Zimmerman Gains Over 100 lbs Since Killing Trayvon Martin

Seriously right.

 

So you are saying angry people smoke weed or that weed makes you angry.

He only had a bloody nose, that doesn't mean Trayvon ambushed or attacked him. How could Trayvon have put the type of ass whoopin on Zimmerman that he claims and not have any injuries to his hands?

It is if you come at them in a hostile manner.

Ok, but if Trayvon was a violent person as you claim wouldn't he have been carrying some type of weapon or how many gangbangers or gangstas do you know that don't carry a weapon. Also if he was a "thug" as many of you have tried to make him out to be, they don't carry "legal" weapons.

Sure it matters, Zimmerman claims it happened on the concrete.

Yea I know blood doesn't flow off of your skin on to your clothing.

Right, but they would support slavery and Jim Crow segregation.

Neither party is mine not the Jackass or the Elephant.

 

Oh thats right the truth coming from Conservative Treehouse.

- - - Updated - - -

True, but the people who vote to do nothing in those neighborhoods are usually conservatives.

 

I don't have it, but I believe the State of Florida does.

I thought I did, two scratches on the back of the head and a bloody nose.

Likely, which means it wasn't broken. abrasions to the face please post that. I am pretty sure if you head was slammed to the concrete multiple times you would have more than two scratches to the back of your head. You probably would have passed out. Probably had a concussion, probably had a split skull, etc.

I disagree. We have a murdered 17yr old and a 28yr old holding a gun.

As has been repeated to you. You can't jump out of your vehicle with a loaded weapon in pursuit of someone, that someone comes up dead and then you claim self-defense. The police have already stated that Trayvon was doing nothing wrong and if Zimmerman would have kept his fat ass in his truck that Trayvon would still be alive today.

 

1. No , thats not what I am saying at all. The connections you come up with are puzzling.

2.

3. Explain hostile manner, and present evidence that George did this. Then, show the law that confirms this statement of yours

4. Again, you are making up puzzling claims that I havent made and we have gone over this twice now in a row.

5. Doesnt matter where the assault takes place when it happens. Grass, concrete, etc. Why on earth would it matter?

6. Show evidence that zimmerman had zero evidence of blood on his clothes, and then show evidence that the clothes examined was his complete outfit during the conflict.

7. Who knows about Jim crow but it was obvious they supported slavery and its expected for everyone to know that

8. Well Id love to know what conservative view points you have if neither party is your affiliation, because that implies balance which I have never seen from you.

 

Why they did the investigation has no bearing on the fact that the filed it away as found and never did an investigation of Martin's jewelry. So the claim that you gave been falling back on for over a year the police investigated and found that it wasn't stolen' is and always gas been false.

 

Sorry, dear. . .it was NEVER shown in anyway as "Martin's jewelry."

And since the police has known and has had access to the "found jewelry" and the pictures of those since March 2012. . .they have had PLENTY of time to investigate.

So. . .where is your proof that they didn't?

 

Well what are you saying?

Shows he was in some type of altercation.

Well lets see, if I am trying to find you and I make the comment, "these (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s always get away." Would you say that is a comment one makes to greet someone.

You made a comment about him being a violent kid, then you made the comment of that is why he was seperated from the rest of his classmates. So to put it to rest please explain your comments.

So if I told the police I shot you on my porch and then they determine I shot you in my front yard, do you think it would make a difference?

I have already posted the evidence of the blood on his clothes and then if his complete outfit was not examined that would sound like someone hiding something don't you think.

Study up alittle bit about Jim Crow and get back with me.

Again both parties are one and the same. History shows us that.

 

Trayvon's class mates said that he was cheerful and funny.. and loved to make everyone laugh by mocking the "gangsta culture".

 

Are you being obtuse or did you just not comprehend my post ? For the 3rd time now , I didnt say "violent" .

He got separated from the rest of the kids from his behavior which I think had anger issues .

On your porch and from lawn ? If you shot em in the back on either piece you'd have alot of explaining to do .

I'd have to see evidence goerge didnt or did have on his full atire during the attack and during the photos after .

Jim Crow laws happened 120 +years after founding fathers , pick up a history book .


If you think both parties are one in the same, why doesn't your post history reflect it ?

