People died from mRNA shots...results from autopsies in Germany

Anonymous internet users posting an article from a known misinformation site about a study that neither the poster nor author of the article have any relevant knowledge to base judgements on.

Sounds rock solid to me.

 

And your education/knowledge/experience to pass judgement on ANY scientific findings in these topics is.....

None, I'll just answer for you right now...none.

 

All things considered, it was probably intentional. It was, after all, a wet dream for the eugenicists like Gate.

Whether intentional or not, it was known. Injecting propylene glycol and graphene oxide into the human body cannot be a good thing.

 

For the most part you are correct. But I know several people who have faced their mistake and are able to speak about it. Strong individuals trying to compensate for their error. Those who I know like that took only 1 shot and realized they had hurt themselves.

Those who joined the church and had all the shots are not in that category.

 

I can't see how it's helpful to the human body to inject it with PEG and graphene oxide. PEG has been used in automobile anti freeze for as long as I can remember.

I do appreciate your civil tone, and respectfully must disagree that the shots are safe.

This article struck a chord with me because I remember last year or more one of the first autopsies I read about was in Germany. It was an 80+ year old male who had succumbed, and it found the spike protein in virtually every organ in the man's body. Weirdly, only his tongue did not have that spike protein.

 

Well, it's like this:

 

And here is the problem, once again, of someone who has no training in medicine trying to comment on medical matters.

It starts off with the statement "I can't see how it's helpful..."

So what if you can't see it. I can't see how injecting someone with poison helps them fight cancer but I'm not a doctor so I'm not surprised that I can't see it.

Secondly what I have found is that the vaccines do NOT contain graphene oxide, but if you have a reliable source that says it does please share it.

 

Good points. The silencing was very suspect.

 

Also true.

 

You realise that myocarditis was a condition before COVID and COVID vaccines, right?

 

There is absolutely no graphene oxide in vaccines and no reliable sources would say as much.

 

No, the one month is simply because beyond that you can't necessarily attribute the condition to the event, with any safety. Too much time has passed, basically.

 

Ooh, crazy Chinese propaganda, just what we need. Remember, just because it's not CCP propaganda, that doesn't mean it's not crazy Chinese propaganda. I suggest the Washington Times for alternate view. The crazy Korean propaganda will give you a balanced viewpoint.

I especially like how the antivaxxers put their noses in the air and declared they're summarily dismissing everyone else's source, right after they said how only the brainwashed would summarily dismiss someone else's source. You can't buy that kind of entertainment.

As others here have talked about, and which the study talks about, just because someone died with myocarditis, that doesn't mean the myocarditis was the cause of death. And that kills the whole premise of the OP.

A study by the American Heart Association involving 43 million people showed, the risk of myocarditis due to catching COVID is much larger than the risk of getting it from a vaccine.

https://www.heart.org/en/news/2022/...ses-higher-risk-for-myocarditis-than-vaccines

I await the antivaxxers telling us how that information doesn't count, because ... conspiracy.

 

Nah its more like this:

 

Nah it’s more like this — https://www.medscape.com/viewarticl...s_221215_MSCPEDIT_&uac=455573BT&impID=4989091

 

Have you been "doing some research" @Kokomojojo ?

*LOL*

 

I've debunked his claim in that respect, too. The truth doesn't seem to impact him.

 

I could not agree more!

Every time you come on here to post about the vaccine or boosters you look more and more like a clown.

 

If the truth impacted him he wouldn't be an anti vaxxer.

 

You cite no source for your rating.

 

Yeh I am beginning to question the intelligence of vaxers but hey everyone enjoys clowns dont they?


Pfizer’s 2021 revenue was $81.3 billion, roughly double its revenue in 2020, when its top sellers were a pneumonia vaccine, the cancer drug Ibrance, and the fibromyalgia treatment Lyrica, which had gone off-patent.

Now its mRNA vaccine holds 70% of the U.S. and European markets. And its antiviral Paxlovid is the pill of choice to treat early symptoms of covid. This year, the company expects to rake in more than $50 billion in global revenue from the two medications alone.

Paxlovid’s value to vaccinated patients isn’t yet clear, and Pfizer’s covid vaccine doesn’t entirely prevent infections, although each booster temporarily restores some protection. Yet, while patients may recoil at the need for repeated injections — two boosters are now recommended for people 50 and older — the requirement is gold for investors.

“Hopefully, we could be giving it annually and maybe for some groups that are high-risk more often,” CEO Albert Bourla told investors this year. “Then you have the treatment [Paxlovid] that will, let’s say, resolve the issues of those that are getting the disease.”

Just last week, the Biden administration agreed to buy another 105 million doses of Pfizer’s covid vaccine for the fall booster campaign, paying $3.2 billion. At $30.47 a dose, [PAID FOR BY YOUR TAXES] it’s a significant premium over the $19.50-a-dose rate the government paid for the first 100 million. The vaccine is being modified to target early omicron variants, but newer variants are gaining dominance. [Like ALL vaccines; DAY LATE DOLLAR SHORT]

Because the virus keeps mutating and will be around for a long time, the market for Pfizer’s products won’t go away. In wealthier countries, the public is likely to keep coming back for more, like diners at an all-you-can-eat restaurant, sated but never entirely satisfied.

The reliance on Pfizer products at each stage of the pandemic has steered the U.S. response, including critical public health decisions.

When last year Bourla suggested that a booster shot would soon be needed, U.S. public health officials later followed, giving the impression that Pfizer was calling the tune. Some public health experts and scientists worry these decisions were hasty, noting, for example, that although boosters with the mRNA shots produced by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech improve antibody protection initially, it generally doesn’t last.

Since January, Bourla has been saying that U.S. adults will probably all need annual booster shots, and senior FDA officials have indicated since April that they agree.

At a June 28 meeting of FDA advisers considering a potential fall vaccination campaign, Pfizer presented studies involving about 3,500 people showing that tweaks to its covid vaccine allowed it to elicit more antibodies against the omicron variant that began circulating last December. But most of the advisers said the FDA should require the next vaccine to target an even newer omicron variant, known as BA.5.

That would mean more work and expense for Pfizer, which called on the FDA to enable it to make future changes to the covid vaccine without human trials

https://khn.org/news/article/pfizer-pandemic-vaccine-market-paxlovid-outsize-profit-influence/



Yes vaxers are going to save the world!!!

At least we can have a few laughs along the way!

 

In philosophy, one is taught not to shoot the messenger.

Maybe you want to shoot down the scientists who did the research on this, too?

 

Scientists and others have observed graphene oxide by microscopy, including electron microscopy, 18 months ago or more. That's how long you've been snoozing in denial.

 

LOL.. You literally cited the WHO and thought no one would notice... LMAO....

 

Don't need to. Evwn thw

Show
Me
The
Evidence