WAR ON THE STREETS OF PARIS: Armed migrants fight running battles in French capital

You are wasting bandwidth with a patent rabble-rouser.

It's useless ... of course Paris is not undergoing any insurrection. In fact, most of the migrants that were squatting in Calais have been accepted in towns all around France (more or less well). Many have understood that they cannot get to England just because they speak rudimentary English. (Besides, with Brexit, the English are trying to save their own jobs.)

Paris has this problem: A huge warehouse that has been refurbished as a hotel (with rooms) is taking a bit more time to finish than thought necessary.

And let's face it, regardless of their point-of-origin, they are lucky to be able to remain here. Whether they can find a job or not is another thing, and the authorization to work is NOT automatic. Without saying it openly, France is hoping that they just get tired of doing nothing and go home, and if they decide to defy the law they get that ride back free, for nothing and immediately.

France has very high unemployment. They are not welcome, but neither can Europe just get rid of them. Europe did not have the courage to block them to begin with, so now it is financing their "tourism" ..

 

Might a lack of "permit" technically classify it as a riot [if that's what you are suggesting]?
I assume you are referring to the people fighting [as opposed to those protesting]; if so then those drunk brawls I've witnessed in the past must also be classed as such... but that's not what I'd call a riot.

 

It was a yes or no.

 

Unless there is some relevance to my last post where I stated

then the question is not just irrelevant but also has a clear answer [and therefore seemed rhetorical], so I was trying to naively speed things along so you could get to the point you were attempting to make.

But it keeps me entertained. It's a slower news day.

 

That is not commenting on my remark in any way.

There is something to be said about doing something against a tyrannic government.
And when a governmental agency is violently and racist for decades....

Actually. White people do the most drug related crimes. Black people get disproportionately arrested over it, since that was the active policy of racial profiling. It is also black people that get longer sentences than white people on average when confronted with the same crime. White people also get on probation earlier than black people. That's all part of the institutionalized racism of the Arian/Jewish community, that has it's roots in the Jim Crow era. Do note,.. Jom Crow only ended 20 years after WWII. Hence BLM.

Nope. It is a valid point, since you show you got a totally one sided view about race, and like apartheid policies to applied.

If you got police forces like the one in Chicago and Fergusson who are exceptionally racist, violent and acting illegal all the time, and believe they have done nothing wrong with the mass incarceration of the black community,.. than you can indeed come up with such a highly dumb conclusion.

Most mass shootings are done by white males.

 

Sure it is, you claimed they are going into stores and submitting to background checks.

So that's a "yes, the cops deserve to be murdered by blacks". Why can't you white progressives ever just say that? Why are you so vague about it?

Black people commit a disproportionately high amount of violent crime. Sorry that fact bothers you.

At least I'm not saying people need to be murdered, like you are. Must be that progressive morality I hear so much about.

Except they investigated those department and found no evidence of racism. Just another example of progressives ignoring reality that doesn't fit with their retarded political agenda.

Doesn't refute my point at all...

 

Thot so. Owned

 

As a tried and true alt-Left, what I want is no more erroneous and fabricated reporting by the Rabid-Right British-press like the "Express". The French press, which covers Paris, since that is where most are located, have no accounts of rioting in the streets.

Calais has been cleared, a great number have come to Paris, and where they accumulated (a quarter along side the Metro Stalingrad) they have been evacuated to quarters elsewhere. Others are straggling in, but they are not allowed to remain.

Such newspapers as the Express should concentrate on Brexit, which they generously supported, that will lead Britain down its long road to an economic doomsday.

Now, that's real news of which Brits of should be concerned ...

 

When winter sets in, and they're on the streets freezing cold, and they see the occupants of luxury cars warm and snug in air conditioned comfort, that's when the trouble will begin.

 

I don't know about you but I wouldn't mind a couple less of those socialists around.

 

I like your definition of "owned" (let's not mention spelling of thought ) it's cute when people misinterpret how things work on the web.

So still no reasoning as to why a permit it relevant to the discussion?
No? Just going to make strawmen sentences and pretend that it has some significance?

I don't see how lack of a permit is tantamount to a "riot or war" when the same language is not used when a lack of permit is missing during a drunken brawl in any other circumstance. And who gets a permit to fight in the street anyway? I'm not sure they have a category for that.

Come on, at least try to make a point rather than typing randon things because you are bored. If you put something coherent together you might actually find I agree what you are hinting at, as I tend to lean, vote, and think towards the right.

 

Spelling was intentional used to emphasize the succinct manner in which I destroyed your argument. It's my flag to remind me that you dodged and therefore lost the chance to discuss that topic further. Its like playing an extra inning after youve already won. There is no reason. Have a nice day.

 

Destruction , your definition is amusing. There is nothing to destroy, but if you feel you need to gain a level up in your internet debating, by all means feel free to wear a sticker on your chest. Keep flying those flags.

Of course, you didn't recognize the way that I put "no, they were unlikely to have a permit" by suggesting I though it was rhetorical (I have to admit, I gave you the benefit of the doubt of being to talk at that level) and instead interpreted as a "dodge" [as if I have something to lose by dodging such a question (or any question for that matter, especially on the web), which always gives me a chuckle - I just love the varied range of people you get on political forums].

I've given you ample opportunity to put forward your reasoning on why a permit to "block a street" is relevant to the "war" or "rioting" language as I was discussing, but you continue to ignore this simple task. I think that's how you "destroy" yourself on a forum, is it not?

 

Not read

 

And you think seriously this will be the case?

 

No, that's why I posted it!

 

Ok ... I wanted only to clarify it

 

Hehe, not surprised
[Although I'm a little disappointed, I was enjoying playing your game]

 

Just a quick FYI:

The migrant campments were dismantled before yesterday.
I guess you guys in the US can sleep safe tonight

 

So many people here who are either hell bent on seeing armageddon happening somewhere or just want to be the next Nostradamus.
Only a few weeks and we will be able to see whether your prediction was correct or not.
I have my doubts.

 

When you think that the Islamic war against us is the manifestation of the predicted conflict of good against evil, then 'armageddon' it certainly is. But as you so rightly say about my supposition - time will tell, and I hope I'm wrong.