With Scalia gone it is likely the pro life movement goes with him

and you need to read her actual words instead of biased BS.

Live action was set up by a proven liar, Lila Rose, and it is noticed that not a single quote attributed to Sanger in that article actually references or links to it's source, furthermore I have already stated (in the comment you replied to) that Sanger was a supporter of Eugenics, that in no way implies your other assertions are correct, which as anyone who has actually researched Sanger's writings will know.

To save going through the same old BS vomited by pro-lifers time and time again, here are a number of discussions and debates concerning Sanger from within this forum .. I suggest you read them, you might actually learn something.

http://www.politicalforum.com/abortion/318502-pro-life-margaret-sanger-vs-reality.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/debates-contests/419581-margaret-sanger-racist-not.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/gay-lesbian-rights/408154-demanding-tolerance-while-giving-none-3.html - Post #24 onwards
http://www.politicalforum.com/curre...mithsonian-museum-remove-bust-pp-founder.html
http://www.politicalforum.com/abortion/346455-abortion-our-generations-slavery-3.html = post #25 and post #43
http://www.politicalforum.com/women...er-her-negro-eugenics-program-speech-kkk.html

In fact there are so many here is the complete advanced search of the forum where Sanger is mentioned - http://www.politicalforum.com/search.php?searchid=2428643

You will find that by far the majority of sources I used in those discussions are actual true reproductions of her writings etc and contain no bias either way, unlike the sources you use.

 

Perhaps YOU should change your name to Mr. Lie. Sanger was ANTI ABORTION:

http://www.redstate.com/ironchapman/2013/01/23/what-did-margaret-sanger-think-about-abortion/