NYT casts doubt on Israel’s claims Gaza hospital attack

They do
"The Times cannot independently identify the type of projectile that was fired from Israel, though it was launched from an area known to have an Iron Dome defense system"

Your English just sucks. Not my problem.

 

Maybe a language barrier issue?

 

"The Times cannot independently identify the type of projectile that was fired from Israel, though it was launched from an area known to have an Iron Dome defense system. The Israeli military says it doesn’t fire Iron Dome interceptors into Gaza, and indeed the missile seen in the video may not have crossed over into Gazan territory.

 

I know.
It is Israel who tells the tale that the missile did, is from Hamas, and caused the carnage.
The NYT proved it's not from Hamas, but from Israel.
The NYT shows the missile flew from that IDF post in a straight line towards the hospital, with their map.


Israel who demanded the hospital to be evacuated.
Israel who said they were going to bomb that area.
Israel who bombed hospitals before.
And now this.

 

Again: Your own article does not "prove" it came from Israel. Your own article admits it cannot prove such a thing.
Full stop.

 

I sourced "though it was launched from an area known to have an Iron Dome defense system."
You got to be ffing kidding me that it could have been Hamas who fired from an area where the iron dome... SYSTEM is at.

So yeah. I proved it. Thanks.

 

but it may have, according to the Israeli military.

 

You're quoting that the Israelis say that the missile seen in the video may not have crossed over into Gazan territory. This is the same Israelis who initially said that this was the missile that caused the explosion in the hospital. To which they then released a fake audio.

 

"The Times cannot independently identify the type of projectile that was fired from Israel, though it was launched from an area known to have an Iron Dome defense system. The Israeli military says it doesn’t fire Iron Dome interceptors into Gaza, and indeed the missile seen in the video may not have crossed over into Gazan territory.

They can't prove what they're showing made it into Gaza, ergo they can't show it was what impacted the hospital. Enough of this malarkey.

 

indeed the missile seen in the video may not have crossed over into Gazan territory.
^ This is the AUTHOR of the piece saying that, not the IDF. The IDF says appellation stops at the comma.
And indeed is an indicator of the author commenting on what was said, not indicating what was said.

Again: Is English not your first language?

 

No, I'm quoting the author saying, conceptually indeed that may be true because I can't confirm the missile I'm showing in the video reached Gaza.

The IDF says bit ends at the comma.

 

You're saying "This is the AUTHOR" while the article mentions "The Israeli military says...."
And what the Israeli military says, is indeed according to the author. But that's just going freaking and utterly childish.
Is that you? Lets hear it! And what is the point you're making with that?


The NYT did their research well, proving the missile got fired by Israel.
We can spot on the map where it came from, where it was spotted and it's in a straight path towards the hospital.
There are no other missiles. We got the article basically saying the missile may have flow over the border into Gaza.

We got Israel saying they are going to bomb the place.
We got Israel saying they threatened the hospital.
We got Israel who bombed a hospital before.
We got Israel lying what they were actually doing in the past just like we got them lying now.

 

If you think about how iron dome works, it's possible. Iron dome sends one expensive and powerful rocket to intercept each terrorist rocket after calculating its trajectory. So it firing a rocket to intercept the errant Hamas rocket, and hitting the hospital instead, does seem possible just given that. The other rockets would be intercepted later depending upon their calculated trajectory. Would need more info though.

I don't think it would really prove Israel are the bastards in this case though. Launching rockets from near a hospital isn't stellar behavior.

 

LMFAO...

Per the article.....

"The Time's finding does not answer what actually did cause the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital blast, or who is responsible."

Quit with the "it's proof" crap, already!

 

Be that as it may but this is the same Israel who initially said that this was the missile that caused the explosion in the hospital. To which they then released a fake audio. So two lies given by Israel. I personally think that the hospital explosion was caused by a remnant of a missile fired from the dome

 

Israel claims a specific missile caused it. They claimed the missile was from Hamas. The NYT proved that specific missile was an Israeli one.

There were no other missiles.
Case closed.

 

No, they did not.

If they did, they would say so.

 

That is not accurate:

https://dnyuz.com/2023/10/24/a-close-look-at-some-key-evidence-in-the-gaza-hospital-blast/

"The Times’s finding does not answer what actually did cause the Al-Ahli Arab hospital blast, or who is responsible."

 

No, they said it was an Islamic Jihad missile.

 

And the NYT proved Israel lied. It was an Israeli missile.

 

You can't prove that.

 

well your beloved President Biden said it was an Islamist missile. Funny watching the NYT contradict the guy they carry so much water for

 

Not big on facts, or honesty, I see.

 

Is he my president? How do you know where I am from? And sleepy Joe said that? lol
The same country just vetoed the UNSC resolution condemning violence against civilians. Shows they don't care about massacres at a hospital when push comes to shove. And since the NYT proved it was an Israeli missile, odds are that the US paid for it to even made it.

 

NYT proved no such thing.