Zimmerman Trial (Weekend Edition)

That IF has a 50/50 chance of playing out very soon. Thanks for your answers but you missed my last question. Should Zimmerman be found guilty to save society and white people specifically from random murders or other such mayhem?

 

Then you do not understand the law. If you chase somebody and mouth off in a hostile manner, which even pig boy admits to, you are an aggressor and have no further rights until you attempt to escape.

If you approach in a hostile manner, you have the right to run or grovel.

Yes, unless he tried to escape or apologize for inconveniencing Mr. Martin before Mr. Martin was aware of the gun.

 

Hope not but I could see some people trying to carry through on their threats of murdering random white people.

- - - Updated - - -

What is AA?

 

Has the prosecution explained how GZ got those injuries yet?.....just curious as to what theory they are relying on......are they pretending, like so many here on PF, that Trayvon the Child (TM) had nothing to do with GZ'S injuries? Word to the wise Ms. Nifong......that ain't gonna play with a mostly white jury.....just sayin'........please pick up the white courtesy phone and call your cousin Michael.........oh that's right......nobody can find him.....or his law license........LMAO at this travesty of justice.

 

Of course not. He should be found guilty because he is a worthless, lying, murderous sack of FAIL.

 

So you have proof that zimm wasnt allowing trayvon to go anywhere especially with his life, and he made it perfectly clear that was his intentions?

Where did zimm falsely imprison anyone. He himself was being held down. And even if somehow zim had falsely imprisoned him, he would of had to be in trayvons vicinity to do so. So please tell me where zimms right to go where he wants was taken away?

So by your logic, if i go to a mall and stand in a corner somewhere, and someone walks close to me and stops while talking on there cell phone and looks at me, i can beat his ass without fear of persecution?

Im glad that your perverse sense of justice is not what we have in this country.

- - - Updated - - -

African Americans

 

Actually, that is his claim and the State is doing an excellent job proving it for him.

So, if it hasn't been proven that Trayvon saw the gun then your claim is pointless.

BDLR may do that but last week he was busy proving the defense's case.

 

He will probably have to call somebody competent from the Medical Examiner's office to share a laugh over the stupidity of the PAS who mistook those owies for the kind of injuries you get from having your head bashed on a flat surface.

Probably the fact that the owies on his face look like they are from running into a tree, and that the ones on the back, sides and top of his head are gun-shaped.

Get a clue. You cannot make that sort of marks on somebody's head by beating it on a flat surface.

 

Everyone then has the right not be beaten or killed. If Mr. Zimmerman believed that Mr. Martin was going to beat him senseless or worse you agree he would have the right to use appropriate force to keep from being further injured or killed?

We don't know exactly what happened prior to the shooting. Perhaps facts and testimony will shed light on what had taken place.

- - - Updated - - -

Thanks.

 

A fat psychopathic SOB told the cops that Martin noticed the gun, at which point, under SYG, Martin had the clear right to use deadly force to obtain and keep possession of it, even if it meant killing the boy bumper who had been following him.

You really need to understand how these processes work. Bernie has to let certain people tell their lies before he can refute them, like that idiot PA's assessment of fat boy's owies.

 

Florida Governor Rick Scott apparently thinks so. That's why he initiated this whole fiasco to begin with. Florida voters can't wait until 2014, to get rid of him.

 

Not under 776.041(2)(b). He had the right to run or apologize. He chose a non-existent option of murdering a suspect so that he could claim he was preventing a crime.

Yes, we do, some of it from fat boy's own mouth. He chased kid down and, when asked why, acted like a boy bumper. Screw him He had no right to live unless he was trying to escape.

 

Any sentence implying that that bald-headed clown "thinks" is absurd on its face.

He does what his ear crickets and ALEC and the Koch roaches tell him to do.

 

Dont know what planet your from, but seeing someones gun does not give you the right to take it, especially if the owner has not drawn it or threatened you with it.

 

FALSE!

HERE is what 776.041(2) says >> "Initially provokes the use of force against himself or herself, unless:"

There is not a shred of evidence to show that Zimmerman provoked use of force against himself, nor have you shown any.

Therefore it remains that the justifiable use of force IS available to Zimmerman.

 

Well, we finally came up with something to agree on.

 

How is that not the point? It shows George is making up his story. Yes he had the right to be there, but so did Trayvon.

 

I think you are correct here.

It must have been TM...what, with- all the injuries he sustained and all.

 

Thank you that is all that matters, zimm had the right to be in the area regardless if martin was there or not

 

If he is attacking you for no reason, of course you do, under SYG, because your life is clearly being threatened even without his drawing the weapon. You do not EVER let a boy bumper keep his weapon. EVER. Under SYG you are not obligated to let him keep it.

 

You are one sick puppy.

A certifiable mental case if I ever saw one.

 

But he had no right to be attempting to detain Martin or to talk like a boy bumper and put him in fear for his life. Go back and learn some law. Start with "false imprisonment."

- - - Updated - - -

You fail to understand the law regarding self-defense or SYG. We teach children that it is okay to hurt boy bumpers.

 

Who was stalking whom? Hmmm.....

As for evidence...it's all out there, police reports, 911 calls, re-enactments; if you need a lawyer to filter the evidence for you then just hand all your money over to government now since they will be swindling you out of it anyway.

 

I can only assume from your repeated and boring use of the term "boy bumper" that you had an unfortunate experience as a child with an adult male........I am truly sorry this happened to you.....but it really has nothing to do with this case and it would probably be better for you if you didn't keep using this term over and over again....which obviously exposes you're not so idyllic past......

 

There is nothing saying zimm attacked anyone. Trayvon had no damaging marks on him side a bullet hole. And unless you KNOW he is a "boy bumper" you have no authority, not to mention it is illegal for minors to possess a fire arm at all. Your entire logic makes no sense at all.