I will address your points --heather is lucky to have two mommies. After all don't we see moms as nurturing? What does it mean to a mother? You tell me. --- my reading comprehension is fine and your need for a personal attack is sophomoric ---you are correct I don't know what children see...but you seem to know what they see. I know many gay families and I hope most are as loving as theirs. My cousins had twins.(artificial insemination) the boy is at Princeton, the girl at oberlin) I have worked with thousands of teenagers and had to rescue too many from abusive parents...yep, husband and wife families. -- since your bigotry leads you to conclude that gay parents are insane, there's no sense in dignifying the statement --isn't it disgusting that people are more tolerant? I miss the good old days when gays could be fired, women got paid less and segregation was legal. Damn that insanity of tolerance
I don't see what that has to do with my statement. *shrugs* I don't have a problem with gay marriage. That is my opinion and there is nothing to argue about. K?
I'd expect it to appear so to shallow-minded clods. But that's probably just coincidence. Gee, thanks for the stupid. No there are not, because as anyone with half a brain doesn't need to be told, the damage is done while those people are nowhere in sight. Sure, why the hell are we slouching towards Gomorrah when we could be sprinting? Pretty much got that bang on, haven't I?
Bang on with your bigotry, I would say. Other than than - just a bunch of pathetic talking points from crazed religious nuts.
Sounds What damage is done? We are slouching to Gomorrah.....we have allowed women rights. Soon they'll think they're equals
What you mean, of course, is that she's lucky not to have a father, lucky to be living with a woman who pretends to be her mother, and lucky to be surrounded by "friends" of the family who assure Heather that she owes a debt of gratitude to the self-indulgent witches in whose charge she finds herself. And that's never a bad thing, right? Lady, I wasn't born yesterday, and I know when people are looking for answers that lend themselves to being twisted. Then I see no choice but to assume you asked such a retarded question in the hope of irritating me - in which case, bad try. I don't need to know the particulars when it's clear the environment they're subjected to daily is structurally poisonous. Please, you haven't got a clue as to what love is. I'm nowhere near gullible enough to find this impressive, sorry for any inconvenience. The premise being intellectually bankrupt, the conclusion may be safely disregarded. Depends on one's inclinations. Lovers of lies will, of course, find such tolerance as you evince very admirable indeed. And you won't have it any other way, obviously.
The insistence on calling a spade a spade is often so characterized by haters of inconvenient truths. Most notably the right to murder their own unborn children.
Calling your words pure bigotry is indeed calling a spade a spade. You can't murder something that isn't born. But why not call it a little toddler, then you can get more emotional mileage.
No doubt it appears so to those who share your delusions. So five minutes after it's born it's a human being, but five minutes before it's not. Who knew? Emotionalism is your bailiwick, which is presumably why you can't see straight.
Yep, we all know women have abortions five minutes before it's born. So common (sarcasm alert) That's a red herring..I don't see a 1/10 of an ounce fetus as a baby. I wish you weren't so hysterical about zygotes. If only you cared about all these poor unwanted children as you are about ZEF s ...to you life begins at conception and ends at birth,
Of course whether they do or not has bupkis to do with what I said, but I can hardly expect a pro-death bigot to care.
I hate these multiquotes. Anyhow your response makes no sense. The bottom line is gay marriage doesn't bother me one bit. Obviously this is more a problem for you than it is for me, so why are you bothering me about it?
You need a new crusade. You lost. Grow up and get over it. You being all sanctimonious about same sex marriage isn't going to bring back the ol days because your argument has been losing favor for the last 20 years. You just look more and more pathetic trying to make this case. Nobody likes a sore loser.
When you give a stupid analogy it has plenty to do with what you said. Oh if only you cared about children as much as you do about zygotes. Perhaps you should educate yourself and learn that a zygote isn't alive. And you should also look up the word bigot.you seem to throw around insults and poor analogies like a little kid.
Your the one who looks pathetic....gay marriage has been gaining favor and that's why it's legal! Young people don't have your hang up.
I support gay marriage 100% but people on the pro-SSM team who call anti-SSM folks "bigots" are the extremists I don't care for. Preferences on sexual orientation doesn't constitute bigotry. Grow up
it's about women ..it's femiphobia.. a man being feminine in any way repulses you. Ask yourself why? Why do gay men disgust you and not gay women? I hope you aren't producing men to a sex act
did you get upset when people who didn't support interracial marriage were labeled bigots? The reasons that people object to gay marriage is personal and it could be religious beliefs...but I think it is bigotry when they want to deny it to people who don't believe as they do
Race and sexual orientation are two different things. Trolling around finding excuses to use the word "bigot" is a classic extremist case. Nice work
