Where's Trump's Nobel Peace Prize?

Still, not a single person can explain WHY Obama legitimately earned that award. Weird. For someone so genius, you figure it would be obvious. WHy is that?

 

Pretty much it is because even these inveterate Obama worshipers KNOW that in reality Barack was nothing more than a two-faced warmonger and so the prize was utterly unearned in any respect.

 

Twit tRUMP has already bombed a country. Should they receive one after a bombing?

By Michael R. Gordon, Helene Cooper and Michael D. Shear

April 6, 2017
WASHINGTON — President Trump said Thursday night that the United States had carried out a missile strike in Syria in response to the Syrian government’s chemical weapons attack this week, which killed more than 80 civilians.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/...tary-responses-to-syrian-chemical-attack.html

2 1/2 months in. He didn't give them time to award a peace award.

 

Shouldn't it be taken away AFTER you do it, then? Or, does one only need to spread peace for 8 months, only to order the deaths of 1000s later, hehe.

 

Why would you think I know the answer to this?
I am not on any nobel committee.

Does a person who wins a MVP award in a sport get it taken away when they are no longer the MVP?

He never won again. I guess it was deemed he no longer deserved to win.

 

Trump fans are now dealing in fantasy. Here is reality.

Let me make one thing clear. The only people talking about the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula are the South Koreans and Trump. Kim has not said that, nor has the North Korean state-run newspapers.

North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, has told South Korean envoys he is willing to negotiate with the United States on abandoning his country’s nuclear weapons, officials from the South said. “The North Korean side clearly stated its willingness to denuclearize,” the statement said. “It made it clear that it would have no reason to keep nuclear weapons if the military threat to the North was eliminated and its security guaranteed.” From the North Korean viewpoint, that is one big "If." It would not only entail the cessation of all military exercises involving the U.S. military, but it would involve the total withdrawal of all American troops from the Korean Peninsula.

And that is the North Korean position according to South Korean officials.

In other words, hopeless. But not according to our gullible President.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

Kim Jong Un talked about denuclearization with the South Korean Representatives, not just a freeze. Also, no missile testing by North Korea during this period of time. Great progress being made but sanctions will remain until an agreement is reached. Meeting being planned!

5:08 PM - Mar 8, 2018

Trump is willing to believe the South Koreans even though he has not heard that from North Korea. He is willing to accept second hand knowledge as gospel. Prior to becoming President, Trump had zero experience in foreign relations. Trump is now willing to overrule 64 years of American foreign policy and the advice of his advisors, again, and go it alone, again, just as he did with the tariff issue.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un appeared to be at ease and even in a joking mood at a dinner with top South Korean officials, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday. He should be in a jovial mood. He is meeting with the leader of the free world. Thanks to Trump, North Korea is now a world power.

The prospect of Kim scrapping his nuclear arsenal? Zero. To Kim, it is matter of survival. Nuclear weapons are the reason North Korea is a world power in Kim's mind. Abandoning them would cause loss of face. The nuclear arsenal is in the Constitution.

On May 30, 2012, the DPRK official website “My Country” issued a revised North Korean constitution. The new preamble asserts that Kim Jong Il made the DPRK into an indomitable and nuclear state.

Kim Jong Un talked about denuclearization? Come on, now that is funny.

 

Adhering to the actual theme of this OP, what's funny is that if Trump were to convince North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons -- which I don't think he can do -- he wouldn't even be considered for a Nobel Prize strictly because he is Right of Center. Obama, on the other hand, got it because he was Left of Center and of a dark skin tone, period.

 

He looked and pursued.
Didn't give up, like Bush and the R's do.

Oh yes, then there is the point someone else made to you.
He SUCCEEDED.
Bush, FAILED.

 

You mean 1/2 white.
Blacks can't get a peace prize.

 

For a headline that reads, they agree to talk?

 

He never would have been looking it if hadn't been for Bush. Obama never would have gone after him on his own, he probably supported the guy.

 

What meme? Link or lie?

 

What a fool post. Not even related to what you replied to.

But you did get to use Clinton. So kudos for that.

 

WOW. Derails own thread.

 

Lying never works when anyone can look up historical facts.
Try again.

Buy to your point, if Bush had done his job, Bin Laden would never have made any headlines.
A real president would have taken him and his terrorist network out.
Thanks for bringing that up.

 

He wanted Saddam to stay in power, why do you think he would go after Bin Laden?

 

Obama already set the precedent by bombing 7 Muslim countries and issuing record drone strikes and still was able to keep his Nobel Peace Prize. So, I think it's only fair that Trump gets a Nobel Peace Prize too.

 

WTF?

 

Dodge duly noted and fully expected.

Keep VS Get one after the fact.

 

if this issue bothers you so much why don't you ask the Nobel prize people?

 

Obama got a participation trophy.

 

And it appears to be making you people crazy.

 

Makes the trophy worth less.

 

meh....

Get over it