They assume having a gun, alone, makes them safe, because they think that's what we think. They think this because they choose to not understand what we say.
Oh man, how cool are they? I predict a new craze in urban America that will not turn out well, but that might put an end to liberal gun grabbers forever.
In their defense, they are safer than the rest of us at the range. I always take 2 people to the range with me. One to watch the target and the other to watch for noobs muzzle strafing me!
Taxpaying citizens are not slaves. In Canada and Scandinavia, the top income bracket pays 60% in taxes.
So they are only 60% a slave. Using a global scale, you are "Very rich" Why aren't you giving 90% of your money away now?
Nancy boy, Seattle would be a GLOWING crater, and you wouldn't be able to go into the Pacific Northwest for ten thousand years.
It is one of ours, and thus the lawless actions of criminals must be stopped. If federal action is required to do so because the pansy ass mayor and governor will not then that is the course that will be taken. You are so concerned with the rights of the rioters but you totally ignore the rights of those the rioters are infringing upon. It’s the double standard you continue to display on here.
Oh that was in Seattle, I thought that was in Minnesota. My mistake... And it was not a TV broadcast. Damn you just flat out lie now?
The point you continue to miss is that you and others Say these protest are in response to a tyrannical govt. if that were true then these protest would be reacted to in a tyrannical way, i.e. A10s would make a run, AH64s would be deployed, Bradley’s would roll... But that is not happening..why? Cause we do not have a tyrannical govt. Thus the rioters have no basis for their riots.
You have riots because you have tyranny. You're about two steps behind where you ought to be in your thinking
We don’t have tyranny. Of course you think anybody who does not wear a mask “is trying to kill you” so your judgement is fear based crap so I can believe you think we do.
So what is tyranny by your definition? The equivalent of being made to refrain from taking a dump in the communal well seems an intolerable intrusion by your standards, but watching the police possibly murder a man on national tv is no big deal. You'll forgive me for being confused.
You always seem to be confused so you are indeed excused! You can not define tyranny in a internet post. A few too many variables for that.....
Well, that's interesting. So, you're antifa. How many buildings did you burn down today? I'm not accusing you, just wondering.
Much like wisdom begins in knowing what you don't I've always felt that confusion is the genesis of clarity There's a lot of bandwidth here, I wouldn't think you'd need a textbook to define tyranny. Try to begin a real answer. Look on it as an exercise in conciseness
You watched too much Kung Fu as a child on TV. You define it. Go ahead...let’s see what you can muster up...
How can a poster with BANNED under his name continue to post here? Go ahead and report this post---I dare ya.