Dad hit son for not watching Obama

I do understand where some of your concern is coming from.

 

Nothing odd about it; anything that adds to the psychological portrait of Obamabot is important in understanding how to deal with hope and change

 

believe it or not, that was on FoxNews and after they exposed that sick SOB, he resigned from the bench...... he should have been jailed along w/his wife who stood by and let it happen.......

And most child abuse cases has nothing to do w/politics - but obviously this case where the boy was smashed in the face w/a mug b/c he wasn't listening to Obama does......

 

Anyone that thinks a person that lashes out in anger is automatically supporting whoever happens to be on TV at the time is an idiot.

 

Oh gawd....... and this sadistic bastard is totally out of control. He should not be in public office, but in prison.

If he does this to his mentally disabled son in public, not even caring that there are witnesses - what does he do to him in privacy?

 

I heard he had resigned and he shouldn't have been given that privilege, but kicked off the bench as a matter of principle ...... to hell w/the statute of limitations.

 

What happened to the child was wrong, yet I see no condemnation of that act from you...only condemnation of the original poster.

A complete and purposeful misreprentation of what DonGlock stated:

"Another Obamabot gone off the deep end. His mortgage and gas bills must not have been paid off yet. His days of watching "president" Obama are growing short."



Where did DonGlock accuse everyone who voted for Obama of doing this? Notice how Don used the word "another". I suggest you find a dictionary and look up the definitions of "another" and "every", because clearly you don't know the difference.

You wrongly attack DonGlock for stating something he never stated, accusing him of linking this to "every person who voted for Obama", giving off this feign reply you are offended at what you perceive as group labeling, yet in this paragraph, the very same labeling you are supposedly offended by - you label TEA Party people with false labels. You should do something about that ADD...or maybe it's just hypocricy.

 

Seriously, though—when did Congressman Charlie Wilson (D, OH-06) stop beating his wife? Moreover, why is the media covering this up?

Two weeks ago, Big Government editor Mike Flynn obtained Belmont County (Ohio) court documents that revealed that Wilson repeatedly beat his wife Clara, to the point where she would be unable to stand.

According to Wilson’s own testimony, he would regularly kick, slap, beat, and punch Clara, accusing her of adultery. Clara’s deposition states that Congressman Wilson punched her with enough force to knock the wind of her, leaving her beaten and bloodied, slumped up against the kitchen cabinet.

Give us a break with your pathetic attempt to equate the two while cowardly avoiding condemning the man in the OP.

Such a typical liberal ploy. Man up and condemn the OP.



http://www.redstate.com/athensrunaw...ou-stop-beating-your-wife-congressman-wilson/

 

We all see what we want to see...

I have no need to show up in every crime thread and act shocked and dump on whoever is mentioned to make me feel superior. Hitting, biting, shooting, raping, stabbing people particularly children is wrong. This should be common sense. Does it need to be repeated on daily basis.

 

Why the hell should I? That has nothing to do with the purpose of the thread.

 

You sure got that right!

 

"Some of my concern?" My only concern is this boy is under the thumb of a sadistic father who'd do that to him, who has no understanding of kids ...... and over what? Obama's state of the union speech - which is always replayed later for those who missed it........

And bastards like him keep on breeding.......

 

Well that's fine.

I'm a hopeful kind of person and I feel most people know hitting a kid in the face with a mug is wrong regardless of the circumstances. I don't think just because a person doesn't jump on the internet whenever they hear about it they are somehow condoning it. You have a right to conduct yourself as you wish.

This is a political forum. The first post of this thread attempted to smear people that voted for Obama by drawing an illogical inference. As someone who voted for Obama I have a right to defend myself against this unprovoked and unwarranted smear.

The guy was watching a recording. I don't think he was upset that he was never going to see it. From the OP's link...

 

The boy would have been smashed in the face no matter WHAT they were watching. Fathers who will do that to a child don't have to have much of an excuse.

 

I think that is one of the big take home messages from this thread. People that behave that way come from all walks of life and always have some excuse for their antisocial behavior. Falling into the trap of thinking there is a simplistic reason for why these people do what they do is a dangerous error to make.

 

I don't know what the final outcome has been if any. I got that information from this article from November:

 

If the story is true, then what the father did was wrong. I don't know how anyone could think that liberals here would defend something like this.

 

Sometimes the Constitution works for you and sometime it works against you. If the statutes of limitation were arbitrarily applied based on how pissed off someone is on the internet businesses would flee this country. Talk about uncertainty.

 

... too late.