Kamela Harris is Not Eligible to Become President

She's a natural born citizen (and, yes, where she was born matters for that). She was not naturalized. She got her citizenship the same way Trump did.

 

Harris was both born in the US and had a US citizen father at the time of her birth. This is nonsense.

 

The Constitution was adopted in 1789. Sorry that you don't seem to understand that the term refers to British Common Law.

A person was either considered to be free or a slave based on the status of their mother.

 

OK. Harris was born free, obviously. And, she is a citizen based on Article 2 of the Constitution.

 

She’s a US citizen. Move on.

 

In April of 2008 Senators Patrick Leahy {D-Vt.} and Claire McCaskill
of Missouri introduced a non-binding resolution which was co-sponsored
by Obama and Hillary as Senate Resolution 501 which was passed
unanimously on April 30,2008.
The central argument of the resolution was " that there is no evidence
of the intention of the framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional
rights of children from serving in the military or to prevent those children from
serving as their oountry;s president. "
Then why did Obama wait to almost mid-June in order to
fork over his Birth Certificate.Which was a Short Form Not a
Long Form.Plus wereas McCain provided his entire Medical
history { over 4,ooo pages } while Obama provided less than 2 pages
from one doctor.
Because that's the kind of Politicians were dealin' with here folks.
As Corrupt as our Mainstream media.

 

Doesn't meet the standard.

The only time in American history where the father's status was significant was when the US purchased or acquired French territories where British Common Law was not present.

In Louisiana, for example, paternity determined the status of being free or a slave.

The individual states determined citizenship prior to 1866. Petitions were submitted to state courts.

The Constitution was adopted at a time when all of the several states were former British Colonies.

 

Everybody KNOWS that Harris is Constitutionally Eligible to hold the Office of President.

^That is Universally Accepted (and utterly beyond dispute).

Your misguided Constitutional "interpretation" is 100%"WRONG. Period.

^Beyond that, no further comment (or discussion) is warranted.

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?forums/conspiracy-theories.63/

 

Because you are making up standards that don't actually exist.

Also completely untrue. If your father is an American citizen, you are an American citizen, regardless of your mother's status. Same goes for your mother, regardless of your father's status.

 

Except it's never said about a white person

 

Whereas Obama Sr. was Not a U.S. Citizen.He had dual citizenship
from Kenya and also Britain.
Plus he was asked politely to Leave Harvard for his womanizing.
Obama's Mother { Ann Dunham } did not strictly meet the age
requirement to classify her son { Obama } as being a citizen at birth.
Plus all the malarkey concerning " Natural-born vs. Native-born "
The Public was being force fed that the same are equal.

 

OK AJ, show me when the Article 2 requirement was Amended... I contend that it is STILL an active part of the Constitution.

This is a direct challenge to your, "Everyone Knows," attempt to avoid the truth.

 

Under your "standard" the first 7 Presidents would have been prevented from running for President.
Obviously, you are wrong.

 

This nonsense died years ago. Yes, Obama is a US citizen. Same as Trump. The desperate argument about his mom has been debunked already. There is no legal distinction between "natural born" and "native born." There are only two ways to become a citizen: by birth or through naturalization.

Gullible conspiracy theorists are being force fed this disinformation.

 

Is that your understanding of the Requirement for the Eligibility
to be President of the United States.
I guess that explains why Obama refused to cooperate with his
Georgia Eligibility Trial when he was formally subpoena'd.

 

Fake argument. No one is saying Article 2 doesn't apply. We are just pointing out that your attempts to re-write what Article 2 actually says are nonsense.

 

Do you think that Jefferson, Adams, and Hamilton all intended to exclude themselves from being President? Cause your
argument would mean that none of those three would have been eligible.

You are wrong. End of story.

 

It isn't "my understanding." That's how citizenship works here. We don't make up different rules for people just because we don't like their party affiliation. And please do your homework: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/georgia-on-my-mind/

 

oh look, another black person accused by Republicans of not being a TRUE American.

seems to be their new schtick.

 

As I recall, aside from the framers who were specifically excluded in the text, there was one before Obama and he hid his status. Chester A. Arthur's father was Irish. Think about it. Why would the framers of the Constitution have wasted all that ink carving themselves an exemption if "natural born citizen" was meaningless?

 

No it dint.You only wish.Like the Lie that Obama Never
Spied on the Trump campaign.Or this huge Russian Collusion Lie.
I suppose Obama was correct all along about the cause of the
Benghazi Attack.
Obama Lived to con,bamboozle and treat the truth as if
some mere inconvenience.It takes time but eventually the Truth
will win out.

 

Tell us all Just How Black IS Kamala Harris.
Name someone,just One someone in the Congressional
Black Caucus who is as White Looking as Harris.
Go ahead.This should be fun.
Thereby the use of " person of color ".

 

What exemption?

 

The conspiracy fantasies are meaningless drivel. Even the court case in Georgia that you cited proved you are wrong. But, I get it. You are losing this argument so you have to throw out everything else you can possibly think of.

 

Lol, this is just precious. Tell us, what "status" did Obama hide? As vapid as this is, at least it is entertaining.