 

He got suspended for having a bag containing weed. Again show us where he was suspended from school for anger issues.

So now if I slammed your head in the grass do you think it would split your head open and mind you it had been raining off and on that day.

LOL, you lost me on that one.

I have. I don't believe I asked if the Founding Fathers supported Jim Crow segregation did I. My question was did those who supported Jim Crow Laws if they were more conservative or liberal.

It does, that is why I say neither party is mine. Not the Jackass or the Elephant.

 

Interesting , I think we covered everything though .

 

We are waiting on you to point out where he got suspended from school for anger issues or are you backing away from that now.

Please scratch that Grand Champion of debate crap because you are running for the hills.

 

I think the school separating Martin from the rest of the students is a strong indicator and his smashing and basing drives the nail into the wood .

Now , what I am waiting for is you to gain comprehension skills , but I won't hold my breath . Lets look at the comment you warped into your own argument .

Originally Posted by Oldyoungin
I dont think Zimmerman was a saint and I dont think Martin was either.. Martin had some anger issues among others and Zimmerman had some strange 911 phone call obsessions.

Looks a little different than your claim (again ) .

 

I don't see anything there that shows T was suspended for anger issues.

 

Actually those that vote for things which cause further decay in those neighborhoods are generally liberal. Conservatives look for actual solutions. It is libertarians who want to do nothing - which is obviously preferable to making things worse.

 

Oh baloney... The most improved neighborhoods that I have seen were gay neighborhoods.. You must be assumeing they are all "conservatives".

 

You hope the state of Florida does. So far I have seen no evidence that shows GZ is guilty of anything.

See you can't bring yourself to describe the injuries honestly. Lacerations to the back of the head consistent with blunt force to an object such as concrete, two black eyes and a likely broken nose. Why do you completely skip the black eyes and falsely down-play the other injuries?

"The injuries are consistent with a harder object striking the back of his head than his head was." - Investigator for the Prosecution

Now that's funny. Seriously, the doctor examines the injuries, checks the box that says broken nose and says it's likely broken and somehow in your agenda-driven mind that somehow translates to not broken? Wow!

Clearly visible in the photos. Have you still not seen those yet?

"According to a report from the Sanford Fire Department, released Thursday, Zimmerman had "abrasions to his forehead"

http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/18/justice/florida-teen-shooting

It all depends on how successfully you resist your attacker. Certainly you are in a very dangerous situation and justified in shooting anyone who slams your head against a side-walk successfully at least twice.

And you have shown zero evidence that GZ was not acting in self-defense.

,

Umm, you can absolutely get out of your vehicle to check on what someone is up to in your neighborhood. This isn't the freakin' Soviet Union. If you happen to be carrying that is absolutely fine as well.

Did I ever say all liberal neighborhoods are bad? The worst neighborhoods are currently found in the inner-cities, which predominantly support Obama.

 

An unarmed dead teenager and a lying gunman who is known to have perused him and no bells going off huh? OK let the jury have at it

 

I have not seen ANY proof or even INDICATION that Martin had anger issues. . . .please provide a link.

In the other hand. . .you forgot to mention Zimmerman's WELL DOCUMENTED anger issues (and drug/alcohol issues)
I do agree on the strange and obsessive phone call made by Zimmerman to 911. . .it reads like a comic book diary!

 

You've got to have more than your hunch to convict someone of murder. You actually have to have evidence.

 

Or a signed confession.

 

More sekret ebidence that's going to convict Zimm.

File it away with the racist e-mail that Zimm supposedly sent Tracy and all the horrible things supposedly pulled from Zimms phone ( which he voluntarily gave up unlike the Martins/Trayvons phone and the shenanigans with DeeDee).

So Zimm got grilled for hours, even did a recreation the next day, has maintained he is innocent, has not taken a plea deal or broken his bond, but he most definitely signed a confession that he is actually guilty?

Sure he did.

 

His confession differs from his statements to SPD and his re-enactmnt video and his Hannity interview.

You must admit that George behaved very suspiciously that night.. Most criminals stalk their victims.. rapists, muggers, robbers, pickpockets, kidnappers etc.

Trayvon certainly wasn't a mind reader and didn't know the police were on their way..

Don't you hear Travon wailing, "I don't know" and "stop"?

 

How? Give a specific example.