Maichelle OBama sports $2000 sun dress

Links?
It shouldn't be hard to find "hateful" and "ridiculous" insults toward Laura Bush. . .IF they were as common as what you claimed they were!

I've never seen them, never heard them.

 

True;

Help stimulate, the economy, there is a lot of good stuff out there in the vast realm of fashion. It is like your partialy opened oyster just pleading for women of all types to come over and own it. As MO knows how to endulge in the finest of the finest, she knows how to pamper herself and enjoy all that she has worked for. We all know who wears the trousers in her houshold.

So there is no reason the rest of the femminin population (to include gay men) to styme their self care and enjoyment.

If more people go out with their fancy dressess all fixed up to enjoy the pleasures of life, they would not be so stuck up and conservative. Go on people, let it all out, be free as your country will allow, and indulge in what you are worth.


LOL...........

 

Can you please furnish us some documentation for this claim? I personally don't remember any such thing, but I could be wrong.

 

Sometimes people feel that way. Even though it did not happen that way.

 

Wrong about what you are, I said I can't say.

Are we allowed to attack racist or will it get you banned. I think the rule is you can make racist comments all day, you just can't attack the person who is actually a racist.

 

"Barack will not allow you to continue living in the same way..."- Michelle Obama....apparently it's the REST OF US who need to live a more austere lifestyle, not the Obamas..

 

It's not a question of austere.Nuns are austere.Yes,a First Lady has
to be austere when going to any state affair.She represents We the
People.A simple idea'r lost on a couple from Chicago.
In her own little way Michelle is acting out.The exact opposite of
what Jackie O tried to accomplish.That being to bring eloquence and
dignity into the White House.A lot of good all Obama's
eloquent tongue accomplishes.

 

Michelle Obama is married to a man that has a $400,000 annually salary with assets worth at least $4 million. I believe the wife of anyone with a $400,000 income and millions in assets is entitled to a $2000 coat if they want one.

Conservatives argue that we shouldn't raise taxes on the wealthy because they spend and invest their money which helps the economy. Is this an argument that the wealthy should hoard their money and not spend it? Are the conservatives now advocating that the wealthy individuals hoard their money and assets?

Have the conservatives changed their stripes once agian or is this just continuing conservative hypocracy?

 

This has to be the most absurd poppycock ever. I don't even believe that Jackie Kennedy Onassis even owned a coat that cost less than $2000 when her husband was in office and that was almost 50 years ago.

All of Jackie Kennedy's garments came from world renown fashion designers. Conservatives would come unglued if Michelle Obama purchased only one-off designer clothes.

 

Not the case here. MO is just better looking. A lot better looking.

 

True. She deserves the good stuff. What husband would not treat the lady like a queen with the best of the bestest.

Only a selfish greedy husband with a huge inferiority complex, small tallywacker and low self esteem would keep his wife in the shadows and treat her like sub human.

Obana's have class and style. They should crash a few parties. LOL....

 

True that:

They were professionals with real jobs before 2008. Hell before 1999. And they were moving on up. To the East Side, to a Deluxe Apartment in the Sky.

And now it's time to party like it's 1999.


LOL...

 

5 will getcha 10 First Lady Laura Bush wore a lot of clothes she paid
for herself.Wanna bet.?
Put up or shut up pally.

 

Exactly what job do you think he qualifies for in 'private' industry? He was a failed lawyer and community activists don't exist in the business world. I figure he'll go into teaching... if he works at all for the rest of his life. He's pretty lazy... more likely he'll just kick back and rest on his laurels.

And Michelle will most likely live out the rest of days barefoot, in sweats and a teeshirt.

They are a lovely couple, aren't they?

 

Who paid for Jackie O clothes.? Certainly not We the People.

 

If he was a CEO in private industry, the stockholders would've long ago kicked him to the curb for running up debts the company can't pay.

What is this fantasyland Obama's boot-lickers live in? Are all the bridges made of lollipops???

 

Excellent analysis of the atire and of male intrigue. MO is a excellent of the males curiosity of a strong pwoerfull modern woman who is able to handle the Pop-a-ratzzy on a dialy basis, and sill comming out on top. For some female of no-color, they have a strong resentment for this woman who has payed her dous and worked up to the eye of the media and the top of the American Food Chain.

As a result, every action, and every move is evaluated and attemps of gossip with content will evolve. Nontheless. The FLOTUS is dong America proud.

She has the ability to draw attention other 1st womens have not. Remember the Barbra Bush and the Regan lady, both had no ability to attract interest in fashion or style. In fact they may have made some males gay just by her apearence. And, which no doubt caused a lot of males to consider or divorce before it got to that stage.

Kidding aside, FLOTUS (current), is a great asset for the USA. Just think of who you would rather have a dinner with? MO and Barry, or some old time stuffed shirt couple who is too old to understand twitter and face book?

You can bet the leaders of the world would rathe have a sit down with the Obamas, than the other choices.

Imaging having dinner with the McCain couple? or the Gnat Getrich couple, or the Rob Paul couple? My choice woud be Slick Willie Clinton and Hillary.

Why? because they are intelligent people and they can provide some great insight to the world.

 

Consider the board of directors. They do the firing and hiring.

Consider the board of directors the congress. They are the real underlying problem. Fire them and you can hire a new CEO.

 

Uncle Ferd wantin' to know...

... if ya got any pics of her...

... wearin' a black leather body suit...

... preferably holdin' a whip?

 

Jackie Kennedy had that fetal alcohol look with the eyes. But yet she managed to get the young crowd excited. I don't see that happening with the GOP. THey have no good first family.

 

Your mistken FLOTUS with Holly Berry in the movie Cat Woman.

 

We can hire a new CEO without congressional approval. Business can't do it without stockholders approval.

But I agree, it's time to clean house from the top down. Nov 2010 was a good start, Nov 2012 will be like pulling out the Dyson.

 

OMG ... this is the problem faced with having a free Electorate.
The First Lady's primary function is NOT to " Draw Attention ".
My goodness what is wrong with you types.
That is why there are Protocols.Decorum for the office.To prevent just
that.To keep the White House free of any Circus atmosphere.

 

I hope she paid for ALL her clothes herself. The only one I know who didn't was Nancy Reagan and she apparently "borrowed" clothes and jewelry from designers and never returned them. Of course, that still wasn't at the taxpayer's expense - the designers were the ones who lost their shirts - or should I say gowns?

 

Not if you look at how CEO's are treated!

More their company goes down, and more bonus they get!

They get additional bonuses for dealing with "difficult times," and are praised for firing people because it raises the price of the stock!

The world of the Obama's hater is dark, full of conspiracy theories, and totally focused on only one thing: making that ONE man fail, and insulting him, his wife, and his beautiful daughters.

And. . .all the bridges are falling down! So sad!