisted into being seen as Islamic.

That is where Islam is today. Christianity as taught by Christ (not the Old Testament teachings) is where the Christian West stands today.

No, people in the West do not always follow the teachings of Christ, but you should thank whatever you personally believe in that Christian teachings affected the evolution of our laws over here. If Islam had control slavery might still be legal, and many other despicable things as well.

 

I think you will find, when the gloves come off, that the EU is not La La Land at all, but a power-grabbing entity that will fight tooth and nail to retain that power. It should be a good lesson for anyone that assumes an over-arching NWO government would be disinterestedly benevolent.

Look even now at what the UN is doing with its population mixing schemes, just because the person in charge of refugees believes in migration.

The positions of power in organizations like this are too removed from the monitoring of the people. Even in the US, as it has grown in population, this has increasingly become the case. The last few American presidencies have done despicable things, as much out of stupidity and craven opportunism as anything, totally against the ideals and beliefs of most of the population. Power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely has never been more clearly illustrated.

 

A statesman amongst greedy, self-serving and self-satisfied pen-pushers who can see their lucrative little world collapsing around their ears, and not a moment too soon! My hero!! Ni-gel, Ni-gel, RA-RA-RA!!

 

What, that we don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about a collapsing market and would prefer to go after markets which can afford to trade with us? I think we know what we're doing.

 

Because the UK would prefer to stay in the single market, if at all possible. Brexit is about two issues: Britons do not want all the control from the EU and/or they do not want all the people.

 

I'd love to see more English goods make it ashore over here.

 

The EU wasn't a collapsing marker it was the largest market in the world.

 

Absolute lies colonial Christian powers did not kill 1/10 of the Islamic Imperialist hordes, not only that but the Muslim slave trade was much larger than that of the West and their colonial occupation and oppression of Hindu, Christian, Jewish, and Buddhist lands continues to this day. Muslims have more blood on their hands than any other people's in history, more dead on the Indian subcontinent than the genocides of Hitler and Stalin combined. And the opium war wasn't started because they refused to sell opium it was because they seized British goods and refused to compensate them.

 

The British outlawed slavery kid genius. The Islamic Imperialist colonial occupation of North Africa, the Middle East, Byzantine, India etc was far more oppressive and bloody than anything you can point to in the West and the worst part is it continues to this day!

 

There is no genetic evidence whatsoever that the Indo-Aryans ever made it to the Indian Subcontinent that is a myth perpetrated by the Nazi regime.

 

I've watched some of these euro videos lately( a lot more entertaining and comprehensive debate than what settles for US Politics) and I noticed this about the EU Parliament: It has something of 670+ members(not sure of the grand total.) Given those circumstances, what can one MEP really accomplish? That's another problem with the EU structure, it's TOO big.

 

"Free trade" is a lie. It isn't "free." The destruction of American industry and the shattering of tens of millions of people's jobs and careers on behalf of cheap Japanese, Chinese, Indian and Indonesian crap isn't free at all.


The mega rich elites and international corporations claim that the words "free trade" is self proving as if the edict from God. In fact, among the first acts of the US government was to PREVENT cheap imports destroying Americans' jobs and the American economy.

 

The US Stock market has gone up, as have Asian stock markets - and UK stocks have not collapsed. So much for that prediction of doom!

Now the EU zippy pinheads threaten a trade war with the UK. Whoever runs the EU really are a bunch of idiots.