Ron Paul is not a racist!

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by lolcatz, Dec 21, 2011.

  1. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83

    if this is your source: gallup

    show me where it says most people aren't buying it
     
  2. Jstar

    Jstar New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
  3. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    notice how it says ron paul report

    you've already shown that your denials don't take reality into account
     
  4. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Notice how i quoted you. Must mean you wrote it right.
     
  5. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    what a joke, ron paul's newsletters are going to get more and more daylight over the next week or so, it's time to wake up to reality
     
  6. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NEWSFLASH!!!

    They have had 22 years of daylight. You need to wake up.
     
  7. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you're wrong, they've been around for more than 30 years and exposure is a matter of aperture/time
     
  8. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Prove it. Show me dates.
     
  9. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    no problem, ron paul first published newsletters in the 1970's


    Paul’s newsletters have carried different titles over the years--Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, Ron Paul Political Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report--but they generally seem to have been published on a monthly basis since at least 1978.

    http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man

    i would think you'd get tired of been wrong so often
     
  10. Jstar

    Jstar New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    162
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ughhhh....drives me crazy.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    when you don't embrace truth, it can be hurtful
     
  12. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
  13. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    See, He didnt write it. But his names on it. So lets demonize him for it!!!
     
  14. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you're confused, reagan signed the law, that made martin luther king's birthday a federal holiday, in 1983

    it's really quite amusing that you think propaganda posted on face book is an accurate history lesson
     
  15. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
  16. Woogs

    Woogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    2,556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only newsletters anyone's complaining about are from the early 90's. So what is it....he only became a racist more than 10 years after he started the newsletters? That just happens to be when he was busy delivering babies, which makes his explanation more believable....unless you want us to believe he had an aversion to vaginas that stirred up racist feelings in him.
     
  17. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    and that isn't the law that made martin luther king's birthday a federal holiday

    you really should read your sources before you post them, if you don't have first hand knowledge


    The campaign for a federal holiday in King's honor began soon after his assassination in 1968. Ronald Reagan signed the holiday into law in 1983, and it was first observed on January 20, 1986.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther_King,_Jr._Day


    you see, i lived through this stuff so i know the difference between the legislation that made king's birthday a federal holiday and the bill that just changed the date of observance
     
  18. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Well show me the law that:


    Otherwise shut the muck up.
     
  19. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    it's already done, have a little patience and try to focus on what i wrote in post #117

    also, try to develop some integrity and educate yourself properly on the historical issues we're discussing

    if you stop trying to bend the facts to fit your political rhetoric, you won't end up looking foolish so often
     
  20. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The wiki article is wrong.

    "...After King's death, United States Representative John Conyers (a Democrat from Michigan) and United States Senator Edward Brooke (a Republican from Massachusetts) introduced a bill in Congress to make King's birthday a national holiday. The bill first came to a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives in 1979. However, it fell five votes short of the number needed for passage..."

    According to this website:
    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h1979-624

    The bill passed.

    Try to come up with something that isnt in wikipedia.
     
  21. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    that bill was to change the date of general observance, it didn't make mlk day a federal holiday

    it says clearly in the source you posted earlier: "TO AMEND H.R. 5461, MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY, BY DESIGNATING THE THIRD MONDAY IN JANUARY RATHER THAN JANUARY 15 AS THE LEGAL HOLIDAY."
     
  22. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I will add that the citation for the wiki article claiming that the bill failed, was an essay:

    2. ^ a b Wolfensberger, Don (January 14, 2008 ). "The Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday: The Long Struggle in Congress, An Introductory Essay". Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Archived from the original on January 16, 2011. Retrieved January 16, 2011.
     
  23. lolcatz

    lolcatz New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    Messages:
    778
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

    The whole (*)(*)(*)(*)ing point here genius (satire), Is that Ron Paul voted YES to a bill about a BLACK DUDE.
     
  24. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    you really have no clue what you're talking about


    Helms Stalls King's Day In Senate

    By Helen Dewar

    Washington Post Staff Writer

    Tuesady, October 4, 1983; Page A01

    Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.), charging that the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. espoused "action-oriented Marxism" and other "radical political" views, yesterday temporarily blocked Senate action on a House-passed bill to create a new national holiday in memory of the slain civil rights leader.

    http://www.webcitation.org/5vnjqzpMi
     
  25. dujac

    dujac Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    27,458
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    83
    wrong, he only voted to change the date of observance

    he voted against the bill to make mlk day a federal holiday




    here's a good source with the time-line of mlk day history: http://www.infoplease.com/spot/mlkhistory1.html



    this is from that essay

    Conyers would persist year after year, Congress after Congress, in introducing the same bill again and again, gathering cosponsors along the way, until his persistence finally paid off some 15 years later when President Ronald Reagan signed the King Holiday bill into law on November 2, 1983.

    http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/King%20Holiday-essay-drw.pdf

    ron paul voted against that bill, i remember calling the library of congress to confirm it

    here's an article about ron's vote on the holiday:

    http://wwsword.blogspot.com/2008/01/entire-article-confirming-pauls-nay.html
     

Share This Page